NATO Reform: German Plan Faces Broad Opposition

By , and in Berlin and Brussels

German Defense Minister Thomas de Maizière at NATO headquarters in June 2013. Zoom
REUTERS

German Defense Minister Thomas de Maizière at NATO headquarters in June 2013.

German Defense Minister Thomas de Maizière wants to strengthen cooperation among NATO members and is calling for reform of the military alliance. But other countries are skeptical. His proposal also threatens to upset ongoing government coalition negotiations in Berlin.

When the NATO defense ministers meet in Brussels on Tuesday afternoon to discuss the future of the alliance, one of them will be absent: Germany's Thomas de Maizière. He will instead be at the Bellevue Palace in Berlin, where the cabinet ministers are to receive their discharge certificates from President Joachim Gauck. De Maizière will not make it in time for the start of the meeting at NATO headquarters.

That is doubly painful for de Maizière, a member of Chancellor Angela Merkel's center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU). First, the minister -- who came under fire earlier this year amid reports that his Defense Ministry had tried to cover up a scandal over the bungled purchase of a multimillion euro surveillance drone -- could potentially have a political future at the top of the defense alliance if Danish NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen steps down in the coming year. Second, it means de Maizière is forced to relinquish the floor in Brussels to the eloquent French defense minister, Jean-Yves Le Drian -- with whom Berlin is currently embroiled in a dispute.

Two weeks ago, German officials in Brussels and other European capitals sounded the alarm. France was trying "to discredit" the German proposal to reform NATO, according to a presentation given to de Maizière on Oct. 9. Paris was "making a huge effort in the capitals and at NATO headquarters to pull over to their side those countries that have remained open, but had not yet clearly backed the plan," said the officials. Their conclusion: "We have to count on France's fundamental opposition."

Interference in National Sovereignty?

The resistance of the French is directed against de Maizière's reform proposal, which the defense ministers will first address at the meeting on Tuesday. The German concept envisages that the alliance in future be divided into "clusters," which will each be led by one of the larger NATO member states.

This principle has already been applied to foreign missions on a case-by-case basis, such as when Germany took the lead for other allies in northern Afghanistan.

But going forward, Berlin wants such groupings to be firmly anchored within NATO's infrastructure. "What is new is the extent, the intensity and the scope of its application," says the paper that de Maizière distributed to other NATO members. The plan is that that these states pool their military capabilities and even join together to procure new weapons systems and equipment.

France is not the only NATO member state that sees such a step as potentially infringing on its national sovereignty. Spain and Slovakia have also expressed caution in the NATO council. Even countries that welcome the German proposals, including the United States and the United Kingdom, are pushing the question of how smaller member states, which lack certain military capabilities, can rely on Germany's solidarity if joint missions abroad must be approved every time by the Bundestag, Germany's lower house of parliament.

Putting the Brakes on Syria Mission

Germany has not proved itself in the past to be the most reliable of allies. The NATO council began flights in Afghanistan with AWACS surveillance aircraft without Germany because Berlin hesitated for so long. Germany abstained from the United Nations Security Council vote on the Libya intervention in 2011 and resolutely discouraged NATO from toying with the idea of a mission in Syria.

The question of parliamentary approval is not currently being confronted among de Maizière's inner circle. But German government military experts see it differently. "A functional defensive alliance is founded on shared risk and trust in the mutual solidarity of its members," wrote Ekkehard Brose, who until this year was an envoy in the German representation at NATO in Brussels, in a study for the German Institute for International and Security Affairs (SWP). Parliamentary approval could lead Germany "in a future NATO operation to the brink of an exit from the integrated command structure."

De Maizière knows that this topic could prove explosive in the ongoing coalition negotiations between Merkel's conservatives and the center-left SPD, who are strongly against a relaxation of the rules governing involvement in foreign conflicts, even if individual voices seem willing to compromise. "The participation of the Bundestag may be reduced if it is deemed relevant due to the contractually specified military integration," wrote Dieter Wiefelspütz, an SPD lawmaker and legal expert, last year.

In the meantime, the French have signalled their willingness to talk -- they are prepared to accept the German proposal at least as a basis for discussion. De Maizière had wanted to use the meeting of NATO defense ministers as a chance to win over some of the skeptics. His staff initially managed to have him placed at the top of the much fought-over list of speakers. He had the opportunity, they proudly reported in the ministerial submission, "as the first speaker after the general secretary, to effectively and sustainably set the tone" for further discussion of the proposed reforms. But despite these rosy initial assessments, what now lies ahead of de Maizière is a steep uphill battle.

Article...
  • For reasons of data protection and privacy, your IP address will only be stored if you are a registered user of Facebook and you are currently logged in to the service. For more detailed information, please click on the "i" symbol.
  • Post to other social networks

Comments
Discuss this issue with other readers!
3 total posts
Show all comments
    Page 1    
1. New NATO
Jim in MD 10/22/2013
De Maziere's plans are bold but probably not feasible. As the article points out, Germany is the one that doesn't want to go along with its European neighbors on missions. Germany also doesn't want to build a united data infrastructure, as the Kroes interview shows. Right now that is the problem with Europe, Germany doesn't want to go along with shared finances or data or defense. The UK can play that game, because it is an island in the Atlantic Ocean. Germany literally lies at the heart of Europe. The EU can't really work without Germany.
2. Has Germany a defence, or a war minister?
Inglenda2 10/22/2013
Before saying Germany is an unreliable partner, we might remember that Nato is a military organisation which exists without any direct democratic control. A reform is therefore long overdue, but not one which a man like Thomas de Maizière would wish to initiate. Under his leadership, the German army has changed completely from one with a priority on defence, to a force ready to join others in aggression against countries overseas. It can only be hoped, that the new, to be formed German government, will in future ask the electorate, before entering into wars with people who have never been a threat towards any part of Europe.
3. Global Warming
redroseandy 10/23/2013
Our politicians must concentrate all scarce resources on fighting global warming, not each other. The first near-zero CO2 plan was invented in the 1980s, and yet no major economy has yet adopted one. We cannot afford to be too late on this matter.
Show all comments
    Page 1    
Keep track of the news

Stay informed with our free news services:

All news from SPIEGEL International
Twitter | RSS
All news from Germany section
RSS

© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2013
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH





European Partners
Presseurop

Politiken

Corriere della Sera

PM Slams “Disgraceful” Comment

Concordia Leaves Giglio


Facebook
Twitter