An official video released to Iraqi national TV shows a hangman tightening a noose around Saddam's neck, but the mobile-phone video goes on to show his death.
The international community has been outraged -- especially at Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, whose government not only let a (banned) mobile phone slip into the execution chamber, but also hurried up the hanging. Saddam's half-brother Barzan Ibrahim and a former chief justice of the Revolutionary Court, Awad al-Bandar, were condemned to death along with Saddam last November for the murder of 148 Shiites in 1982, but their executions were delayed until after the Islamic festival of Eid al-Adha, which for Shiites ends this Wednesday afternoon. The Associated Press reported they would hang this Thursday.
German newspapers see the whole affair as a gruesome circus that either threatens western values or drives another wedge between Iraqi Sunnis and Shiites. Some even suspect Maliki of using Saddam's execution as a sop to his Shiite supporters.
The center-right Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung writes:
"Under pressure from Shiite Prime Minister Maliki, the death sentence was carried out on the day Sunnis celebrated the first day of Eid, which is considered a holy day of forgiveness. Shiites celebrate the start of Eid one day later. Now there's a danger that the onetime despot will be romanticized by Sunni Arabs as a martyr in the struggle against Shiite Islam. (...)
"The Sunnis will remember Saddam's last exchange of words with one of his hangmen, who revealed himself as a follower of radical Shiite preacher Muqtada al-Sadr. Sadr commands the militia most feared by Sunnis in Iraq. He's also the most important supporter of al-Maliki's regime. (...)
"Talks are already in process between Baghdad and Washington to replace al-Maliki with another, more energetic Shiite politician. It's possible that the over-hasty execution of Saddam was an attempt by Maliki to win back popularity among his Shiite constituency."
The left-wing Tageszeitung asks ironically:
"What do the minimum civilized standards of the free world mean? The answer is, more or less, that nobody should bring a mobile phone to an execution.
"(These civilized standards) determine how television footage should be edited. Official videos end before the trapdoor opens. (...) Pictures of the body are okay -- including while it is still hanging on the gallows. (...) But the moment of death: That's taboo and has to remain taboo!
"(We need to ask) whether it can ever be squared with our system of values to show a human being in the face of death to the public -- or if we are, in the process, getting closer and closer to the terrorist mentality which we actually want to fight."
The center-left Süddeutsche Zeitung writes:
"It would have been a miracle if Saddam's execution had not raised new problems for the Baghdad government, the overstrained US army, or for the violence-plagued Iraqi people. But now a mobile-phone video has turned up, and the pictures and sound both show, first, just how degraded Saddam's death was, and second how depraved a society has to be to turn the execution of a condemned thug into a cheap and coarse spectacle. (...)
"The video also shows that neither the Baghdad government nor the American occupiers are in a position to control an execution. (...) Saddam Hussein's death won't heal old wounds any more than it will satisfy a lust for revenge -- the pictures are more likely to achieve the opposite effect. And a government that can't even prohibit recordings of an execution will never be able to control its country."
- Michael Scott Moore, 12:30 CET
Stay informed with our free news services:
|All news from SPIEGEL International||Twitter | RSS|
© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2007
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH