International


Attack on Border-Free Travel: Boycott Call Enrages Danish Politicians

A suggestion by a German politician that vacationers boycott Denmark now that the country has introduced tougher border controls has angered leaders in Copenhagen. But the European Union is also concerned that the new customs regime is bad for Europe.

Photo Gallery: New Checks on the Danish Border
Photos
REUTERS

Denmark's decision to increase customs controls on its borders with Germany and Sweden has not gone down well in Europe. And now, politicians in Copenhagen are firing back at a suggestion from the Europe minister in the German state of Hesse that vacationers should boycott Denmark.

Jörg-Uwe Hahn, a member of the business-friendly Free Democratic Party (FDP), told the tabloid Bild that "if Denmark reintroduces border controls during the vacation season, I can only advise people to turn around and go on vacation in Austria or Poland." Hahn has also called for the issue to be placed high on the agenda of the next meeting of Europe ministers from German states.

"Freedom of travel is one of Europe's most visible achievements," he was quoted as saying in the Danish daily Jyllands-Posten. "Those who assail it ... are carving away at the European idea."

Hahn's comments come as Denmark began more intense customs checks on its borders with Germany and Sweden. Fifty additional agents took up their posts on Tuesday morning in a move that the European Commission has warned could violate the Schengen Agreement, the treaty which established border-free travel in Europe in 1985. There are now 25 members of the free-travel zone, with Bulgaria and Romania expected to join later this year.

'Extreme Concern'

"The commission will very strictly monitor the implementation of this first phase of the Danish agreement to be sure that European law is fully respected," said Michele Cercone, spokesman for Home Affairs Commissioner Cecilia Malmström, on Tuesday. He also referred to Commission President José Manuel Barroso's statement in May in which he voiced "extreme concern" about the beefed-up Danish border controls.

Denmark says that the measures will not slow down cross-border travel and that the additional officers will only carry out random checks in an effort to stop the smuggling of narcotics, weapons, medications, drugs used for doping and other illegal goods. Officials in Copenhagen have also said they want to stamp out human trafficking through Denmark's borders.

The law was passed by Prime Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen's center-right government in May at the behest of the right-wing populist, anti-immigration Danish People's Party (DF). Because Rasmussen's government does not have a majority in parliament, it relies on support from the DF. The country faces general elections in November.

In the run-up to Tuesday's new checks, DF official emphasized that the spot checks were aimed equally at curbing illegal immigration. For more than 10 years now, DF has played a leading role in the tightening of laws in Denmark that are often perceived as anti-foreigner and anti-immigration.

But on Tuesday, customs officers played down the idea that foreigners were being targeted in the checks. Danish customs officer Orla Olesen, interviewed by SPIEGEL ONLINE, said: "Illegal immigrants aren't our highest priority. The human-smuggler at the wheel with four immigrants is as interesting to us as a drunk driver, but of course we also then intervene."

Several Danish politicians have blasted Hahn's proposed boycott. DF foreign policy spokesman Søren Espersen told Jyllands-Posten that Hahn was a "solitary, fanatical extremist." He added that he "gets the chills when someone starts to make the EU into a religion."

Peter Christensen, the Danish minister whose portfolio includes customs, told the Danish daily that "we aren't building up new borders. We are carrying out customs checks within the framework of the Schengen Agreement." He said that Hahn's comments were "too melodramatic."

'Overblown'

Still, Hahn wasn't alone in his critique. Alexander Alvaro, a German member of the European Parliament and also a member of the FDP, said that "Denmark must decide if it still wants to be a part of the Schengen zone and, in the long term, if it wants to remain a part of the European Union."

Last week, German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle told his Danish counterpart Lene Espersen that the reintroduction of controls on Denmark's border was " the wrong signal for today's Europe, which should grow together rather than drift apart." Danish media reported late last week that Westerwelle followed up the comments with a letter to Espersen, urging Copenhagen to reconsider the controls. In an interview with Jyllands-Posten, Westerwelle said that the stricter controls were an "unfortunate omen" for Europe.

Pia Kjaersgaard, head of the right-wing populist DF, said that Westerwelle's comments were "overblown."

Reports from the German-Danish border on Tuesday indicated that the increased checks had not resulted in traffic jams there. "During today's check," Erling Andersen, head of the Danish Tax and Customs Administration, told the Associated Press, "traffic flow was maybe a bit slower. But that was mainly due to the great number of reporters."

cgh -- with wire reports

Article...
For reasons of data protection and privacy, your IP address will only be stored if you are a registered user of Facebook and you are currently logged in to the service. For more detailed information, please click on the "i" symbol.
Post to other social networks
Keep track of the news

Stay informed with our free news services:

All news from SPIEGEL International
All news from Europe section

© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2011
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH




Interactive graphic
The Schengen Agreement
In 1985, the Schengen Agreement paved the way for taking down barriers at border controls between Germany, France and the three Benelux countries -- Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg. At the same time, it obligated these countries to better protect their external borders.

Signed near the town of Schengen in Luxembourg, it would take until 1995 for the treaty to bring down border gates for good.

Today 25 countries have signed on to the agreement. Even non-European Union members Norway, Iceland and Switzerland are within the Schengen Area. Bulgaria and Romania would also like to join, but have so far failed to meet the requirements. Schengen membership forbids systematic border controls. While random checks are allowed, anyone with the correct identification will still be allowed to freely cross borders within the area. Under current rules, Exceptions are permitted only when countries feel their domestic security is threatened. France made use of this rule during the NATO summit in 2009 to conduct controls along the German border to prevent violent demonstrators from accessing the event. Major state visits, high-level meetings among politicians and large sporting events have also prompted temporary border controls in some nations.

But it is not just EU citizens who have enjoyed unprecedented freedom of travel in Europe since the Schengen Agreement was signed. Citizens of other countries with a valid Schengen visa also profit. But if their visa expires, they are required to leave.

More than 400 million people live inside the Schengen zone, which has land borders measuring more than 7,700 kilometers (4,784 miles) in length and sea coast of some 42,700 kilometers. Rules of the agreement are found in the Schengen Borders Code, which names the conditions under which countries can reinstate border controls. Both Italy and France have recently done so in reaction to the flood of refugees coming from northern Africa following political uprisings there.

Under Article 23 of the Schengen Borders Code, a member can reintroduce controls at inner EU borders "in the event of a serious threat to public order or national security" for a limited time period of 30 days or as long as the threat continues. These security measures must remain in accordance with the code, though. Article 24 requires countries that feel this may be necessary to inform the European Commission and other member states of their reasons for doing so.

Zoom
DER SPIEGEL


European Partners
Facebook
Twitter

Follow SPIEGEL_English on Twitter now:




TOP



TOP