London G-20 Summit Industrial Nations Celebrate-Trillion Dollar Compromise
The G-20 members have all declared themselves winners. After much haggling and negotiations, they resolved to spend more than $1 trillion to combat the global economic crisis. Europeans, meanwhile, led by Angela Merkel and Nicolas Sarkozy, also managed to hold their ground against the US.
Gordon Brown had promised a "global New Deal," and that was what the host was determined to deliver at the end of the G-20 summit. To underline his point, the British prime minister chose rousing words for his closing G-20 remarks: "This is the day that the world came together to fight back against the global recession."
A debut on the world stage: President Barack Obama in London at Thursday's G-20 summit
And to avoid creating the impression that he was all talk and no action, Brown named numbers -- big numbers. By next year, Brown said, $5 trillion (3.7 trillion) would be pumped into markets worldwide, an "unprecedented fiscal expansion." And the G-20, he added, now plans to add another $1 trillion that will be channeled through the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank primarily to developing countries.
It was the sort of inspiring message that the British and Americans had wanted to see emerge from this G-20 summit. US President Barack Obama called the summit a "turning point" in the crisis. "After weeks of preparation ... we have agreed upon a series of unprecedented steps to restore growth and prevent a crisis like this from happening again," he said at the end of the summit. The final document, he said, serves as a good starting point for further meetings within the G-20 group. Now, he added, it will be up to the individual governments to implement their individual stimulus programs. The faster they take effect, he said, the "more all of us will benefit."
Germany, the chancellor said unconvincingly, would also benefit from the money going to emerging and developing countries, which, after all, are its trading partners. "Every country that gets back on its feet is a win for Germany," Merkel said.
A Summit of Double Messages
But the chancellor would have preferred a different message to emerge from the summit. She made her preference clear by speaking at length about progress on regulation rather than the billions in stimulus spending. She was pleased to note, she said, that tax havens will now be placed on a blacklist, and that there will be closer monitoring of all financial market institutions and products. In short, she said, she was pleased that "the profit margins and possibilities for disappearing afterwards are limited." Her most trusted ally, Finance Minister Peer Steinbrück, concurred with her position when he said that the closing document contained a "remarkable" sentence: "The era of banking secrecy is over."
To the very end, this G-20 summit remained a summit of double messages. The British and the Americans emphasized stimulating the world economy, while the Germans and the French favored more regulation. In two separate press conferences on Wednesday, Brown and Obama stated one position while Merkel and Sarkozy stated the other.
These differences remained, even after hours of summit discussions. Under these circumstances, it seemed almost comic for Merkel to have praised the "spirit of camaraderie" at the meeting. Host Brown had repeatedly appealed to the world leaders' sense of responsibility not to focus solely on their own interests. Nevertheless, this gathering of leaders worked the same way every summit works: There were disputes over wording, and each attendee paid close attention to reactions from the press at home. The meeting ended with a compromise that was more or less accepted by all. This sort of thing is commonplace in the European Union, where more than 20 nations are sometimes at odds, Merkel said dryly.
The German delegation, surprisingly enough, felt that -- given the scope of the crisis -- it was odd that the group seemed to argue over every word. For example, the attendees discussed whether it would be preferable to refer to the "failure" of the financial system or merely its "weaknesses." They eventually agreed on "failure."
The closing document is not the great step forward that Brown had touted. The $5 trillion figure he mentioned merely represents a stocktaking and seems excessive. But one thing was achieved: The group agreed that it will be important in the long term to reshape the IMF and upgrade the Financial Stability Forum into a global financial supervisory authority. The document reads much more concretely than earlier G-8 summit statements. This is because the pressure to succeed was so considerable. If the closing document were trivial, the markets would plunge, Lord Malloch Brown, a junior minister in the British Foreign Ministry, warned a few weeks ago. But now the markets are up.
It is likely that this is mainly the result of the additional $1.1 trillion that will now be pumped into the world economy. This total will be allocated as follows:
- The IMF line of credit for poor nations will be tripled from the current $250 billion to $750 billion. Half of the additional $500 billion will be available immediately, while the remainder will be added "in the medium term," the document states. The EU will contribute 75 billion ($101 billion). Japan has pledged another $100 billion (74 billion), as has the US government, although its contribution must first be approved by Congress.
- The IMF's Special Drawing Rights will be boosted by $250 billion (185 billion).
- The World Bank and the regional development banks will receive $100 billion (74 billion).
- In addition, $250 billion (185 billion) will be made available in the form of loan guarantees that can stimulate global trade through export growth.
- Part 1: Industrial Nations Celebrate-Trillion Dollar Compromise
- Part 2: Why Obama Was So Reserved