Capitalizing on the Euro Crisis: China Expands Its Influence in Europe

By Wieland Wagner

China is seizing on Europe's debt problems to expand its influence on the continent with large-scale investments and purchases of government bonds issued by highly-indebted states. The strategy could push Europe into the same financial dependency on China that is posing a dilemma for the US.

Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao (R) during a visit to the Acropolis with Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou in October. Zoom
DPA

Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao (R) during a visit to the Acropolis with Greek Prime Minister George Papandreou in October.

Portugal's cavalry staged a magnificent parade to welcome Chinese President and Party General Secretary Hu Jintao, 67. Suddenly, one of the horses reared up and threw its rider to the ground. The state guest from China waited motionless until the end of the ceremony before he went to the fallen cavalryman, embraced him, and asked if he was all right.

There was symbolic value to Hu's caring gesture in early November in Lisbon: China's foremost party organ, the People's Daily, wrote enthusiastically that this was the "Best moment for the world to see a true China in flesh and blood."

Given the acute debt crisis in the euro zone, there is a wealth of opportunities for China to show sympathy in Europe these days. With pledges of financial aid and statements of support for the euro, Beijing is endeavoring to stabilize its largest trading partner -- primarily in pursuit of Chinese interests.

Even before his arrival in Lisbon, many in Portugal were yearning for Hu to come to the rescue. In view of the alarming Portuguese government debt, the Chinese leader promised that he would support the country with "concrete measures." He said China intended to double bilateral trade by 2015.

This wasn't exactly what the cash-strapped Portuguese were hoping to hear. They wanted Hu to also help out by buying government bonds. Nonetheless, before his visit, Chinese Vice Foreign Minister Fu Ying had already hinted that this was a definite possibility.

Offers of Aid for Troubled Euro Members

Indeed, the rising superpower is cleverly capitalizing on the euro crisis to extend its long-term political and economic influence in Europe. Chinese offers of aid are mainly directed at the shakiest members of the euro zone, the heavily indebted so-called PIIGS countries (Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Greece and Spain). The People's Republic would like to win them over as long-term allies in the EU.

In the past, China had shown itself to be a "friend" of Greece, Spain and Italy, and it purchased their government bonds at a time when other investors had fled, Premier Wen Jiabao said during a trip to Europe in October. "We will continue to provide aid and help certain countries overcome their difficulties."

Speaking to the parliament in Athens, Wen made a promise to the Greeks. He said that China would purchase Greece's government bonds as soon as they were available again on the financial markets. These were only words, but the jittery markets saw them as a vote of confidence in the euro: They were spoken by the man who helps decide how China invests the largest currency reserves in the world.

China has amassed some $2.5 trillion (€1.9 trillion), and an estimated 70 percent of this has been invested in dollar-based holdings. But the rulers in Beijing are observing with growing concern how their largest debtor country, the US, continues to drive down the value of the dollar with its lax monetary policy.

Switch in Strategy

This has recently prompted the Chinese to increasingly invest their reserve stockpile in non-dollar currencies. One of the leading proponents of this diversification is Yu Yongding, an influential economist and former advisor to the central bank, the People's Bank of China. Yu is known as "the dollar killer" in Beijing. Although he admits that other currencies "are not necessarily an ideal replacement" for US government bonds, Yu says that this will allow the People's Republic to minimize its losses should the US currency dramatically drop in value.

Last July, China spent €400 million on Spanish 10-year government bonds. During a visit to Beijing in September, Spanish Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero dutifully thanked the Chinese: When China increases its share of Spanish government bonds, he said, it bolsters confidence in the financial markets. He added that he hoped China would purchase even more Spanish government bonds.

The cash-strapped southern Europeans are increasingly looking to Beijing to solve their budget woes. But it is difficult to ascertain which countries are being supported by the Chinese state capitalists through government bond purchases.

The investment managers at the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) devise their strategies behind the walls of a nondescript large office building in Beijing. They rarely make public statements. Formally, the SAFE answers to the central bank. Last year, People's Bank of China governor Zhou Xiaochuan, 62, caused an international stir when he proposed replacing the dollar with a super-sovereign reserve currency based on the Special Drawing Right (SDR), the IMF's unit of account. This proposal came from the upper echelons of the Chinese leadership: Zhou, a member of the Central Committee, strictly adheres to the instructions of the Communist Party.

It's a similar story with the state-run Chinese Investment Corporation (CIC), which manages some $200 billion of the currency stockpile, with assets in foreign equity funds, mining operations and corporations.

When it was founded three years ago, the CIC was eyed with great suspicion by Europeans. "EU officials came to me and asked me to commit that my investment will not exceed 10 percent," CIC manager Lou Jiwei said last year with undisguised sarcasm. "I said that's fine, then I'm not going."

Times have changed. These days, the Chinese rarely encounter resistance like they have faced in Hamburg, where they tried in vain to purchase a stake in the city's port. Across large swathes of Europe, they are now welcomed with open arms.

Greece a Bridgehead for Chinese Trade With Eastern Europe

The People's Republic has primarily set its sights on Greece as a bridgehead for its trade with Eastern Europe. Even before the current debt crisis, Chinese state-owned shipping giant Cosco signed a deal to lease port facilities in Piraeus for 35 years. By 2015, China intends to increase the annual transshipment of containers from the current 800,000 to 3.7 million, Premier Wen announced.

In the Irish town of Athlone, Chinese investors are considering building a gigantic conference and exhibition center for their export industry. From Beijing's perspective, one of the advantages of this location is that Ireland is the only English-speaking country in the euro zone. In Portugal, energy giant China Power International is looking to buy a stake in local provider EDP; both companies want to collaborate to produce renewable energy in Europe, Africa and Brazil.

And in Italy, Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi even had the Colosseum in Rome bathed in red light for Wen -- and ordered the Chinese characters for "Sino-Italian friendship" projected onto the façade. Wen also promised the Italians that he would double the annual value of trade with them by the year 2015.

By pledging to help the debt-stricken PIIGS countries, China is ultimately boosting its own industry. Beijing also expects the Europeans to be more compliant on the political front: At a summit of EU representatives in Brussels in October, Wen rejected demands to devalue the Chinese currency. China maintains an artificially low exchange rate for the yuan, also known as the renminbi. This allows the Chinese to keep their exports cheap -- including to countries in the euro zone.

During a brief visit with German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Wen secured support for a matter that he had unsuccessfully raised for years: Merkel promised that she would support China's desire to be recognized as a market economy by the EU within five years. This would make it difficult for the EU to slap anti-dumping duties on inexpensive goods from China or denounce the country on charges of forced technology transfer.

The more EU countries become financially dependent on China, the greater the risk that they will end up facing the same dilemma that America has in its dealings with China. "How do you deal toughly with your banker?" US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton wrote, according to US diplomatic cables leaked to Wikileaks.

Beijing is still discussing how much money it actually intends to invest in government bonds from PIIGS countries. The bonds are "far too risky," warns economist Yi Xianrong from the Beijing Academy for Social Sciences, the government think tank. "As long as the EU has not resolved its internal contradictions, China would be better off not buying any government bonds there."

It is only when conducting a "political bargain," says Yi, that it would be clever for China to acquire euro bonds, "but only a few." Minimal investment, maximum influence -- that's been Beijing's strategy with Europe.

Translated from the German by Paul Cohen

Article...
  • For reasons of data protection and privacy, your IP address will only be stored if you are a registered user of Facebook and you are currently logged in to the service. For more detailed information, please click on the "i" symbol.
  • Post to other social networks

Comments
Discuss this issue with other readers!
6 total posts
Show all comments
    Page 1    
1.
SPECIAL 12/16/2010
seems like China is quite stupid for investing in europe. they were better off letting europe crash and then come in afterward to scavenge off the carcas of europe. if we look at history, we can see that europe cant be trusted. they dont have any honour. furthermore, influence in europe, and other currupt countries such as south korea, japan, singapore, canada, australia cant be bought. if you look at how the usa actually influences these pupet states, then you can see it is done through force, coercion, manipulation, deceit, sabatoge, and black male. i'll use japan as my first example. the u.s. was concerned about japanese pm haytoyama. he wanted closer relations to China, and removal of u.s. troops. haytoyama was overthrown by the u.s. i;ll use italy as my next example. burlusconi wanted closer relations to russia, and even facilitated russian transfer of natural resources into europe. his penalty is seen in the wikileaks release. the corporatocracy also used the media to defame his character. you also saw how the u.s. was able to attack france for not supporting the iraq war. they called for a boycott of france, and started to call french fries, freedom fries. there also exists forceful intervention in australia, particularly when the u.s. overthrew whitlam in 1975. another real obvious example of why China should not invest in europe is because this so called "using money to buy influence" tactic had not worked in the u.s. China has invested heavily in the u.s. through purchasing treasury bonds, however, the u.s. is not only not cooperative with China, but constantly tries to sabatoge China on several fronts. there are probably a lot more than i know, but i will name a few. falun gong, tibet, taiwan. those are the consistent 3, but the u.s. has also siezed other opportunities to get india, and other Chinese neighbours to attack China; fictitious currency manipulation propaganda; instigate other countries to dispute island ownership in south east asia, through what they refer to as the "spratly islands"; encouraged viet nam to fight China; start trouble in korea via its rogue pupet state south korea to provoke north korea; through japan, start conflicts in the diao yu tai islands; done several military exercises specifically to agitate China. with the u.s., not only has buying treasury bonds not bought influence, it has also caused China a lot of grief.
2. Poor, Poor, China
muley63 12/16/2010
Zitat von SPECIALseems like China is quite stupid for investing in europe. they were better off letting europe crash and then come in afterward to scavenge off the carcas of europe. if we look at history, we can see that europe cant be trusted. they dont have any honour. furthermore, influence in europe, and other currupt countries such as south korea, japan, singapore, canada, australia cant be bought. if you look at how the usa actually influences these pupet states, then you can see it is done through force, coercion, manipulation, deceit, sabatoge, and black male. i'll use japan as my first example. the u.s. was concerned about japanese pm haytoyama. he wanted closer relations to China, and removal of u.s. troops. haytoyama was overthrown by the u.s. i;ll use italy as my next example. burlusconi wanted closer relations to russia, and even facilitated russian transfer of natural resources into europe. his penalty is seen in the wikileaks release. the corporatocracy also used the media to defame his character. you also saw how the u.s. was able to attack france for not supporting the iraq war. they called for a boycott of france, and started to call french fries, freedom fries. there also exists forceful intervention in australia, particularly when the u.s. overthrew whitlam in 1975. another real obvious example of why China should not invest in europe is because this so called "using money to buy influence" tactic had not worked in the u.s. China has invested heavily in the u.s. through purchasing treasury bonds, however, the u.s. is not only not cooperative with China, but constantly tries to sabatoge China on several fronts. there are probably a lot more than i know, but i will name a few. falun gong, tibet, taiwan. those are the consistent 3, but the u.s. has also siezed other opportunities to get india, and other Chinese neighbours to attack China; fictitious currency manipulation propaganda; instigate other countries to dispute island ownership in south east asia, through what they refer to as the "spratly islands"; encouraged viet nam to fight China; start trouble in korea via its rogue pupet state south korea to provoke north korea; through japan, start conflicts in the diao yu tai islands; done several military exercises specifically to agitate China. with the u.s., not only has buying treasury bonds not bought influence, it has also caused China a lot of grief.
Poor, poor, China. I can't believe how awful it must be for China to buy distressed assets. I can't believe the U.S would complain about buying billions worth of junk from China. It's so unfair to China that they can't have their hegemony in southeast Asia. Why can't the world see they have the right to oppress Tibet's religious freedom. It's so unfair the West would rather deal with a democratic India. What's wrong with West? Don't they know what China wants, China gets. Poor, poor, China.
3.
ulriken 01/08/2011
Zitat von muley63Poor, poor, China. I can't believe how awful it must be for China to buy distressed assets. I can't believe the U.S would complain about buying billions worth of junk from China. It's so unfair to China that they can't have their hegemony in southeast Asia. Why can't the world see they have the right to oppress Tibet's religious freedom. It's so unfair the West would rather deal with a democratic India. What's wrong with West? Don't they know what China wants, China gets. Poor, poor, China.
I guess we all got choices to make. It's called "everyone for himself". Ain't America running a hegemony in the western hemisphere too? actually I don't believe the Chinese are capable to establishing hegemony at the moment, at least not now. From what I can see, the Chinese have been on the defensive so far. There are US military bases all around China's borders eg in Kazakhstan, Afghanistan, South Korea, Japan, Philipines and etc. How many Chinese military bases are there around United States' borders? and not to mention the size of China's navy is laughable.
4.
ulriken 01/08/2011
Zitat von SPECIALseems like China is quite stupid for investing in europe. they were better off letting europe crash and then come in afterward to scavenge off the carcas of europe. if we look at history, we can see that europe cant be trusted. they dont have any honour. furthermore, influence in europe, and other currupt countries such as south korea, japan, singapore, canada, australia cant be bought. if you look at how the usa actually influences these pupet states, then you can see it is done through force, coercion, manipulation, deceit, sabatoge, and black male. i'll use japan as my first example. the u.s. was concerned about japanese pm haytoyama. he wanted closer relations to China, and removal of u.s. troops. haytoyama was overthrown by the u.s. i;ll use italy as my next example. burlusconi wanted closer relations to russia, and even facilitated russian transfer of natural resources into europe. his penalty is seen in the wikileaks release. the corporatocracy also used the media to defame his character. you also saw how the u.s. was able to attack france for not supporting the iraq war. they called for a boycott of france, and started to call french fries, freedom fries. there also exists forceful intervention in australia, particularly when the u.s. overthrew whitlam in 1975. another real obvious example of why China should not invest in europe is because this so called "using money to buy influence" tactic had not worked in the u.s. China has invested heavily in the u.s. through purchasing treasury bonds, however, the u.s. is not only not cooperative with China, but constantly tries to sabatoge China on several fronts. there are probably a lot more than i know, but i will name a few. falun gong, tibet, taiwan. those are the consistent 3, but the u.s. has also siezed other opportunities to get india, and other Chinese neighbours to attack China; fictitious currency manipulation propaganda; instigate other countries to dispute island ownership in south east asia, through what they refer to as the "spratly islands"; encouraged viet nam to fight China; start trouble in korea via its rogue pupet state south korea to provoke north korea; through japan, start conflicts in the diao yu tai islands; done several military exercises specifically to agitate China. with the u.s., not only has buying treasury bonds not bought influence, it has also caused China a lot of grief.
You may have a point to make but I suggest you learn to speak English first. you sound like a primary school kid. this won't help in a debate.
5. Clever Move: China Outmaneuvers the Western Neoliberals
onzapintada 01/12/2011
Zitat von sysopChina is seizing on Europe's debt problems to expand its influence on the continent with large-scale investments and purchases of government bonds issued by highly-indebted states. The strategy could push Europe into the same financial dependency on China that is posing a dilemma for the US. http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,734323,00.html
Clever move: China is dumping its mountains of dollar junk on Europe buying southern European EURO government bonds, and the best thing for them is that these GIPSI countries (Greece, Ireland, Portugal, Spain, maybe Italy) bonds are guaranteed by export vice champion Germany, after all. China outmaneuvers the western neoliberals provided with only limited horizons. But maybe the Western money elite will be satisfied with the same position they have granted until now to the central (and some south) American oligarchs, who may enrich themselves at the expense of their peoples as long as they do what Washington wants. Just with the difference that the new masters would be in Beijing.
Show all comments
    Page 1    
Keep track of the news

Stay informed with our free news services:

All news from SPIEGEL International
Twitter | RSS
All news from World section
RSS

© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2010
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH




European Partners
Presseurop

Politiken

Corriere della Sera

Early Election

Marines Case Stokes Italy-India Tensions


Facebook
Twitter