Fighter Flaws Warplane Costs Soar amid Mismanagment

AFP

Part 2: Errors and Carelessness


In a memorandum dated April 27, 2006, the company was forced to make the rueful confession that the problem was the result of production errors and carelessness. The incident had far-reaching consequences. Production had to be stopped, and all aircraft produced until then had to be inspected for similar assembly errors.

German taxpayers paid the costs of two employees' careless work. Not surprisingly, the EADS inspectors found no evidence of gross negligence. This saved their company a lot of money, because the Eurofighter contract stipulated that the manufacturer was only liable for production defects in such a case.

Relations between EADS and the Bundeswehr soured over time. The company complained to the Defense Ministry in Berlin about the fastidious inspectors at the Bundeswehr procurement office. The inspectors, for their part, complained that they had to inspect defective aircraft up to three times. Sometimes there were leaks in the tanks, and sometimes the aircraft behaved in unexpected ways, such as a cockpit canopy opening on its own while the plane was taxiing for takeoff.

An internal list from Austria reveals the poor quality of the Eurofighters at the time. Between 2007 and 2009, the Austrian Air Force took delivery of 15 first-generation Eurofighters, most of which had been intended for the Bundeswehr. By May 2011, an employee had chronicled 68 defects in the aircraft that had led to emergencies.

For example, it turned out that the altimeter was off by up to 60 meters (197 feet), which could be fatal for the pilot in an emergency. The Austrians requested an F-4 Phantom from the German Air Force, so that it could accompany two defective Eurofighters for a comparison of altimeter displays. But something happened before the test could be done: The electronic system of one of the Eurofighters was pumping kerosene incorrectly, throwing the plane dangerously off balance, which could have caused it to crash. When SPIEGEL contacted EADS, the company denied that it had found any quality defects in its own product.

On the Fringes of Legality

But the German inspectors are well aware of the reported defects in the Austrian planes, because the Defense Ministry in Berlin compelled them to handle routine testing for the Austrians.

Officials at the Bundeswehr procurement office gradually decided to bare their teeth to EADS for the first time. On Sept. 30, 2008, the Bundeswehr allowed the Manching plant's license as a recognized aviation operation to expire. In a March 2008 letter addressed to Bernhard Gerwert, the head of EADS Deutschland Military Air Systems, the Koblenz office cited "substantial mistakes and defects in the quality management system."

Speaking notes for the agency head contain concrete figures and state that "35 defects in the production process were discovered and documented during the final inspection." The documents also note that quality management found 49 defects within seven months.

This is why, in the letter to Gerwert, the Koblenz inspectors also noted: "From the standpoint of aviation, liability and licensing laws, the current state is no longer acceptable by the customer."

But by withdrawing the license, the inspectors also placed themselves in a delicate position, because they were acting on the fringes of legality. They had certified a number of Eurofighters for service in the Air Force, even though the manufacturer no longer held the necessary license.

The fighter jets were given regular registration numbers, like 30+45, 30+15 and 31+22. This allowed them to fly in German air space, and they were even sent to an air show in Hungary. Fortunately, there were no incidents, or else court judges would probably have taken a very close look at the circumstances of their licensing.

Unlimited Liability

The inspectors at the Bundeswehr procurement office are aware of the sensitive legal situation. They are personally liable for the signatures on the documents after the final test of each Eurofighter. Some threatened to withhold their approval. There is also a significant risk for the government, because the Bundeswehr, unlike civil aviation authorities, has unlimited liability for losses resulting from an accident. Commenting on this in an internal memo, a concerned official wrote: "If a Bundeswehr plane crashes and causes substantial damage to third parties that can be attributed to the withdrawal of certification, the federal government will be fully liable."

The supervisors at the procurement office and the Defense Ministry ignored the memo, because the ministry was determined to get the plane no matter what. Pilots at German air bases were already waiting anxiously for the Eurofighter, which was supposed to replace the more than 30-year-old Phantom jets made by American defense contractor McDonnell Douglas.

Orders were given to inspect the aircraft somewhat more carefully and then approve them. According to the documents in SPIEGEL's possession, this condition lasted until April 6, 2011, which both the Bundeswehr and EADS deny.

The relationship between EADS and the German Defense Ministry is poisoned, partly because EADS knows how to circumvent the rules and provoke officials.

Some time ago, say officials in Koblenz, a potential foreign buyer paid a visit to the Manching plant. Unfortunately, there was only one Bundeswehr aircraft in the hangar on that day, and it also lacked the licensing stamp. When the Bundeswehr test pilots refused to fly the plane, an EADS pilot promptly took the plane out on a short demonstration flight.

Translated from the German by Christopher Sultan

Article...
Comments
Discuss this issue with other readers!
4 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
jo6pac 07/11/2013
1. Wow
I'm sorry to see that you've sunken down to Amerikas level how sad for both of us. f-35 and f-22 over budget over weigh and doesn't like to fly in bad weather or at night. Oh just get another round of tax payers money and everything will be all right.
spon-facebook-10000061525 07/12/2013
2. optional
Given the high failure rate, of high tech military projects, I would say that the Eurofighter is a succes story. Looking at American scrapped projects, the list is very long, still they continue to pump tens of billions into military innovation. Not to mention the multitrilion dollar nuclear weapon programs of the USA or their 600 billion per year military budget, Eurofighter looks like the pin in the haystack. But for the budget conscious countries of Europe the Eurofighter is indeed, expensive
dorapilot 07/16/2013
3. Eurofighter
Der Spiegel is used to offer false "scoop" like this one. Maybe such type of articles should be written by someone more focused on defense issues. First of all, Der Spiegel should know that the Eurofighter is the most safer combat aircrfat in the history of aviation! Just one fata accident for a total of over 180.000 flying hours! Just for you to know that the average for an F-16 is around one each 15.000 Flying hours! The stories used in the article are four to seven years old and reflect in no way the current status of Eurofighter program in Germany. EADS has delivered the Eurofighter, both technically and economically, in accordance with the contract to Germany and the other Eurofighter nations, as normally happen. No Air Force accept aircrfat with flaws or technical problems. The costs of the Eurofighter are within the frame agreed with the customer. Thus the Eurofighter customer nations receive the most modern combat aircraft in the world. The performance of the Eurofighter is consistently confirmed by the pilots of the customer nations and was impressively demonstrated in international operations and comparative tests. There are no quality issues with the delivered Eurofighter. Cassidian and the National Quality Assurance Office (Güteprüfstelle der Bundeswehr) test all Eurofighter as prescribed, before they are delivered to the Air Force. Eurofighter is by far the safest combat aircraft available on the market, relating to the number of flight hours without aircraft accidents. Eurofighter has proven itself in more than 186,000 flight hours to be a reliable and combat proven aircraft. The "technical problems" written in articles are things absolutely normal in any high performance combat aircrfat, with the difference that in any "normal" combat aircrfat this led to accidents, with the Eurofighter the intrinsic safety of the aircrfat allow it to go back home in total safety. Maybe the Germand should remember how many F-104 Starfighters they have lost in the '60s and '70s just to mention an aircraft, American, that had serious technical problems.
waltertchilds 12/31/2013
4. Eurofighter
Sounds like you euros don't like to hear the truth about your fighter.
Show all comments
Page 1

© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2013
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH


TOP
Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.