By Peter Müller and Andreas Wassermann
When German Transportation Minister Peter Ramsauer speaks before the transportation committee of the German parliament, the Bundestag, on Wednesday, he will likely get a frosty reception. Only about 67 percent of freight trains departed on time in December, and only around half arrived on time. The situation was hardly any better in the passenger rail system, with about a third of trains arriving late, some by several hours.
Those are some of the facts included in the Transportation Ministry's winter report that Ramsauer will present to lawmakers on Wednesday. The document also relates that trains throughout Germany got stuck, tracks were frozen and passengers were delayed for hours and not provided with any information. The railroad's image suffered tremendously as a result. Based on Ramsauer's winter report, it is clear that no one associates Germany's national railroad operator Deutsche Bahn with on-time operation and reliability these days. The chaos that struck Berlin's commuter rail network -- which is operated by a Deutsche Bahn subsidiary -- caused even more damage to the state-owned railroad's reputation.
The winter has forced issues onto the agenda that politicians and Deutsche Bahn prefer to ignore: the company's structural problems and the consequences of the failed attempt to privatize Deutsche Bahn.
The minister knows that he cannot simply assign all the blame to the railroad. Its owner, the federal government, must address the question of how much blame it shares for the disaster, and what's next for Deutsche Bahn.
A Vote of No-Confidence
Until now, Ramsauer, a member of the conservative Christian Social Union (CSU), the Bavarian sister party to Angela Merkel's conservative Christian Democratic Union (CDU), has not exactly been known for his creative policies regarding the railways. His biggest concern was to make train announcements easier to understand, by getting rid of unnecessary Anglicisms in the German.
But the package of reforms Ramsauer now plans to unveil is practically a vote of no-confidence in railroad policy to date. The long-planned privatization of Deutsche Bahn is now off the table. Instead, the minister wants to ensure that there is more competition on the rails, and that Deutsche Bahn invests more of its profits in maintaining tracks and stations.
Members of parliament with the governing coalition parties, the CDU, the CSU and the pro-business Free Democratic Party (FDP), are even considering more far-reaching steps, which they intend to discuss with Ramsauer this week. They involve Deutsche Bahn focusing on its core business in the future and divesting itself of other businesses at home and abroad. The plans would transform the company back into a streamlined national railroad.
Conflict seems inevitable, and not just with Deutsche Bahn CEO Rüdiger Grube. Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU) is also unlikely to be supportive of this new momentum on an issue that has been deadlocked for years. Under the previous "grand coalition" government of her CDU, the CSU and the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), Merkel herself had advocated the railroad going public. Instead, Ramsauer plans now involve a rollback of transportation policy.
Modernizing Deutsche Bahn
In December 1993, the Bundestag voted to reform the German railroad system. The national railroad, known as Deutsche Bundesbahn until then, was reincarnated as DB AG, turning an official railroad transportation authority into a company. As part of the modernization efforts, conductors were renamed "train attendants" and ticket counters were given the English-sounding name "Service Point." Lawmakers wanted to turn Deutsche Bahn into a modern company and make it fast and convenient. They even wanted it, unlike its bureaucrat-run predecessor, to make money.
The new DB AG began gathering speed in 1999, shortly after the election victory of then-Chancellor Gerhard Schröder and his SPD/Green Party coalition. Schröder brought in former airline industry executive Hartmut Mehdorn as CEO. Mehdorn completely transformed the business, with the goal of reshaping the railroad into an international logistics group -- and eventually selling it to investors. The federal government hoped to reap billions in profits from the initial public offering.
The new direction, oriented as it was toward maximizing earnings, came at a high price. Unprofitable routes were shut down, secondary tracks and stations went to seed, trains were serviced less often, and cars and locomotives that had been kept in reserve for years, now considered barren capital, were either scrapped or sold at a loss to foreign buyers.
Ever since the winter-related railway chaos of recent weeks, the consequences can no longer be ignored. For politicians with responsibility for rail transportation, it presented a dual problem. On the one hand, they were forced to recognize that they had been too careless in putting their trust in railroad executives. On the other hand, it became clear that by enacting the 1994 reforms, they had essentially washed their hands of rail policy.
That will now change.
Stay informed with our free news services:
|All news from SPIEGEL International||Twitter | RSS|
|All news from Business section||RSS|
© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2011
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH