Opinion: How Much Euro Decline Will Obama Tolerate?
A fall in value for the euro is good for Europe. Since the decline is not a beggar-my-neighbor policy to gain an unfair trade advantage, but a symptom of the sovereign debt crisis, it seems unlikely that the US will intervene just yet.
Sliding towards parity? The US should let the euro find its true level, rather than trying to intervene.
The Obama administration's stance towards Europe has performed a dramatic about-face. The benign neglect that characterized its early months has been replaced by deep concern that the contagion shouldn't cross the Atlantic. Media reports have it that Washington gave Europe's politicians a significant nudge to get over their differences and assemble the historic 750 billion bailout package of loans, loan guarantees and credit in their battle against contagion.
A Good Thing for Europe
Actually, Obama's early neglect of European interests, when he chose to devalue the dollar to bolster US employment in the export sector, proved anything but benign in its consequences for Europe.
The European monetary union always has been a fragile structure that could only take a limited amount of shock without cracking. The euro at $1.60 turned out to be the shock that broke the camel's back, fracturing Europe's south from its north. Even the Germans had difficulty exporting at that vastly overvalued exchange rate.
Now, the common currency is heading south in a hurry as investors contemplate the possibility that the euro zone will break up.
This is a good thing for Europe, because currently the declining euro is Europe's most effective tool for generating sufficient economic growth to cover its budget deficits.
The more the currency corrects its overvalued position, the more robust European exports will be -- and it won't be Germany alone that benefits. Europe's south also gains from a lower euro, both directly (it will be a busy tourist season in Greece this summer) and because higher German growth means increased German imports from Greece, Spain, Portugal and Italy.
The euro will have to sink a lot lower (maybe to parity with the dollar) before the growth it generates for Europe can make a significant dent in those troublesome budget gaps. How much euro decline is the Obama administration willing to tolerate before deciding enough is enough? Washington matters, because it can stop the euro's descent by intervening in the foreign exchange markets.
Obama's concern that Europe's sovereign debt crisis be contained virtually guarantees the US will not soon protest a continued decline of the euro. Besides, the US economy is performing much better than many had anticipated. It is in a better position to absorb the competitive consequences of the dollar's increase than at the beginning of Obama's term in office.
What also matters is that the euro's decline is not a beggar-my-neighbor policy to gain an unfair trade advantage -- rather it is a symptom of the sovereign debt crisis that is tearing Europe apart. This makes it easier for Washington to accept.
US Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner's response that the US "has a big stake in helping Europe manage through these things" was both correct and reassuring. This does not sound like a man likely to be hijacked by isolationist interests into short-circuiting the euro's continued decline.
Fighting contagion is bringing America and Europe closer today, just as fighting fascism united us 70 years ago.
Melvyn Krauss is an emeritus professor of economics at New York University and senior fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University.
© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2010
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH