'Coded Language' and Yes Men: Cables of Confusion from the Heart of the Vatican
US diplomats seem bemused with the hierarchical structures and the lack of sophistication within the Vatican. Not only do most Catholic Church leaders lack an e-mail account, only a few "are aware of imminent decisions."
A month after the German Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was elected pope in the Sistine Chapel, on April 19, 2005, the US Embassy to the Vatican sent a cable to the State Department in Washington providing its first readings on what the United States and the world at large should expect from the new head of the Roman Catholic Church.
The profile drawn up by the embassy noted that the new pope had no political experience and that, owing to his age, he couldn't afford the luxury of acquiring it. But US diplomats in the Vatican could not complain about being underemployed. During the last 10 years, they've sent a total of 729 cables back to the State Department.
Sometimes, they merely tried to explain to the State Department how the Vatican functioned -- and in reports that depict a very curious world, indeed. According to a dispatch from 2009, although the church was "highly hierarchical," it was also chaotic. Likewise, it was usually the case that "only a handful of experts are aware of imminent decisions" and they normally just acquiesce to whatever their boss decides. If fact, the report continued, hardly anyone ever dared to criticize the pope or to deliver bad news to him. It was rare to find independent-minded advisers, they wrote.
Communication in 'Coded Language'
The Vatican's innermost circle is almost exclusively made up of Italian men in their 70s. The Americans wryly note that "most of the top ranks of the Vatican ... do not understand modern media and new information technologies," and that "many officials do not even have official email accounts." They also note how the Cardinal Secretary of State, the name given to the Holy See's equivalent of a prime minister, doesn't even speak English and was also considered a "yes man."
Those closest to the pope communicate among themselves "in 'coded' language that no-one outside their tight circles can decipher." The American diplomats joke, for example, about how the Israeli ambassador recently received a message from the Vatican that reportedly included something positive about his country. But since the message was written in such impenetrable language, the ambassador "missed it, even when told it was there."
Washington also seems to be particularly interested in the Roman Curia, the administrative apparatus of the Vatican, and its policies toward the Asia states it is currently at loggerheads with, including North Korea, Burma, Vietnam and, in particular, China. In a cable classified "secret" from Dec. 7, 2009, the embassy provides a detailed report on the activities of Caritas Internationalis, the confederation of Catholic aid organizations under Vatican control, in countries such as China, North Korea and Burma.
Working Quietly in China and North Korea
The regimes in these countries tolerate the work of Caritas within their borders, at least periodically, because they need the assistance. Even in North Korea, the organization quietly carries on with its charity work, which includes administering two Vatican-financed hospitals.
The US Embassy devoted a whole series of reports to the Vatican's relationship with China. Relations are reportedly very sensitive because there are two Catholic churches competing with each other in the People's Republic. On the one hand, there is the "patriotic" church supported by the communist regime. And, on the other, there is the underground church that is still loyal to Rome and is now tolerated by Beijing following years of persecution.
According to a senior Caritas official, the organization works with both churches. The Chinese government is aware of this, the official added, but the authorities still just "look the other way" whenever Caritas workers cooperate with members of the underground church.
Stonewalling the UN's Top Prosecutor
Thanks to its good ties to high-ranking Vatican officials, the US Embassy was able to provide an early and detailed warning to diplomatic headquarters back in Washington about a looming scandal involving Carla del Ponte, the Swiss woman who was then the chief UN war crimes prosecutor at The Hague.
In August 2005, del Ponte made a personal appearance at the Vatican to ask the Roman Curia to help in the apprehension of Ante Gotovina, a former Croatian general, who was being sought by The Hague for war crimes. Though he is still celebrated in Croatia as a hero, Gotovina is believed to have been responsible for atrocities against ethnic Serb civilians as part of an August 1995 offensive during the civil war that attended the breakup of Yugoslavia. Del Ponte told her hosts that Gotovina was hiding out in a Franciscan monastery in Croatia -- and accused the church of protecting him.
P 201600Z FEB 09
FM AMEMBASSY VATICAN
TO SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 1055
INFO EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE
USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY
USMISSION USUN NEW YORK PRIORITY
AMEMBASSY BRASILIA PRIORITY
AMEMBASSY MEXICO PRIORITY
AMEMBASSY BOGOTA PRIORITY
AMEMBASSY MANILA PRIORITY
TAGS: PREL, ECPS, PHUM, PGOV, KPAO, KIRF, VT
SUBJECT: THE HOLY SEE: A FAILURE TO COMMUNICATE
REF: VATICAN 25 AND PREVIOUS (NOTAL)
C o n f i d e n t i a l vatican 000028
E.o. 12958: decl: 2/20/2029
Tags: prel, ecps, phum, pgov, kpao, kirf, vt
Subject: the holy see: a failure to communicate
Ref: vatican 25 and previous (notal)
CLASSIFIED BY: Julieta Valls Noyes, CDA, EXEC, State.
REASON: 1.4 (b)
1. (C) Summary: Together with other flaps, the recent global
controversy over the lifted excommunication of a Holocaust
denying bishop (reftel) exposed a major disconnect between Pope
Benedict XVI's stated intentions and the way in which his
message is received by the wider world. There are many causes
for this communication gap: the challenge of governing a
hierarchical yet decentralized organization, leadership
weaknesses at the top, and an undervaluing of (and ignorance
about) 21st century communications. These factors have led to
muddled, reactive messaging that reduces the volume of the moral
megaphone the Vatican uses to advance its objectives. This is
especially true with audiences whose view of the Vatican is
informed largely by mass media coverage. There are signs that
at least some in the Vatican have learned their lessons and will
work to reshape the Holy See's communications structure.
Whether they'll prevail remains to be seen. End Summary.
A centralized hierarchy making decentralized decisions
2. (SBU) The Vatican is highly hierarchical with the Pope
ultimately responsible for all important matters. Yet it is
also highly decentralized in its decision-making. This
structure reflects belief in the principle of "subsidiarity":
leaving decisions to those closest to, and best informed on, a
particular matter. On a practical level, however, subsidiarity
can limit horizontal communication by eliminating peer
consultation and review. This approach also encourages a narrow
focus on issues at the expense of the big picture.
3. (C) In discussing the recent crisis with CDA and PAO,
Archbishop Claudio Celli, President of the Pontifical Council
for Social Communications, described the Church's current
communication style as being focused on the content of a
decision, rather than its public impact. xxxxxxxxxxxx, noted that this phenomenon is compounded
by the fact that officials from the various Church organs see
themselves as advocates for their issues, without considering
their impact on the Church as a whole. The result is a process
in which only a handful of experts are aware of imminent
decisions -- even major decisions with broad implications -- and
those who are become proponents, rather than impartial advisors
to the Pope.
4. (C) A series of missteps during Benedict's Papacy have made
the lack of information-sharing in the Church painfully clear.
In 2006, the Pope made a speech in Regensburg that was widely
decried as insulting to Muslims, though he later explained he
had no such intent. In 2008, the Pope himself baptized (i.e.,
converted)a prominent Muslim during the 2008 Easter Vigil
service at St. Peters, an event broadcast worldwide; the
Cardinal who runs Inter-Faith Dialogues for the Church knew
nothing about the conversion until it happened. This year,
Father Federico Lombardi, head of the Vatican press office, and
Cardinal Walter Kasper, President of the Pontifical Council for
Promoting Christian Unity, which includes relations with Jews,
learned only after the fact about the decision to reinstate
communion with schismatic Lefebrvist bishops who included a
Holocaust denier (reftel). In the midst of that scandal,
meanwhile, the Pope proposed promoting to auxiliary bishop a
priest who said Hurricane Katrina was "divine retribution" for
licentiousness in New Orleans. The resulting outcry led the
cleric to decline the offer.
A tin ear at the top
5. (C) These public missteps have intensified scrutiny of the
small group of decision-makers advising the Pope. Normally
reserved Vatican commentators have directed withering criticism
their way. George Weigel, editor of a conservative US-based
Catholic monthly, recently wrote that "curial chaos, confusion,
and incompetence" had made clear "how dysfunctional the curia
remains in terms of both crisis analysis and crisis management."
Secretary of State Tarcisio Bertone -- who is tasked with
managing the Curia and is its highest ranking official after the
Pope -- has been a particular target. xxxxxxxxxxxx, said Cardinal Bertone had "distinguished
himself by his absence" during the Lefebrvist controversy, and
that the curia had become "more disorganized than before" under
his leadership. Yet xxxxxxxxxxxxmay have understated the problem.
At the height of the Lefebrvist scandal, Bertone referred
publicly to the offending bishop by the wrong name, then
denounced the media for "inventing" a problem where there was
none. Other critics note Bertone's lack of diplomatic
experience (he speaks only Italian, for example), and a personal
style that elevates "pastoral" work -- with frequent foreign
travel focusing on the spiritual needs of Catholics around the
world -- over foreign policy and management.
6. (C) More broadly, critics point to a lack of generational or
geographical diversity in the Pope's inner circle. Most of the
top ranks of the Vatican -- all men, generally in their
seventies -- do not understand modern media and new information
technologies. The blackberry-using Father Lombardi remains an
anomaly in a culture in which many officials do not even have
official email accounts. xxxxxxxxxxxx (strictly protect)
laid even greater emphasis on the Italo-centric nature of the
Pope's closest advisors. Other than Archbishop James Harvey, an
American and head of the Papal household, there is no one from
an Anglophone country in the Pope's inner circle. xxxxxxxxxxxx few had exposure to the
American -- or, indeed, global -- rough and tumble of media
communications. The Pope's Italian advisors, xxxxxxxxxxxx, tend
towards old-fashioned, inwardly focused communications written
in "coded" language that no-one outside their tight circles can
decipher. (The Israeli Ambassador, for example, told CDA that
he recently received a Vatican statement that was supposed to
contain a positive message for Israel, but it was so veiled he
missed it, even when told it was there.)
7. (C) There is also the question of who, if anyone, brings
dissenting views to the Pope's attention. As noted, Cardinal
Bertone is considered a "yes man," and other Cardinals don't
hold much sway with the Pope -- or lack the confidence to bring
him bad news. And if bad news rarely filters out, leaks never
spring. xxxxxxxxxxxx said that under Pope John Paul II leaks
were much more common. While damaging, these leaks did allow
time for critics of pending decisions to mobilize and present
opposing views to the Pope in time. Pope Benedict and Cardinal
Bertone run a much tighter ship, xxxxxxxxxxxx, but at the expense of
squashing coordination or allow dissenting voices to be heard.
Not spin city
8. (C) As has become evident throughout the controversies, much
of the Vatican hierarchy greatly undervalues external
communication. Structurally, the Pontifical Council for Social
Communications and the Vatican Press Office are weak. The
former applies the Church's teachings to the field of
communications and is not involved in shaping the Pope's
message. The latter has the writ, but not the influence.
9. (C) Father Lombardi, the spokesman, is not part of the Pope's
inner circle. He has little influence over major decisions,
even when he knows about them beforehand. And the poor man is
terribly overworked: Lombardi is simultaneously the head of the
Vatican Press Office, Vatican Radio (which broadcasts in 45
languages), and the Vatican Television Center, literally moving
from one office to the other over the course of the day. It's a
grueling schedule on good days, and debilitating during crises.
Father Lombardi is the deliverer, rather than a shaper, of the
message. In the wake of the Lefebrvist controversy, he openly
said that the Vatican press office "didn't control the
communication." Without a comprehensive communication strategy
in which he plays a central role, he is dependent on individual
Church organs and leaders seeking his advice. It's a hit or
10. (C) There is another cost to divorcing decision-making from
public spin: the Church's message is often unclear. xxxxxxxxxxxx
candidly said that the Holy See rarely considered how best
to explain dogmatic, ecclesiastical, moral or other decisions to
a broader public. He emphasized that the content of the message
should not/not be different -- the Catholic Church would often
take positions contrary to public opinion -- but the Church
hierarchy needed to think more about how to present positions.
Cracking the real da vinci code?
11. (C) The communication culture of the broader Catholic Church
is diverse, however, with many Church-affiliated organizations
now excelling at communication. One example of a Church
organization that is using modern communications strategies to
deliver its message, interestingly enough, is Opus Dei. (Pope
John Paul II was widely perceived as being more adept at public
communications than Benedict; his communications director,
Joaquin Navarro Valls, famously belongs to Opus Dei.) CDA and
PolOff recently met with xxxxxxxxxxxx, and discussed how Opus Dei
responded to the "Da Vinci Code" - a novel which pilloried the
group. Sanchez said that Opus Dei realized it could respond in
one of three ways: (1) ignore the controversy; (2) adopt a `no
prisoners' approach and refute every error; or (3) treat the
controversy as a chance to explain Opus Dei to the world. Opus
Dei chose the third option, holding regular briefings for
journalists and others, and the organization's membership has
actually increased as a result.
Fixing what's lost in translation
12. (C) There is a growing urgency within the Vatican about the
need to change the current communication culture. The rare
public criticisms offered by Father Lombardi and Cardinal Kasper
of their colleagues' roles in the Lefebrvist scandal are an
extremely strong indicator of internal disquiet. There are a
number of proposals circulating to help fix the problem.
xxxxxxxxxxxx have confirmed privately to
the Embassy that discussions are underway about having the
Pontifical Council for Social Communications assume a greater
coordinating role on major decisions. Father Lombardi has
privately proposed to his leadership the possibility of creating
an office in the Secretariat of State to flag potentially
controversial decisions and has asked for resources to prepare
translations of major statements more quickly. Other Vatican
insiders close to the Pope have suggested bringing more native
English speakers into positions in the Pope's inner circle. And
not a few voices are calling for Cardinal Bertone's removal from
his current position.
13. (C) Behind closed doors, our Vatican contacts seems to be
talking about nothing but the need for better internal
coordination on decisions and planned public messages. Most
Church leaders recoil at the notion that they could be seen as
anti-Semitic or endorsing Holocaust denials, yet are confronting
the ugly reality that many people actually believe these notions
because of their own poor communications culture. But if or
when change will come remains an open question. The structural
and cultural roots of the current situation are deep, and will
not be easily uprooted as they are closely connected to Pope
Benedict's governing style. Similar criticism after the
disastrous Regensburg speech led to little or no change. The
percolating discussions regarding the creation of a policy
coordinating body within the curia - and other possible
solutions -- are hopeful signs. But they are not yet guarantees
that change is coming. Stay tuned. End Comment.
According to the high-ranking official, del Ponte was very aggressive when she demanded to have an audience with the pope. Even years later, the former prosecutor was still livid. In her memoirs, first published in 2008, del Ponte described how Archbishop Lajolo responded to her request: "Just come to Saint Peter's Square," Lajolo reportedly told her. He was referring, of course, to the general audience that the head of the Catholic Church holds there each Wednesday -- before tens of thousands of visitors.
© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2010
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH
A time lapse of 251,287 documents: The world map shows where the majority of the cables originated from, and where they had the highest level of classification. View the atlas ...
By its very nature, field reporting to Washington is candid and often incomplete information. It is not an expression of policy, nor does it always shape final policy decisions. Nevertheless, these cables could compromise private discussions with foreign governments and opposition leaders, and when the substance of private conversations is printed on the front pages of newspapers across the world, it can deeply impact not only US foreign policy interests, but those of our allies and friends around the world.
To be clear -- such disclosures put at risk our diplomats, intelligence professionals, and people around the world who come to the United States for assistance in promoting democracy and open government. These documents also may include named individuals who in many cases live and work under oppressive regimes and who are trying to create more open and free societies. President Obama supports responsible, accountable, and open government at home and around the world, but this reckless and dangerous action runs counter to that goal.
By releasing stolen and classified documents, Wikileaks has put at risk not only the cause of human rights but also the lives and work of these individuals. We condemn in the strongest terms the unauthorized disclosure of classified documents and sensitive national security information.