Blaming the Periphery: Right-Wing Populists Stoke Anti-Southern Rage

By Alexander Jung and

Right-wing populists in the Netherlands, Austria and Finland†are stoking anger against people in debt-laden southern European countries. Experts say they are taking advantage of the debt crisis to gain popularity.

Heinz-Christian Strache during an FP÷ party convention in Graz on June 18. Zoom

Heinz-Christian Strache during an FP÷ party convention in Graz on June 18.

Calculated provocation is as close to Heinz-Christian Strache as the gel in his carefully groomed hair. Last week, the head of the Freedom Party of Austria (FP÷) once again made use of this method with a bold analogy. Strache compared the purchase of government bonds by the European Central Bank to war financing. The FP÷ boss was obviously playing on the fact that Austria and Germany had paid for World War I largely with war bonds -- securities that were later worthless.

The euro rescue package was also nothing more than a mass compulsory purchase, Strache had railed: "Why do the Austrians, as well as the Germans or the Dutch, constantly have to pay for the bottomless pit of the southern European countries?"

Distrust towards states along the Mediterranean Sea is spreading, especially in the northern countries where stability has not been questioned by ratings agencies. The mood is being fueled by three right-wing populists who are targeting recession fears. Along with Strache, Timo Soini from the True Finns party and Dutchman Geert Wilders are trying to take advantage of the situation.

'We Work While They Drink Ouzo'

Anyone who cannot cope with the euro should withdraw from the currency union, vituperates Soini. His party managed 19 percent of the vote in April's election, after the debate over the bailout package for Portugal helped make the monetary union the top issue of the poll.

Some particularly cruel comments have emanated from right-wing populist Dutch politician Wilders. "We work while they eat souvlaki and drink ouzo," he said of the Greeks. Not a single cent would be seen again, the blond radical said, and the Greeks should be kicked out of the community.

Such sentiments are catching on. In recent years, the Dutch, Austrians and Finns have also undertaken efforts to make their economies more competitive. Some decided to avoid large wage increases, others to introduce more flexible working hours or to increase the retirement age. The countries are now doing relatively well and their people want to make no further sacrifices.

This means the mainstream parties can't afford to simply ignore the far-right. Instead they are adopting an increasingly harsh tone themselves.

Tasting Blood

In the future, no money would be sent abroad without first demanding security, Finnish Finance Minister Jutta Urpilainen recently promised. "Drastic action is the best medicine," her Dutch counterpart Jan Kees de Jager laid down as a new motto.

Hannes Androsch, 73, a former Austrian finance minister, fears that the right-wing populists like Strache, Wilders or Soini "could taste blood" over the euro crisis. "Europe's governments cannot just let this drift on," he warned. But astonishingly, the major donor countries set to carry the biggest burdens for other ailing EU economies have not produced similar figures.

"In Germany, there is a lack of personnel in the far-right scene," says Berlin political scientist Hans-Gerd Jaschke of the phenomenon. In addition, conservatives and liberals have incorporated populist approaches into their parties. And finally, the long shadow of National Socialism still hangs over the country, attaching a stigma to any right-wing populist ideology.

Even if Germany remains devoid of such influence, the debt crisis will still play a big role during the next election, Jaschke predicted. "The parties cannot get out of the way," he said.

  • For reasons of data protection and privacy, your IP address will only be stored if you are a registered user of Facebook and you are currently logged in to the service. For more detailed information, please click on the "i" symbol.
  • Post to other social networks

Discuss this issue with other readers!
3 total posts
Show all comments
    Page 1    
1. Only right wing?
olengo 08/18/2011
Zitat von sysopRight-wing populists in the Netherlands, Austria and Finland*are stoking anger against people in debt-laden southern European countries. Experts say they are taking advantage of the debt crisis to gain popularity.,1518,780621,00.html
I just don't understand the basic concept - or the basic attitude - of your article: You are automatically labelled as a right-winger if you are against a bailing out the Greek, Portuguese, Italian and whoeverelse's insolvent banks! Following your line of reasoning, the former President of The German Bundesbank, Axel Weber, must be a most beastly right-winger!
2. Populism
Eleos 08/18/2011
Populism is regularly derided in the media, even Der Spiegel, because it lessens the power of the media. Representative democracy works only when the representatives heed the will of the electorate. The media play their part using the ghosts of the past to push public opinion in the direction the influential see as beneficial for society, and especially themselves. When public opinion sees through this performance and demands the obvious, the term "populism" is brought in to create anxiety and force a change in that opinion. What is derided as "populism" is really democracy in a purer form, but one where the power of elected politicians and the influence of the media are diminished as the will of the people asserts itself. It is for the good.
3. Populism and Causality
bowlweevils 08/21/2011
"Right-wing populists in the Netherlands, Austria and Finland*are stoking anger against people in debt-laden southern European countries. Experts say they are taking advantage of the debt crisis to gain popularity." Perhaps. Or perhaps right-leaning politicians are gaining popularity because the population is angry at the southern European countries and their debt problems, and these politicians reflect those opinions. Populists get their power from the populace, not from taking advantage of them. Under what situation would Der Spiegel be willing to say that the population of these countries are rejecting the attempts of dirigiste technocrats to impose their policies on the populace? Or perhaps Der Spiegel is intentionally skewing the terms of the debate in favor of technocrats, and taking advantage of the debt crisis by using negative terms to refer to those whose opinions on the subject it disfavors?
Show all comments
    Page 1    
Keep track of the news

Stay informed with our free news services:

All news from SPIEGEL International
Twitter | RSS
All news from Europe section

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH