Lavrov: Our greatest concern is European security. We want to see the entities engaged on the continent -- the European Union, NATO, the European Council, the Organization for Security and Co-Operation in Europe, but also the United States and Canada -- cooperate more effectively in the future instead of seeing themselves as competitors.
SPIEGEL: What are you concerned about specifically?
SPIEGEL: You are referring to Washington's plans to set up a missile defense system in Eastern Europe?
Lavrov: The Americans are negotiating the deal, and perhaps they have already secured a treaty. The system involves, among other things, a radar system in the Czech Republic and a military base in Poland. The silos for interceptor missiles that will apparently be installed there are completely comparable to those used for ballistic missiles, which can also be used offensively. New facts are being established here. We want to be told, clearly and unmistakably, why this is happening. We see no objective reason for this step.
SPIEGEL: What will you do if the Americans don't cooperate?
Lavrov: President Putin has said that we will not plunge into a new arms race, and that we don't want to pointlessly invest money in weapons again. We are looking for an intelligent answer.
SPIEGEL: We are under the impression that, beyond this military buildup issue, tensions have been growing in the relationship between Russia and the West. What is the deeper reason for this?
SPIEGEL: You are referring to the sensitive issue of energy. The Europeans are now relying increasingly on the Caucasus and Central Asia.
Lavrov: We should be playing with an open hand here and not resorting to illegal methods.
SPIEGEL: What do you mean by illegal methods?
Lavrov: I think you know exactly what I mean.
SPIEGEL: We assume that you are alluding to the political upheavals in several former Soviet republics that have been promoted by the West.
Lavrov: We fully understand the West's need for energy security. We were able to agree to principles of cooperation during last year's tough negotiations. Now we need concrete implementation. If we build the northern European gas pipeline through the Baltic Sea and -- as I hope -- the pipeline from the Bulgarian Black Sea port of Burgas to Alexandroupolis in Greece, we will have different transport routes ...
SPIEGEL: ... and it would no longer be as easy to blackmail the West. Can you understand the Europeans' fears of the possibility of being cut off from Russian oil or gas for an extended period of time?
Lavrov: Of course. If the gas, heat or electricity is shut off in your apartment -- and in the winter, no less -- you are forced to fight for survival. We are doing a great deal to eliminate such risks.
SPIEGEL: We have been under a different impression in Germany on several occasions.
SPIEGEL: Even your former close ally, Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko, is now talking about an "arrogant Russian elite" and is warning the West that Russia believes it can "conquer the world" with its energy reserves.
Lavrov: The fact that Lukashenko says this doesn't make it any truer. It was the transit countries and not Russia that violated existing agreements. Russia will never violate a signed contract. The customers in the West should talk to those who illegally tapped into the pipelines.
SPIEGEL: But there appear to be some serious communication problems between Moscow and the West.
Lavrov: Unfortunately Russia is apparently not as skillful as the West when it comes to matters of communication.
SPIEGEL: What prevents someone in Moscow from reaching for the telephone and notifying Western partners before someone else flicks a switch and interrupts the flow of oil toward Belarus?
Lavrov: On New Year's Eve we were under the impression that the gas negotiations with Minsk had been concluded successfully, and we were all relieved. But then Belarus suddenly announced this absurd customs duty for oil transit -- and removed oil from the pipeline illegally. No one is protected against such surprises. Unfortunately the Western media, including the German media, were prejudiced in their reporting. Everyone ought to stop demonizing Russia.
SPIEGEL: Russia and the EU have also had their differences on other issues. These days no one mentions yesterday's grand ideas, such as the elimination of visa requirements or the European-Russian free trade zone.
Lavrov: I see this differently. Our agreement to begin this year with the easing of visa requirements and the return of migrants who have entered Western Europe illegally is in effect. The negotiations over eliminating visa requirements altogether should continue. We are willing to do so, but the Europeans, so far, are not. The former president of the European Commission, Romano Prodi, believed that it would be possible to eliminate visa requirements by as early as 2007 or 2008, but the current Commission has other ideas. The fears that Russian citizens could emigrate en masse to one of the EU countries are artificial and exaggerated. We are also open to a free trade zone. And we have already established our guidelines and appointed our delegation for the pending negotiations over a new partnership agreement with the EU. The ball is now in Brussels' court.
Lavrov: Those are two different projects, and there is nothing to prevent them from being implemented in parallel. The opinion seems to have taken hold in Europe that Russia is constantly forced to beg the EU for one thing or another. This is the wrong approach. It's like playing a match with only one goal. Both sides must derive a benefit.
SPIEGEL: Now you sound rather bitter.
Lavrov: Even if we do reach an agreement over free trade with the EU and have joined the World Trade Organization, how will we benefit? The EU is already buying what it needs from us: oil, gas, perhaps metals, and we hope to see the restrictions on nuclear trade lifted. In contrast, you are still not buying agricultural products from us. A Russian businessman recently tried to sell high-quality bread to Finland but was unsuccessful. We want competition in all areas. Instead we are constantly confronting biases. We make concessions and receive hardly anything in return. In keeping with WTO requirements, we only subsidize our agricultural sector to a limited extent, while huge sums are being pumped into this sector in the EU. Nevertheless, we are even forced to buy this highly subsidized meat from the EU, even though we are now in a position once again to export grain and meat. We should be talking openly about this.
SPIEGEL: There are other contentious issues. UN Special Envoy Martti Ahtisaari's proposals on the future of Kosovo have been on the table since last weekend. President Putin has warned that this issue could trigger a serious crisis in relations between Russia and the EU. Do you truly intend to use your veto in the UN Security Council if Kosovo becomes de facto independent?
Lavrov: Putin never said that. Russia adheres strictly to all agreements on the matter of Kosovo -- UN Security Council Resolution 1244 and the subsequent documents drafted by the contact group. Much of that was never even implemented, such as the plan to bring back some of the Serb border troops.
SPIEGEL: That was never realistic.
Lavrov: The plan to return Serb refugees and other displaced Serbs was also never implemented. This is a disgrace for Europe. The Serbs are now the largest group of refugees on the continent. Our Western partners consistently argued that certain standards would have to be put in place before clarifying the status issue. Now we are told that the Albanian leadership in Kosovo can do nothing before it is assured that Kosovo will gain independence. At the last meeting of the contact group it was said that Ahtisaari's proposals should not be construed as an ultimatum, but as an offer to both sides to continue talks. Attempts to present these proposals to the Security Council right away are pointless and counterproductive. I cannot imagine how it can adopt a resolution that would not be acceptable to the Serbs.
SPIEGEL: Moscow has repeatedly made it clear, using a threatening tone, that Kosovo would set a precedent.
Lavrov: The Kosovo decision will certainly be a precedent. It would be the first time in the region's postwar history that independence would not be granted with the approval of both sides.
SPIEGEL: We don't believe that the positions of Kosovo Albanians and Serbs could be reconciled once again.
Lavrov: They should have thought about that before -- such as when they bombed Serbia without a mandate from the Security Council and attacked more than military targets.
SPIEGEL: It was Russia that stood in the way of a UN resolution at the time.
Lavrov: Nevertheless, what the West liked about Resolution 1244 was implemented, while the rest was not. They should have thought earlier about how to bring about reconciliation between Serbs and Albanians.
Stay informed with our free news services:
|All news from SPIEGEL International||Twitter | RSS|
|All news from SPIEGEL Magazine section||RSS|
© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2007
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH