Imagining the Unthinkable: The Disastrous Consequences of a Euro Crash

Part 3: 'Consequences of Disaster Would Spread Like a Tidal Wave'

Photo Gallery: A Glimpse of the Abyss Photos

In the real economy, companies are also doing what they can to prepare for a worst-case scenario. If possible, they are only doing business in the crisis-ridden countries that they can finance locally. Investments in Southern Europe are being scaled back, and instead companies are trying "to accelerate growth outside the euro zone, such as in the emerging economies of Asia and Latin America," says one investment banker. This explains why mergers and acquisitions have virtually ground to a halt in Europe.

It's understandable that companies want to protect themselves from a euro crash. But if things get serious, all of these efforts could be worthless, because the consequences of a monetary disaster would spread across the entire economy like a tidal wave.

Economists with the Dutch bank ING have calculated that in the first two years following a collapse, the countries in the euro zone would lose 12 percent of their economic output. This corresponds to the loss of more than €1 trillion. It would make the recession that followed the bankruptcy of investment bank Lehmann Brothers seem like a minor industrial accident by comparison. Even after five years, say the ING experts, economic output in the euro zone would still be significantly lower than normal.

The consequences would also be catastrophic in Germany, as the German Finance Ministry concluded in a study commissioned by Finance Minister Wolfgang Schäuble, a member of the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU). The recovery and economic miracle would abruptly come to an end, and instead banks and companies would start collapsing like dominoes, after having to write off receivables and investments.

The German Finance Ministry's prognosis is even grimmer than that of the ING experts. According to their scenarios, in the first year following a euro collapse, the German economy would shrink by up to 10 percent and the ranks of the unemployed would swell to more than 5 million people. The officials were so horrified by their conclusions that they kept all of their analyses confidential, for fear that the costs of rescuing the euro could spin out of control. "Compared to such scenarios, a rescue, no matter how expensive it is, seems to be the lesser evil," says one Finance Ministry official.

Costs of Crash for Germany Could Be More than €500 Billion

The dream of balanced budgets would be dead for years. Government debt would rise sharply as tax revenues declined and government spending, on everything from bank bailouts to unemployment insurance, increased. Hundreds of thousands of jobs could be outsourced to other countries, and thousands of companies could go under.

According to a scenario by the major Swiss bank UBS, if the financial risks resulting from the decline in exports, the necessary bank bailouts and the company bankruptcies are added together, the total cost to the German economy could amount to a quarter of Germany's gross domestic product -- well over €500 billion.

And this doesn't even reflect the biggest financial risk, which remains hidden. In the last two years, the ECB has bought up more than €200 billion in sovereign debt from crisis-ridden countries. It would have to write off some of that debt in the event of a euro crash, which would also spell losses for the ECB's largest shareholder, Germany's Bundesbank central bank.

The so-called Target2 balances pose another threat. Through this internal payment system in the euro zone, the Bundesbank has accumulated about €700 billion in claims against the central banks of countries like Greece, Spain and Italy. This is more than five times the Bundesbank's own capital.

"If the monetary union collapsed, these claims would turn into thin air," says Hans-Werner Sinn, head of the Munich-based Ifo Institute for Economic Research. "Then the Bundesbank would have to write off this amount." Given that central banks are not normal enterprises, though, Sinn's conclusion is debatable. This is because central banks have different accounting options. It is conceivable, for example, that the Bundesbank could replace the Target2 asset on its balance sheet with an equalization claim against the German national budget. This would balance the equation on paper.

As long ago as 1948, the Bank Deutscher Länder (Bank of the German States, the forerunner of the Bundesbank) resorted to this accounting trick when, for example, it gave every German citizen 40 deutsche marks following monetary reform. Some of these claims have been on the central bank's books for decades.

But this time the amounts in question are different. It will likely trigger skepticism among international trading partners if the central bank simply conjures the claims from the Target2 system out of its books. It would jeopardize the reputation of the bank's executive board members as stability oriented monetary watchdogs, and possibly even the image of the new currency.

A Conundrum for Investors

Not surprisingly, German depositors and investors are worried. What happens to their assets once the dust has settled and the euro zone has been replaced with a multitude of currencies in Europe once again?

In the short term, the prices of almost all even slightly risky securities would plunge, predicts Andrew Bosomworth. He runs the German portfolio management division of Allianz subsidiary PIMCO, one of the world's largest asset management firms. Should the euro collapse, which Bosomworth still considers unlikely, he expects investors to suffer losses for several reasons. "First, they would suffer currency losses with almost all securities that were converted back to national currencies following a euro withdrawal," says Bosomworth. "Second, they would have to expect countries and companies to default more frequently on their bonds."

Asset managers see only two ways to protect themselves against a crash of the euro zone: to invest the money in tangible assets or to get it out of Europe. "Investors should nationalize their investments, with a focus on emerging economies," advises Bosomworth.

German citizens haven't recognized yet what an abyss they are facing. If the euro collapses, not only will many people lose their livelihoods, but German retirement pensions will also be threatened. The economic success of the last few years would be destroyed, and Germany would fall back into the crisis status of the 1990s.

On the other hand, if the German government gave in to the Southern Europeans' pressure to communitize debt, the risks could even be greater. Instead of an uncontrolled euro crash, Germany could be confronted with an uncontrolled transfer union. Year after year, the Germans would have to transfer sums in the double-digit billions to Southern European countries.

Time Remains to Save Euro

The worst can still be prevented, and Europeans still have the ability to save their common currency without overtaxing the solidarity of the donor countries.

But it is a massive task. Europe's politicians must surrender power to Brussels to supplement their common currency with the political union that's been missing until now. At the same time, the Italians and the Spaniards would have to prove that they could successfully reform and modernize their economies.

So far, it has seemed as if the quarreling nations of the old continent would prove equal to the challenge, as has so often been the case in their postwar history. As experienced Brussels observers know, solutions are only reached in Europe when the continent has run out of options.

But apparently the euro crisis is now so dire that it could even sweep away the oldest European certainties. Even die-hard European politicians now believe that it is no longer inconceivable that the monetary union could soon have fewer members than before. "To push Europe forward, we have to reform the euro," says Luxembourg Finance Minister Luc Frieden. "This doesn't just apply to the management of the monetary union, but, if necessary, to its geographic composition, as well."


Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan

  • For reasons of data protection and privacy, your IP address will only be stored if you are a registered user of Facebook and you are currently logged in to the service. For more detailed information, please click on the "i" symbol.
  • Post to other social networks

Discuss this issue with other readers!
8 total posts
Show all comments
    Page 1    
1. Politicians detached from popular sentiment?
derscheintrügt 06/25/2012
In Germany, mentions of Comma 4 of Paragraph 20 of the Basic Law (the german constitution) start to be surprisingly frequent. What is this comma about? Why, the right of the German people to depose their government by force if said government commits high treason by dismanteling the fundaments that "constitute" the german nation - and to cede budget control, reserved exclusively to the upper house of the german parliament, the Bundestag, to a supra-national (european) entity would do exactly that. It is probably not too far-fetched to imagine other european nations having similar clauses in their constitutions as well, although as long as one is on the receiving end of generosity it might probably be a little bit easier to close an eye or two...
2. Better Late Than Never
muley63 06/26/2012
Finally, an article that actually warns the Germans the economic abyss they face. Hopefully, it's not too late. Unfortunately, I wonder if the Chancellor refuses to listen to her advisers. In fact, I read that Guido the foreign minister is holding meetings about a federation and this, frankly, is unacceptable. First of all, Guido is a grasping, ineffective minister and second, how can a such a small group decide the fate of nations. After the Chancellor temporarily gets pass the crises, Merkel needs to seriously discuss with her political opponents about a European constitutional convention. Because if they think that they will create a new nation without going to the people, they are crazy. They need to get approval from all factions...not Guido and his merry working group.
3. The risks have been exaggerated
Eleos 06/26/2012
It seems to me that there is a fundamental flaw in the arguments presented: the Euro or Markel or whatever currency a nation uses is only a parameter. The wealth it measures is made up of the tangible and intangible assets that a country possesses, and those do not change overnight when the numbers denoting them are changed. There will be legal issues to be decided and there is the risk of cheating, but the essential wealth of each nation will not change on a dissolution of the Eurozone. Most want to follow the US and British examples of issuing sufficient money to convince the markets that it is futile to bet against printing presses on steroids, and so reduce the speculation. Let them have their way. The more fiscally prudent nations can leave and use a different currency. German exports depend on quality and efficiency not bargain basement price competition. The threats to stability seem urgent and important because markets have been allowed free rein. What is also needed is a substantial financial transaction tax, not large enough to dissuade those who have real business to conduct, just as we often pay a high price when we change currencies at an airport, but sufficient to stop the reckless speculation that seeks a miniscule advantage which can be massively leveraged.
4. Soon to Test This Theory
muley63 06/26/2012
---Quote (Originally by Eleos)--- ...Most want to follow the US and British examples of issuing sufficient money to convince the markets that it is futile to bet against printing presses on steroids, and so reduce the speculation. Let them have their way. The more fiscally prudent nations can leave and use a different currency. German exports depend on quality and efficiency not bargain basement price competition. .... ---End Quote--- German should go back to the gold standard if she doesn't feel the need to use modern monetary practice. Moreover, German have always had the reputation for quality. The phrase "German engineering" always meant the highest standard for 60 years. Yet, during the 90's, there was no export surplus. The only difference, IMO, is the introduction of the Euro which allowed German exporters to sell their good at a 20% discount and factor in the restructuring (lowering wages) between 2003-2010 and the result is the boom. All that will disappear because Germany is bent on destroying 40% of their market and the very advantageous currency they are using.
5. Blarney
tnt_ynot 06/28/2012
This article's fear mongering is irresponsible because of its exaggerations and omissions. The exaggerations foster fear mongering in example after example. There was life before the Euro and it worked well. Germany was then an export champion and will after the Eurozone members are re-structured. Turbulence will happen but it will be less of a disaster than Lehman and the past three years of crisis. More importantly is the article's omission of how disastrously costly a never-ending bailout of non-competitive economies will be. Anthony
Show all comments
    Page 1    
Keep track of the news

Stay informed with our free news services:

All news from SPIEGEL International
Twitter | RSS
All news from Europe section

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH


Graphic: Bleak Outlook Zoom

Graphic: Bleak Outlook

Graphic: Billions at Risk Zoom

Graphic: Billions at Risk

European Partners


Corriere della Sera

PM Slams “Disgraceful” Comment

Concordia Leaves Giglio