A Week with the White House Press Corps Inside Trump's War on the Traditional Media

Since his declaration that the media is the "enemy of the people," White House correspondents have been battling to maintain their position in the new America. Trump is giving them competition by filling the press corps with trolls and a new wave of right-wing media.

By in Washington, D.C.

Only a few feet separate those in power and the people who are part of their checks and balances. Fifteen steps. Perhaps 20. They lead across a beige spotted carpet in the White House that has seen better days. A blue sliding door leads from the head of the Briefing Room where Donald Trump's spokesman, Sean Spicer, seeks each day to harmonize the president's world with reality, to the small kingdom of his support staff. With the push of a button, a further sliding door opens on the left to the West Wing, the heart of American power.

The Rose Garden is to the left and on the right is a heavily armed Secret Service man behind a desk. If you leave him and his skeptical gaze behind, you arrive at the door to the Cabinet Room and, beyond it, the Oval Office, where the president spent this afternoon in the week before last negotiating the health care reform bill.

In front of Trump's office are freshly framed and newly hung photographs of the day of his inauguration, with a picture beneath it of the crowds in front of the capital. Spicer has said that never before had an inauguration been as well-attended as Trump's. It was the first fat lie to be told by the new government, one for which Trump adviser Kellyanne Conway even came up with a new term that has come to symbolize this new era: "alternative facts."

In the press Briefing Room, located in the few square feet that separate Trump's living quarters from his office, a heated battle is currently taking place over the balance of power in the United States. At stake is the freedom of the press and the future of liberal democracy in the world. And the importance of truth as the foundation of democratic discourse. If you spend a week in the White House Press Briefing Room, you can learn a lot about how these questions are being negotiated -- between the people spinning Trump's policies and the White House Press Corps, the reporters who cover the presidency on a daily basis.

A narrow hallway leads to the right of the Oval Office to Spicer's office. The door opens and there stands Spicer, wearing a white shirt and wide tie, but no jacket. "What's up?" Upon learning his guest is from Germany, Spicer explains how he made a call that morning to his counterpart in Berlin to prepare for the chancellor's visit, which took place last Friday. He looks over at his secretary and asks, "What was the guy's name again?" She quickly looks it up. "Seibert, that's right. Nice guy!"

An Inflamed Climate

A massive television is mounted on the wall above the secretary, and the country's four major news channels are all running simultaneously. But the audio is only turned on for Fox News, the conservative broadcaster owned by Rupert Murdoch that helped over the years to create the current inflamed societal climate, without which it is hard to imagine Trump ever having been elected.

What does Spicer have to say about the relationship between the new administration and the media, which the president has described as "the enemy of the people"?

"Oh, there are always tensions between the government and the press," Spicer says, smiling. He says he makes a real effort to be friendly and that he tries to take questions from as many reporters as possible during briefings. He's open to all questions, he adds, one can't expect more than that. He says he also knows that Trump's sharp rhetoric doesn't play well with journalists. "But that just happens to be the way the president thinks." And he has reasons for thinking that way, Spicer says, noting that there are unfortunately many incorrect reports about Donald Trump and his government. "That's why we are going to fight hard against Fake News in the future."

There's that term again, one which Spicer and Trump like to drop each day in an attempt to further destroy trust in the work done by journalists. Spicer laughs and pats his visitor on the shoulder. Here in his office, without the presence of cameras, he comes across a lot more charming and chummy than he does during his almost daily appearances behind the lectern of the Briefing Room to unironically disseminate Trump's latest rallying cry. He acts as though it were all just a big game, as if there were no attempt being made to intimidate newspapers, broadcasters and their reporters. As if there were no attempt being made to destroy the consensus about what is a truth and what is a lie.

Higher Ratings than a Soap

Since Donald Trump's election, the White House briefing room has been more packed than ever before. The 49 permanent seats, which include a silver plaque at the foot featuring the name of the medium, are all filled. Double that many reporters can usually be found crammed to the sides and along the back wall. The press briefing, once a boring affair, is now broadcast live on several stations. Over 4 million people watch it each day, providing it with ratings that are better than most afternoon soap operas. Part of the attraction for viewers is the palpable tension that can be felt in the room each day -- and not only between the press and the government. The Briefing Room has also transformed into the site of a battle by the new conservative media against the journalism establishment. The divide currently being seen across the country also runs through the press corps.

When Sean Spicer enters the Briefing Room on Thursday, March 9, CNN correspondent Jim Acosta is broadcasting live on air. He is standing in front of his regular seat -- the first seat to the right in the front row -- and speaking loudly toward his camera at the back of the room. It isn't just the millions of CNN viewers who are listening to him, but also Acosta's 150 colleagues in the room. And Spicer.

"I don't want to interrupt you," Spicer says, attempting a smile. Acosta ends his segment. "You can start."

"No, no," Spicer counters. "Whenever you're ready." He grins, and this despite Acosta currently being one of the Trump administration's primary enemies. During a press conference shortly before his inauguration, Trump made a threatening gesture at him and ordered him to shut his mouth, refusing his right to ask a question with the words: "You are fake news!"

Acosta is one of the most jovial and modest reporters in the entire White House Press Corps, where ego and ability aren't always in direct proportion to one another. But these days, Acosta neither can nor wants to discuss his relationship with the government. Many other reporters are in the same position. It appears that the attempts to intimidate are having an effect.

Protected By the Constitution

If Trump and Spicer had their way, Acosta would no longer be allowed in; they wanted to ban him from the White House. But Jeff Mason, who sits next to him in the Briefing Room in the first row, second seat, went to bat for his colleague. Mason is a correspondent for Reuters and the chair of the White House Correspondents' Association, which represents the interests of the reporters covering the president here. Mason was born in Germany as the son of an American soldier and later returned for several years as a correspondent in Frankfurt and Berlin. He speaks fluent German.

"We're not the enemy of the people," says Mason, who has wedged himself into one of the narrow seats in his elegant pinstripe suit. "It isn't acceptable for the president to just say something like that. That's not OK," he says. Mason speaks quietly, trying to remain calm and even-keeled and to counter Trump's aggression with composure. His colleagues call him the diplomat. "As journalists, we have an important role for our democracy," says Mason. "It is protected by the Constitution."

Mason wages a daily battle over the degree to which this protection is still valued under the Trump administration. Even before the new president took office, it was revealed that his team was considering removing the press from their traditional rooms in the White House. Mason walks out the door of the Briefing Room and points up to a semi-circular window in the White House residence where Trump lives. Franklin D. Roosevelt's swimming pool, he says, used to be in what is today's Briefing Room. The fact that the media ultimately moved into part of the White House is a symbol of a time in which the U.S. was considered a global role model for press freedom, the separation of powers and democracy.

"I never even would have thought we would have to have a discussion about whether or not we are allowed to stay here," Mason says. His next fight was over whether reporters would be allowed to continue traveling with Trump on Air Force One. Trump and his close advisors also wanted to eliminate that tradition.

More attacks followed. Mason sought to prevent Acosta's ouster in a private conversation with Spicer, but then, three weeks ago, instead of inviting the media to the normal press conference, Spicer invited select outlets to a meeting in his office. He didn't, however, invite those outlets that have been most vocal in their criticism of the Trump administration, including the New York Times, CNN and Politico. He did, however, invite right-wing outlets like Breitbart News, the Washington Times and the One America News Network. Mason protested as did the editors-in-chief of the major newspapers and Spicer hasn't held anymore private press conferences since.

Is the Free Press Threatened?

Is freedom of the press truly under fire in the United States? And Is the president a danger to democracy? "I'd rather not comment on that," says Mason, the diplomat, and glances over to the West Wing entrance as though to ensure that none of those in power are listening. "In any case, I'm fighting to make sure that things stay democratic."

Others are less optimistic. "These attacks threaten the American democracy," says Joel Simon, who heads the Committee to Protect Journalists, an American organization that was originally founded to strengthen press freedom around the world. Now the organization's focus is largely on developments in its own country. The U.S., Simon says, had long been viewed as a beacon of light when it came to freedom of the press. That, though, has changed since Trump and his "fake news" talk, he says. "We'll be laughed at when we turn up in authoritarian states and criticize the lack of press freedom," he says. "Trump is a gift to all the autocrats and dictators of this world."

Recently, Sean Spicer has been asked almost every day about a tweet sent out by the president on Saturday, March 4, at 6:35 a.m. "Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my 'wires tapped' in Trump Tower just before the victory," he wrote. "Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!" A short time later, he added, "This is Nixon/Watergate. Bad (or sick) guy!"

It's a tremendous and unprecedented accusation of a sitting president to make against his predecessor. In the days that followed, journalists tried every day to push Spicer to share with them the evidence Trump had to back the accusation. Did the president not, after all, have access to all the information that could prove his allegation? They also asked if Spicer personally believed that Obama wiretapped Trump?

It seems safe to say that they were the worst moments for Spicer since he came on board as White House spokesman. He stuttered and his eyelids twitched. How was he supposed to explain the nonsense his boss had spewed out on Twitter early in the morning? He wriggled and tried to get rid of the issue by calling on a reporter he knew would throw him a softball question.

There is everything to suggest that Trump, who enjoys access to all intelligence information, based his claim solely on reports originating from media that promote right-wing conspiracy theories. It was the same way he arrived at his recent conclusion that Sweden is in a horrific state.

Last Thursday, after Spicer had spent a particularly long time stammering about the wire-tapping accusations, a co-worker appeared and stuck a yellow Post-it note on his lectern. Soon thereafter, he returned to the issue -- and this time he was much clearer and more decisive. Spicer is often handed notes during his briefings. The week before last, it happened twice.

Many journalists believe that Trump follows Spicer's appearances and that the Post-its are his way of intervening. And it is conspicuous that Trump rarely has meetings scheduled during the press conferences.

Trump would likely rather take on Spicer's job himself. He often complains about his spokesman's appearances, and not just about his ill-fitting suits. It has been reported that he was especially irritated about actress Melissa McCarthy's devastating parody of Spicer on Saturday Night Live, which he believed undermined his authority. For narcissists like Trump, the media remains the biggest and most important mirror, even as president.

Discuss this issue with other readers!
7 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
nsmith 03/24/2017
I don't recognize America anymore. And I don't like what I see. Donald Trump has been in office for only two months, and he, the Republicans, and Steve Bannon are dragging the country back to the Dark Ages. Everything that doesn't come from them is labeled "FAKE NEWS", but with so many lies, it's hard to tell what's real. He is not making America Great Again.
classic36benz 03/24/2017
2. Drivel
The slug, or "troll" (as he terms it) who wrote this nonsense (Marcus Feldenkirchen) should get out of Washington long enough to see how the actual people of the United States feel about our "media" and their ilk. Trump is absolutely right about this, and if the repressive government in Germany would allow a free and open press, they would also be able to discern just how corrupt and deceptive the "mainstream" media has become. And, by the way, I've lived in Germany most of my life.
Joseph P.Huber 03/24/2017
3. Trump's Well-attended Inauguration
In college--at good ole Trump U--Sean Spicer majored in photo-cropping, and he minored in near-sightedness. I wonder if the Trumpians took a trick from George W's playbook, where they filled-in the blanks by adding several groupings of very happy people. That way, you can multiply the attendance, what, five-to-teen times. And, except for the occasional person of color--perhaps Ben Carson--they all look to be in just the me state of euphoria.
jjc1 03/28/2017
4. The White House media
This story is so one-sided it must have been written by someone either in the American media or co-opted by that congregation of left-wing ideologues who have for many years managed to pull off the fiction of objectivity. Eight-five percent of them admit they vote for and contribute money to Democrats. But never mind, they blandly assert, it doesn't affect our objectivity. How could it not? During the Obama era they were derided as stenographers earnestly written down every word the garrulous president uttered during his rare press conferences. That they idolized Barrack was indisputable. Remember John McCain? He's still around, but the old war monger is slipping into irrelevance and therefore obscurity. It terrifies him! He has always been a favorite of the press for his 24/ availability for a quote of sound-byte. They loved him for this until he threw his head into the ring for the presidency, and then they turned on him like a viper. The reason: he's a Republican, or anyhow unconvincingly claims to be. Journalists have the same mindset as social workers so they like big government, socialized medicine and socialized anything else you can think of. In short, they are utterly unreliable narrators. Polling shows their reputation for honesty and believability is down around their shoelaces, meaning the American public has caught on at last. If the news media had ever been remotely fair, this so-called crisis would never have happened. As it is, the removal of their unearned privileges, access among them, was a long time coming. Too long. As for the new media, most people like them. At least their bias is out front rather than concealed. That's more honest, wouldn't you say?
saul42 03/29/2017
5. This trend is not going to stop-sadly it is a new trend
It seems like this event was purposely created to polarize the masses and it's working with such perfection that its almost shocking. Everywhere I look I see people arguing and getting into massive debates over Trump winning the presidency and the intensity of the debates has not simmered down at all. In fact, it is getting worse. I have seen couples break up over this and families develop deep rifts and what for. It seems like such a silly thing to get so emotional about, when there is nothing that most people can do to change the outcome. I am inclined to believe what the Tactical Investor has stated several times over; that this whole issue has been created to divert the masses attention while the astute players walk away with the gains.
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.