Ditching Cars for Bullet Trains: Can Obama Get High-Speed on Track?

By Philip Bethge

Part 2: Germany's Siemens Hopes for New Business

Photo Gallery: US High-Speed Rail Plans Photos

Rail experts in the US have identified about 10 corridors along which high-speed trains could theoretically run profitably. The most promising of these routes lies in the northeastern part of the country; namely between New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore and Washington, DC. Because the distances are relatively short and there is high demand, bullet trains could capitalize on their advantages in the region.

There is also a relatively urgent need for rail connections in the Midwest, for example between Chicago and St. Louis. Although flights between the two cities take just over an hour, Harnish says that delays like check-in and security can easily turn that trip into three hours. By contrast, a high-speed rail line could cover this distance in less than two. Planners believe the route could serve as many as a million passengers a year.

"In Europe we have seen that high-speed rail connections of under four hours can be competitive," says Ansgar Brockmeyer from Siemens. The high-speed line between Barcelona and Madrid, which began operating at the start of 2008, has reportedly already captured half of the market share previously held by air travel. As early as 2006, Siemens-made Velaro trains were hurtling down the line at speeds in excess of 400 kilometers per hour (250 miles per hour).

Siemens now hopes to be able to market the same model of trains in the US. Californians are renowned for being environmentally conscious and tech-savvy -- even Arnold Schwarzenegger promoted high-speed trains in California when he was the state's governor. All this has created favorable conditions for the California High Speed Rail Authority (CaHSRA), which wants to lay 1,300 kilometers of high-speed track, connecting more than 25 cities in the process. Work is due to get underway on a 100-kilometer stretch of the new line in 2012.

"Our travel time from Los Angeles to San Francisco is going to be two hours and 40 minutes, with stops," says Rachel Wall of the CaHSRA. "Anyone who has traveled that route knows that driving or flying takes longer."

Too Expensive and Too Risky

Until recently, the industry also had high hopes in Florida. The railway industry expected a call for tenders before the end of the year for the construction of a line between Tampa and Orlando. This could potentially have created thousands of jobs. However, Governor Rick Scott killed the project. Too expensive and too risky is how the Republican governor summarized it, although he has since promised to reconsider his decision.

A lot is at stake for President Obama. The bullet trains were part of his 2008 election campaign. More recently, he promoted rail projects in his latest State of the Union speech. The president fears the country could fall behind its rivals. China, for instance, plans to lay a jaw-dropping 13,000 kilometers of high-speed rail track by 2020. It's investing the equivalent of more than $300 billion in this Herculean task.

Beijing recently sacked Rail Minister Liu Zhijun after what were rumored to be allegations of corruption. The concrete beds of the tracks were apparently laid sloppily.

But this has done little to dampen enthusiasm for the program. From 2012 onward, trains should be able to catapult passengers from Beijing to Shanghai in less than five hours. Amtrak trains currently cover a similar distance between New York and Atlanta in a decidedly pedestrian 18 hours.

Rail fan McCommons blames American attitudes for the perilous state of his country's railway systems. "We have been sold this bizarre idea that only automobiles and air can take care of all our needs," he says. That's hardly surprising since two generations of Americans have grown up almost entirely without passenger trains. "It's not in their imagination to take a train," he explains.

Vice President Biden can therefore still consider himself a pioneer if he travels to work by train. He often takes the Acela Express to Washington, the only rail line in the US that's trumpeted as being high-speed.

Biden's ride covers the almost 180-kilometer route from Wilmington to Washington in 75 minutes. The average speed: About 140 kilometers per hour.

Translated from the German by Jan Liebelt

Article...
For reasons of data protection and privacy, your IP address will only be stored if you are a registered user of Facebook and you are currently logged in to the service. For more detailed information, please click on the "i" symbol.

Post to other social networks

Comments
Discuss this issue with other readers!
3 total posts
Show all comments
    Page 1    
1. The Ling Emergency
Observing 03/10/2011
James Howard Kunstler author of the book "The Long Emergency," described over and over again that the US will have to face a very dark future if they do not upgrade public transportation. He meant to repair the old trains too, keeping things simple as we have reached "peak Oil," and a time in which oil is harder to get and the paradigm of "limited growth" will just die, like any other dogma actually. Check out his blog here: http://www.kunstler.com/index.php This video is a bit older but still so valid: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1ZeXnmDZMQ he was just in the paper yesterday: James Howard Kunstler: The old American dream is a nightmare http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1ZeXnmDZMQ The reason I mention these sources is that we need to simplify. The US needs public transportation and as people will suffer for their car dependency. The rail way however, must be kept as simple as possible at this point in time. .... Quote by James McCommon, "if we want passenger rail to thrive in America, we as a society will have to pay for it. Passenger rail will never be profitable in the narrow sense that businesses are. But it will be vastly profitable to society by other measures: energy efficiency; national cohesion; private development associated with transit; and the comfort, aesthetic pleasure, and sociability that trains offer over other types of transport." http://www.energybulletin.net/53800 They don't get it in the US... they will regret that they privatized everything so much that one day they all will starve and walk on foot getting nothing done any longer. this lack of understanding about the importance of public transportation, an affordable one will one day crash their economy all together. Suburbia so sucks in the US. It only works because of the car. Now the oil prices rise as the youth of the Arab countries revolt, they soon will find out that the planet suffers from overshoot and that they won't have a future like kids in the West, and perhaps have to return to gardening at the NILE river. There will be so many revolutions as a result of this crisis, get ready! Ah, there is a humorous movie about all of this coming out, called "How to Boil a Frog" http://howtoboilafrog.com/ Anyway, the US just does not want to get it... a expensive railway system will not be able to be maintained during the coming severe crisis... Anyway, I sure wish everybody the best. And, I sure don't want to be right these days - about anything energy wise and economically.
2.
BTraven 03/10/2011
---Quote (Originally by Observing)--- James Howard Kunstler author of the book "The Long Emergency," described over and over again that the US will have to face a very dark future if they do not upgrade public transportation. He meant to repair the old trains too, keeping things simple as we have reached "peak Oil," and a time in which oil is harder to get and the paradigm of "limited growth" will just die, like any other dogma actually. ---End Quote--- The plans Obama wants to implement would not change people’s attitude to prefer travelling by car and plane to using public transport very much since only big urban centres will benefit from it while people who live in rural areas will rely on their pickups. But for a businessmen who travels regularly between N.Y. and Boston such a grand vitesse means much more comfort. It is the right step, and I hope, the plans will be implemented. Much more money is necessary to make the country more independent. I doubt whether it would ever make sense to build an high-speed line between Chicago and Los Angeles. You will take the plane, of course, but I could imagine that bio-kerosene is used as fuel very soon.
3. Rail just won't happen
sadiesunn 03/10/2011
A public transportation system is more than a new fast train. When you reach the rail station you often need to rent a car. It is cheaper and quicker to just rent the car and skip the train. My rail station gets one train daily, north and south. The train arrives and departs at 3 am. Passengers must wait until 6am for a bus, sitting outside, possibly in the rain. In urban areas it is expensive to buy homes and apartments to build rail. Europe already had rail lines, but most old rail lines in the US have been sold and developed. Rail makes sense, some day, but no one cares about it now. I will not be riding a fast train in our dense winter fog while crossing thousands of busy roads.
Show all comments
    Page 1    
Keep track of the news

Stay informed with our free news services:

All news from SPIEGEL International
Twitter | RSS
All news from World section
RSS

© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2011
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH




Graphic: Getting on track Zoom
DER SPIEGEL

Graphic: Getting on track


European Partners
Facebook
Twitter

Follow SPIEGEL_English on Twitter now: