Controversial Move German Ministry Ponders Honoring Soviet Spy

The German Foreign Ministry is considering placing a former employee, Ilse Stöbe, on an honorary list of staff who resisted Hitler. It would be a controversial move because she was a Soviet agent at a time when Stalin and Hitler were allies.

Gedenkstätte Deutscher Widerstand

When US Secretary of State John Kerry, British Foreign Secretary William Hague or the top diplomats of other nations visit their German counterpart in Berlin, they have to take an elevator to the first floor. As they get out, if they look to the left, they will see a white wall on which 12 names are listed: German Foreign Ministry staff murdered by the Nazis and honored as "active resistance fighters." Soon a thirteenth name may be added to that list: Ilse Stöbe.

She is probably the most controversial of the German opponents to Hitler's regime. But the Munich Institute for Contemporary History (IFZ) has submitted a report to outgoing Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle urging the ministry to honor Stöbe. For more than half a century, opinions on her have been divided.

Stöbe worked in the ministry's information department for several months in 1940. In 1942, she was beheaded in Berlin's notorious Plötzensee jail. The educated, attractive and courageous journalist was one of the most important German spies working for Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin. She repeatedly warned Stalin's military intelligence service, the MRU, about the looming German assault on the Soviet Union. So the core of her resistance activities consisted of the betrayal of secrets. Should the German government honor such a person?

Germany political parties have been debating the issue in recent years. The opposition Left Party in particular has been calling for Stöbe's inclusion and now has the IFZ institute's assessment to back its argument. IFZ historian Elke Scherstjanoi wrote that the "conditions for a public honoring of Ilse Stöbe in Germany are given." She goes as far as to place the agent alongside the siblings Hans and Sophie Scholl, students who were executed in 1943 for distributing flyers against the war and Hitler.

The shortcoming of the the IFZ report is that Scherstjanoi didn't have access to the archive of the Russian Defense Ministry where important GRU documents are stored.

That means central questions remain unanswered. For example, how should one judge the fact that Stöbe had already been recruited for the GRU by her friend, the journalist and communist Rudolf Herrnstadt, in 1931, when Germany was still a democratic republic that Hitler's Nazis and German communists steered by Moscow were keen to undermine.

Recruited at 19

Stöbe, 19 at the time, worked as a secretary for the Jewish author and journalist Theodor Wolff, then the editor of the liberal, democratic Berliner Tageblatt newspaper. She passed on inside information, mainly newsroom gossip, to a GRU agent she met on a weekly basis. There's nothing honorable about that. When Wolff fled after Hitler came to power in 1933, Stöbe quit the newspaper and traveled around Europe, presumably as a courier for the GRU, and wrote articles published in Switzerland's Neue Zürcher Zeitung and other newspapers.

Then she moved to Warsaw where her friend, Herrnstadt, was busy obtaining information from the German diplomat Rudolf von Scheliha, who mistakenly thought Herrnstadt was spying for the British. After Germany's invasion of Poland in 1939, Scheliha returned to Berlin. This was the high point of Stöbe's espionage activities. She followed Scheliha back to Berlin and, assuming the cover name "Alta," took over the running of the diplomat. Moscow would ask detailed questions, for example on Germany's policy towards Italy and on troop concentration areas. Scheliha's information was so valuable that the Berlin GRU resident said Stöbe was "utterly indispensable."

But can this espionage be rated as resistance? After all, Hitler and Stalin were allies between 1939 and 1941 when they carved up Eastern Europe among each other. Should a Polish foreign minister visiting Berlin be confronted with a memorial plaque citing Stöbe's name even though she formally worked for Hitler, and de facto for Stalin, during Poland's darkest hour?

Posthumous Order of the Red Banner

On the other hand, you don't find many squeaky-clean democrats among Germany's resistance fighters. Many of the celebrated plotters behind the failed attempt to assassinate Hitler on July 20, 1944 had previously been glowing fans of Hitler -- even Claus Schenck Graf von Stauffenberg, an officer at the center of the plot, had admired him. And the Foreign Ministry has honored other spies such as Fritz Kolbe, who worked for the Americans. Former Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer of the Greens even named a room after him. Cooperating with Hitler's enemies was one of the ways to topple the dictator.

The problem in Stöbe's case is that Stalin only became an enemy of Hitler after the German assault on the Soviet Union in June 1941 -- and according to the IFZ report, Stöbe's intelligence activities then ceased. The closure of the Soviet Embassy in Berlin in the wake of the assault meant that agent "Alta" could no longer contact her handlers. When the GRU tried to get in touch with Stöbe, it did so in such an amateurish way that Stöbe was discovered and arrested.

The Soviet Union posthumously awarded its agent the "Order of the Red Banner" in 1969. The German Foreign Ministry must now decide whether it too will honor her. It would be easier if the ministry had access to documents showing all the information the spy passed on to the GRU.

Some historians in the Foreign Ministry have suggested that the text of the memorial wall should be amended. "We should commemorate all staff of the Foreign Ministry who fell victim to the Nazis, not just the supposed or actual resistance members," said Martin Kröger, Nazi history expert in the ministry's political archive.

In that case, Ilse Stöbe's name would have to be included.

Article...
Comments
Discuss this issue with other readers!
7 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
danm 10/01/2013
1. optional
I think the most important consideration is what motivated this person. Was she a German patriot? Did she object to Hitler as a matter of personal conviction? If she was simply a highly effective operative then I would say no. But if there is something inside of her that modern Germans can identify with and admire then I would say yes.
vernony 10/01/2013
2. Well from outside of Germany
History may well applaud her now, but she must have cost thousands of German soldiers lives, and they were not all members of the Nazi party, they were just doing what they were ordered to do. If you want a personal opinion from the UK, it is no!
Fritz Oz 10/02/2013
3. Traitor to the country
She was a traitor to her fellow Germans, not just the ruling party. Her allegiance was not to Germany but to Russia and Communism. Had she survived the war she would probably have continued to be a spy for Russia. Had she just been a German communist with no connections to espionage I would not have a problem.
Jim in MD 10/02/2013
4. Double Standard
Stalin oppressed and murdered many more than all the victims of the Nazis. His world view was at least as evil, utilitarian and pseudo-scientific as Hitler's. Why does Germany still treat Communism as respectable (think: starvation, cultural revolution, killing fields) and National Socialism as craziness? International and national socialism both ravaged the world in the 20th century. Only democratic socialism is safe in a pluralistic world.
akoppa 10/02/2013
5. Unbelievable
This is the most stupid decision I have seen in my life. To honor a traitor? She was not a traitor to Hitler but to his own country.
Show all comments
Page 1

© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2013
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH


TOP
Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.