SPIEGEL: Mr. El-Erian, Pimco is the world's largest bond investor, with over $1 trillion in assets. A lot of that money is invested in government bonds. Are you an unflinching optimist?
El-Erian: When investors from all over the world entrust us with their savings and retirement funds, they rightly expect us to manage risk and look for opportunities all over the world. There are some very healthy countries that are running surpluses and are net creditors. But then we have certain other countries that have suffered a severe shock to their public finances and now face sovereign risk issues.
SPIEGEL: We can think of quite a few of those. The United States, for example, as well as many European countries ...
El-Erian: The US is today running a budget deficit of 10 percent of gross domestic product and has seen its debt-to-GDP ratio soar by 20 percentage points in under two years, which is unprecedented during peacetime. At the same time, the US still benefits from being the provider of the world's reserve currency and the deepest and most liquid financial markets. In Europe, some countries, such as Greece, have a public debt crisis because of fiscal imprudence. Others, like Ireland, face challenges because they used the public sector balance sheet to assume someone else's debt, namely that of the banks.
SPIEGEL: Pimco is in regular contact with governments around the world. How would you advise, for example, a Spanish finance minister?
El-Erian: I think it was my colleagues in London who met with him and his delegation, and they did so at the request of the Spanish authorities.
SPIEGEL: How many finance ministers have called you recently?
El-Erian: Some do, as do some central bankers from around the world. The typical question we get asked is this: "What does it take for Pimco to make long-term investments in our country." The answer is always the same: an outlook of high and sustainable growth.
SPIEGEL: And your people then tell the Spanish finance minister: "Sorry, but your bonds are too risky for us."
El-Erian: We are very cautious about exposures to Greece and Ireland. Spain is under more active discussion, with a lot depending on how they deal with the problem of the cajas (savings banks).
SPIEGEL: Will countries like Greece actually be able to pay back their debts?
El-Erian: Countries like Greece have to deal with their debt overhang, and they must do so in a timely manner. They face the typical debt trap: a situation where the existing stock of debt is so large that new investors are discouraged from coming into the country with new funds. It's like having a very large, dark storm cloud hanging outside your house. You will not go out; you will wait until it passes. I remember how I reacted to the announcement of Greece's rescue package almost a year ago. Having worked at the International Monetary Fund (IMF) for 15 years, I had never seen as ambitious a fiscal adjustment program as what the Greek government is trying to do. However, even if they delivered on this adjustment, their debt to GDP would go up from 114 percent of GDP to almost 150 percent. This is what a debt trap looks like. At 150 percent, the stock of debt chokes growth and employment. And if you don't have growth and employment, the population will not be able to sustain this.
SPIEGEL: Are you expecting a haircut for Greece, a forced elimination of some of its debt?
El-Erian: Right now we do not think that Greece has in place a policy approach that allows it to deliver high growth and overcome its debt overhang. What we're waiting for is a stronger response that goes from liquidity support to both liquidity and solvency support. Then there would be many possibilities.
SPIEGEL: Germany could help Greece pay down its debt.
El-Erian: One possibility is that the European Union helps with the debt overhang by refinancing existing debt with grants. That substitutes expensive funds for free money. Another possibility is to impose a haircut on creditors. There is also the approach whereby the EU helps Greece buy back its debt at a discount. The SPIEGEL reported that this was being planned in Brussels and Berlin.
SPIEGEL: Could that really work?
El-Erian: It could be a helpful solution if it can be done on a large enough scale. But, again, this substitutes private debt for public debt. At the end of the day, the question is: Can you reduce the debt stock by enough and who carries the burden?
SPIEGEL: Would a 10 percent debt reduction be enough?
El-Erian: No. At a first level of analysis, it should be targeted at a debt stock that's below 90 percent of GDP.
SPIEGEL: If Europe were to reduce Greece's debts from the current level of 140 percent of GDP down to 90 percent, would that be enough to convince financial markets to start investing in Greek bonds again?
El-Erian: It would certainly help. Critically, it's going to be a judgment as to whether that's enough to allow the economy to grow again in a sustainable fashion.
SPIEGEL: Won't investors cry foul if there is a major haircut and they can't recoup their full investment?
El-Erian: It depends how it's done. You have certain countries, Uruguay, for example, where the market embraced market-based debt reduction. The critical thing is to do it in a way that promotes growth and employment, removes uncertainty and is thus a win-win situation. If, however, you do it like Argentina in 2001 in a very disorderly fashion, it's a lose-lose situation.
SPIEGEL: Some critics argue that Pimco's global influence has become too great.
El-Erian: We spend a lot of time at Pimco analyzing trends. We share our analyses with the public. We are lucky that people are interested in what we say and some give us feedback and test our ideas. This process triggers a tremendous amount of analytical and intellectual interactions that enable us to develop our thinking further. We believe strongly that sound analysis and thought leadership are key to Pimco's success.
SPIEGEL: One could also say, more bluntly, that you have the ability to direct markets in a fashion that is beneficial for you.
El-Erian: Our primary obligation is to protect and enhance the investment and retirement assets for people from around the world. And we have safeguarded our clients' investments through a variety of economic and market cycles, including the global financial crisis. However, if we had the influence to direct markets, then we wouldn't be too early in our investment calls so often. For example, in 2006 we undertook a very comprehensive US housing study and we said this housing market is very unstable and investors should reduce their exposure and manage risk better. Nothing happened in 2006, and nothing happened the first half of 2007. And there are many other examples, including our 1999-2000 acute concern about Argentina.
SPIEGEL: When the EU was trying to save Greece, Pimco publicly doubted that the plan would work. That fueled the crisis even further. Insurance for Greek debt immediately became considerably more expensive.
El-Erian: At Pimco, we call it as we see it analytically because that's what our clients expect from us. They would be asking us: If Greek bonds are paying 8, 9, 10 percent interest rates, why aren't you investing my money there? We owe it to our clients to share information and analysis that influences how we invest the savings and retirement money that have entrusted us with to manage on their behalf.
SPIEGEL: A few weeks ago you wrote that the debt crisis is a lose-lose situation for Germany. You even said that international investors should actually have sympathy for Germany.
Stay informed with our free news services:
|All news from SPIEGEL International||Twitter | RSS|
|All news from Business section||RSS|
© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2011
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH