University Debate Should Neo-Nazi Students be Named and Shamed?

Universities in Germany are unsure of how to deal with neo-Nazi students. Should they expose, expel or just ignore them? The name-and-shame approach used by anti-Nazi activists in recent incidents has sparked criticism and debate.

An anti-Nazi poster at Germany's University of Bochum
Christoph Koitka

An anti-Nazi poster at Germany's University of Bochum

By and

The professor was lecturing about "basic lessons of civil law" for freshman students at Bochum University when a group of left-wing "Antifa" (anti-fascist) activists dressed as Santa Clauses burst into the hall. They ran up to a male student and pointed at him.

Few in the room knew the man, who had close-cropped hair and chubby cheeks. But Michael Brück, 23, is well-known in far-right circles. He was a member of the neo-Nazi group National Resistance Dortmund until it was banned a year and a half ago. Their members terrorized people who opposed them, held parties celebrating Adolf Hitler and attacked immigrants and police officers with knives and pepper spray. Brück is deputy regional chairman of the extremist party Die Rechte, or The Right.

The lecturer shouted "Get out! Out!" The activists yelled: "Your classmate is a neo-Nazi!" Then the professor walked up to them, grabbed a Santa Claus by the arm and pushed him towards the door. There was pushing and shoving. Borges said later that he had been attacked and beaten by masked people. But a mobile phone video taken of the incident doesn't confirm that the activists initiated the scuffle. "I couldn't accept action being taken against one of my students," said Borges. He resumed the lecture with a bloody nose.

The Antifa operation in Bochum raises a question that many universities and colleges in Germany are grappling with. How should universities respond when right-wing extremists study on campuses? And how should one react if they are publicly exposed?

Last November, left-wing activists at the University of Hanover unmasked a female student as a high-ranking member of the far-right National Democratic Party (NPD). The university's political science institute condemned the Antifa's behavior as a "denunciatory form of protest." And Marian Döhler, the director of the institute, said: "We teach independently of political opinion, religious affiliation or other traits." The NPD student posted a message on Facebook saying the action was "the best advertisement for the party."

Different Approaches

Other universities react differently. The University of Potsdam tried to stop a student from counting his stint at the NPD as one of his mandatory work experience internships. The student took legal action against that decision and won.

Student bodies also react differently. In Leipzig and Bielefeld, neo-Nazis were exposed in lecture halls. But in Trier and Cologne, right-wing extremists were voted on to student committees. Neo-Nazis often study law so that they can represent their comrades as lawyers later on. Women, says Marc Brandstetter of the Endstation Rechts anti-Nazi group, often study for teaching jobs -- possibly to be able to pass on their Nazi ideology to children.

But that's no reason to bar them from universities. Bochum University rector Elmar Weiler criticized "right-wing extremist thinking" after the incident in the lecture hall but said the law student shouldn't have been denounced. Professor Borges said no one who meets the formal university requirements should be deprived of their right to study. He added that if he meets Brück, he will give him "urgent advice" to rethink his ideology.

The law faculty's student representative board issued a statement condemning "discrimination based on party political involvement," but later stressed that there was no room for far-right ideology among students. The board declined to answer further questions, saying any additional debate would "damage the faculty's reputation."

But does silence solve the problem? Andreas Zick, head of the Bielefeld Institute of Conflict Research, said universities need to deal with the problem more forcefully. "We can't exmatriculate but we can clearly express our position," said Zick.

At the start of the winter term, Bielefeld University distributed badges and postcards to first-year students with the slogan "Uni Ohne Nazis" ("University without Nazis"). Zick organized a lecture on the issue and invited anti-racism coaches as well as one of the lawyers representing the relatives of the victims of the NSU neo-Nazi terror cell. "We can't leave it just up to the Antifa to deal with this," said Zick.

Outing far-right students is even controversial among anti-Fascist groups. The method is akin to the behavior of neo-Nazis who target people who disagree with them, said one Berlin-based activist.

After the scuffle at Bochum University, the ire of most students on the university's Facebook page was directed against the Antifa -- and not against neo-Nazi Brück.


Discuss this issue with other readers!
13 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1 01/29/2014
1. confront
It's always good to expose nazis. Posters probably are more effective in today's liberal climate full of individuals who don't understand how evil nazism truly is.
broremann 01/29/2014
2. political opinion
i don´t think any university has the right to ban a students political opinion, unless it is of a perverse nature
dtechba 01/30/2014
3. I don't get it
I personally abhor right and left wing extremists. I also understand German's obsession with fighting neo-nazism. However, I do not understand how in a country where people are in an uproar over videoing trucks in an attempt to catch a trucker that is wildly shooting at other motorists, people think it is OK to do this? The Germans are almost bi-polar when it comes to privacy. They are extremely concerned about privacy until they aren't. I don't get it.
sneeekysteve 01/30/2014
4. opinions
There is something very wrong with a country that allows people to invade a classroom, stalk students, and harass people with a contrasting point of view without granting the victims any legal recourse. In the US those people would be arrested and charged with various crimes. They would face jail time and civil lawsuits for damages from the victims. They would probably be put out of business. On a more serious note, why does Germany put Nazism on a more serious level than communism? Many of these groups doing the harassing have a communist ideology. Why is communist memorabilia sold all over E. Berlin? Why isn't the Party of the East outlawed? I think these are fair questions to ask in this situation?
johann84 01/31/2014
5. Left wing
The far left (like Antifa) is just as radical as the far-right. They "care" just as much about democracy and liberties as the far right. What the left did in Vienna last week is deeply disturbing: they "protested" against the Wiener Akademikerball by smashing the windows of the shops, police cars, damaging the center and harassing, spitting the participants of the ball just because their opinion differs. Our society is governed by laws set up by the democratically elected governments and everybody is free to express their view and opinions within the limits of our laws.
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.