A Load of Rubbish: Garbage Collector Fired for Collecting Garbage Gets Job Back
Often the reasons that bosses give for firing employees are pure garbage. But sadly, in the case of one German man who found a used child's bed in the trash, it was true. But now a court has said the company must give the trash collector his job back.
On Thursday, a labor court in the southwestern German city of Mannheim ruled that a garbage collector who took a child's travel bed home after finding it in the trash was unlawfully fired. He must now be reinstated. The court found that his dismissal without notice was unwarranted, despite the fact that he did not follow company policy on objects found in the garbage.
Garbage collector Mehmet G. stands outside the court in Mannheim that found that he should not have been fired for taking home garbage.
Treat It Like Garbage
The story goes like this: In December 2008, Mehmet G. found a child's bed in the garbage while on the job. He took it to his car, and once he finished work, he took it home, where he lives with his wife and two daughters, one 18-months-old and the other 5-years-old. His employer viewed the act as theft and fired him without notice.
In its decision, the court found that: "In objective terms, taking the child's bed away did qualify as theft and, as such, provided ... a valid reason for the firing." But the court ultimately voted in favor of the plaintiff in the belief that the punishment did not fit the crime.
In its decision, the court said it understood the employer's need to deter violations of company policy. But the plaintiff was only guilty of a very minor offense. The court assumed that the man would have been allowed to take the child's travel bed home if he had asked permission first, as this is standard practice in the industry. "Furthermore," the court found, "the bed had no other value to the defendant but, rather, would have been disposed of immediately."
The court's decision did not address the issue of whether one can really steal garbage. Instead, it focused on whether G. had followed company policy or not. Meanwhile G. claimed that he was not aware that taking things from the garbage was not allowed. But the court found that after receiving a warning in December 2007 after taking unused toilet paper out of the garbage, G. should have known about that policy. According to the company, the toilet paper still had value because it could later be recycled.
G. must now decide whether to return to his old job or look for one elsewhere. It's something he'd like to think over. "After events like these," G.'s lawyer, Thomas Karl, said, "things are usually poisonous."
According to Karl, the company must now pay G. backpay going back to December. The company, which can still appeal the case, had turned down G.'s offer to drop his complaint for 5,000 ($7,069) before bringing the case to court.
Echoes of Injustice
Karl believes that the decision of the court in Mannheim shows "that firing people without notice for the most minor of violations goes against the general public's idea of justice," according to the Associated Press.
In fact, on Tuesday, Germany's Federal Labor Court agreed to review the cashier's case, though a date has not yet been set.
© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2009
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH