World Competitiveness Yearbook: Who Will Win in the 21st Century?
In the IMD's World Competitiveness Yearbook, the US came in first once again. But other nations are closing the gap.
Singapore has climbed up near the top of the World Competitiveness Yearbook rankings.
This article has been provided by BusinessWeek as part of a special agreement with SPIEGEL INTERNATIONAL.
Among the big gainers this year: China, Korea, Russia, and Romania, all of which rose in the rankings and posted faster economic growth than the US. The decliners? Some big European names, including Spain and Finland, as well as Mexico, Brazil, Turkey, and South Africa. "Sooner or later [these nations] will lose their standing in world competitiveness if they do not improve their overall performance," Garelli says.
The study -- the most comprehensive of its kind -- examines 323 criteria, ranging from gross domestic product growth and trade levels to mobile-phone rates and higher education. Roughly two-thirds of the inputs are quantitative, gathered from sources such as the U.N. and the World Bank. The balance are qualitative responses to an annual survey conducted by IMD that examines topics such as business attitudes, regulation, and the environment.
The US continually does so well in the IMD survey thanks to several factors. It ranks No. 1 in the world for its domestic economy, international investment, financial strength, and technology infrastructure. It also comes out on top for "scientific infrastructure," which IMD defines as a blend of higher education, patent protection, R&D investment, and other enablers of innovation.
Looking At Other Studies
But in this year's study, the US skidded five positions in its ranking for "government efficiency," a metric devised from factors such as fiscal soundness, trade freedom, and bureaucracy. Survey respondents marked the US down in areas such as its legal and regulatory framework, independence of the public service from political interference, and even the behavior of customs authorities. Chile, Estonia, and even China all scored better, in aggregate.
To be sure, IMD's isn't the only list that compares countries and their socioeconomic performance. So to shed light on how different studies come up with different conclusions, we've prepared an interactive table that compares this year's IMD rankings with those of a recent study from the World Economic Forum assessing how "network-ready" countries are. There's a remarkable degree of convergence between the two lists, perhaps because both examine similar criteria to assess which countries are laying the groundwork for success in a knowledge-based economy.
Happiness Vs. Competitiveness
With our interactive table, you can decide for yourself. Our own analysis revealed some fascinating patterns. First, there is a sizable group of nations -- mostly from Eastern Europe -- who could be called the "Up-and-Coming Malcontents." Averaging their rankings on IMD's competitiveness study and the WEF's network-readiness survey, Russia, Estonia, Lithuania, Ukraine, and Bulgaria are reasonably well-placed for global businessand gaining ground. But they rank way down on the happiness index.
A trio of three South American countries -- Colombia, Argentina, and Venezuela -- shows up as being a lot happier than they are competitive on the global stage. But perhaps the most remarkable cluster is the "State of Grace" group, including Denmark, Switzerland, Iceland, Canada, Finland, Austria, and Luxembourg, which are all among the best-performing countries yet also manage to be even happier than they are competitive. That's the real recipe for success.
Reinhardt is Europe channel editor for BusinessWeek.com.
© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2007
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH