The 'Kill Team' Images US Army Apologizes for Horrific Photos from Afghanistan

The images are repulsive. A group of rogue US Army soldiers in Afghanistan killed innocent civilians and then posed with their bodies. On Monday, SPIEGEL published some of the photos -- and the US military responded promptly with an apology. Still, NATO fears that reactions in Afghanistan could be violent.

By and

The United States and NATO are concerned that reactions could be intense to the publication of images documenting killings committed by US soldiers in Afghanistan. The images appeared in the most recent edition of SPIEGEL, which hit the newsstands on Monday.

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has already telephoned with her Afghan counterpart to discuss the situation. National Security Advisor Tom Donilon has likewise made contact with officials in Kabul. The case threatens to strain already fragile US-Afghan relations at a time when the two countries are negotiating over the establishment of permanent US military bases in Afghanistan.

In a statement released by Colonel Thomas Collins, the US Army, which is currently preparing a court martial to try a total of 12 suspects in connection with the killings, apologized for the suffering the photos have caused. The actions depicted in the photos, the statement read, are "repugnant to us as human beings and contrary to the standards and values of the United States."

The suspected perpetrators are part of a group of US soldiers accused of several killings. Their court martials are expected to start soon. The photos, the army statement said, stand "in stark contrast to the discipline, professionalism and respect that have characterized our soldiers' performance during nearly 10 years of sustained operations."

Major Public Backlash

At NATO headquarters, there are fears that the coming days could see angry protests in Afghanistan or even potential attacks against NATO units. "The images have an enormous potential here in Afghanistan," one NATO general told SPIEGEL ONLINE. "Experience shows that it might take a couple of days, but then people's anger will be vented."

NATO, under the leadership of the US Army, has been preparing for possible publication of the photos for close to 100 days. In dozens of high-level talks with their Afghan partners, military leaders have sought to pursue the same strategy used by the US diplomatic corps in the case of the sensitive diplomatic cables released late last year by WikiLeaks. They warned those most directly affected and made preparations for the photos' appearance in the public sphere. This "strategic communication" was aimed at preventing a major public backlash.

The high ranks of those involved in the talks show just how seriously Washington has taken the problem. US Vice President Joe Biden recently spoke about the case with Afghan President Hamid Karzai. The head of all NATO troops in Afghanistan, General David Petraeus, likewise met with Karzai.

By apologizing and by promising that those responsible will be prosecuted, the US is hoping to prevent Karzai from making any angry public statements on the case.

Whether the effort will ultimately be successful remains to be seen. On Tuesday, Karzai is scheduled to address his country to talk about the transfer of responsibility for his country's security from NATO to Afghanistan. With him will be members of the NATO leadership and the US ambassador to Afghanistan. Karzai's address contains no mention of the so-called "kill team," but the Afghan president is notorious for being unpredictable.

Political Conflict with the US

Observers say the fact that there hasn't been any serious reaction or demonstrations so far doesn't mean the danger has passed. One fact could be that Monday is a holiday in Afghanistan. A high-ranking official in the Afghan Foreign Ministry, who is close to President Karzai, said he believed the development would trigger a serious political conflict with the US.

"I assume we won't see the full effect of this matter until tomorrow, at the very soonest, when people return to work. Many people have Monday off," he told SPIEGEL ONLINE. He said the incidents had been "too outrageous" not to spark protests. "That this is engaging people can be seen by the fact that it is already being discussed on the Internet," he added.

In neighboring Pakistan, where relations with the United States are likewise strained, officials are also watching the matter closely. "We are acknowledging it, but for now it is a matter for the Afghan government to make any charges," a spokeswoman for the Foreign Ministry in Islamabad said. The release of CIA employee Raymond Davis, who shot two men at the end of January and was let go after paying blood money, as well as the increase in US drone attacks in the western part of the country, triggered angry protests in Pakistan.

The SPIEGEL story printed on Monday includes new details about a series of murders of innocent Afghans committed by a group of US soldiers. One of the accused, Corporal Jeremy Morlock, 22, confessed to the murders three months ago. Morlock is scheduled to face a general court-martial on Thursday. In total, 12 US soldiers who were allegedly part of what has been described as a "kill team" in Afghanistan are expected to go on trial soon.

'They Mowed Him Down'

The piece in SPIEGEL reconstructs some of the atrocities and includes three previously unknown photographs. Among other things, they show two of the suspected killers posing next to a corpse. The victim in the image is Gul Mudin, an Afghan man killed on Jan. 15, 2010 in the village of La Mohammed Kalay. In total, SPIEGEL and SPIEGEL TV has obtained a significant number of photos and videos.

The suspects are accused of having killed civilians for no reason and then of trying to make it look as though the killings had been acts of self-defense. Some of the accused have said the acts had been tightly scripted.

In one incident, which has been reconstructed based on documents from the investigation, the soldiers themselves detonate a hand grenade in order to make it look like they were the subjects of an attack before killing a man. One of those who allegedly participated, Adam Winfield, 21, described the incident to his father in a chat on the social networking site Facebook. "They made it look like the guy threw a grenade at them and mowed him down," SPIEGEL quotes Winfield as having written in the chat.

In a second incident on Feb. 22, 2010, one of the members of the "kill team" who had been carrying an old Russian Kalashnikov, fired it before pulling out another gun and shooting 22-year-old Afghan Marach Agha. In a third incident on May 2, 2010, it appears that a hand grenade attack was again staged before the shooting and killing of Mullah Allah Dad.

The 12 men are also facing further charges of desecration of corpses, illegal possession of photos of corpses, drug abuse and acts of bodily injury against comrades.

-- with wire reports and additional reporting by Yassin Musharbash


Discuss this issue with other readers!
12 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
allenels 03/21/2011
1. Rogue Army Members
I am a US citizen and I have to admit that I know very little about the military. At the very least, I would hope that these identified "rogue army members" would be relieved of duty and returned to the states for military prosecution. These types of individuals should not be tolerated in our military forces, especially seeing that they have such low regard for other human beings. These types of people pose more of a safety risk for Americans world-wide more so than terrorists and terrorism.
heraldmage 03/21/2011
2. When children are brainwashed
This is what happens when children are subjected to USA military brainwashing. They make moral upstanding youth killers convincing them that the enemy aren't human but animals to be hunted. It's time we stop destroying the youth of our nations by sending them unnecessarily to war. Military operations in both Afghanistan & Iraq are not to defend our nations, but in response to well planned propaganda campaigns that have taken us down the road of continual fake wars. From the 'Cold War" to the "War on Drugs" to our current "War on Terror" all meant to create a need for huge defense budgets. All to ensure increasing profits for the military-industrial complex as well as other nation building corporations. When are "we the people" going to say enough! to power. No more senseless wars. Why when the reason for our current wars Iraq & Afghanistan were shown to be false didn't we demand military withdrawal & agree to pay reparation? Why, because corporate / government propaganda machine convinced us that civil war would break out if we left. The privileged will do anything & say to keep war & reconstruction profits. They don't care about the affects of war on the people. They see things only in terms of $ signs. If we the peoples of the earth don't take money & the privileged out of our government we will be at war forever. Isn't it time we finally ended the feudal system?
Slask 03/23/2011
3. Put the Image in context
Taking pictures of your own atrocities is nothing new, they become cherished mementos to be looked at now and then. Just look at how serial-killers collect pieces of their victims clothing or, in extreme cases bodies, so they can relive the experience. As to why theses US soldiers were doing this, I think part of the answer can be found by looking 70 years into the past. From the Abstract of the paper "Skull trophies of the Pacific War: transgressive objects of remembrance" by Simon Harrison, published in JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ANTHROPOLOGICAL INSTITUTE, 12 "...focusing on the collection of Japanese skulls as trophies by Allied servicemen in the Second World War ...such human trophy-taking tends to occur in societies, including modern states, in which two conditions hold: the hunting of animals is an important component of male identity; and the human status of enemies is denied." What this picture shows was reasonably common:
lol1232 03/23/2011
4. No excuses
Heraldmage don't make excuses for this type of behavior. These are men, not children and discipline is the operative word. I condemn the poor leadership qualities shown in the officers who were involved in this. I read that it was the "young" enlisted man who told his family of the incident and didn't agree with it [caused him stress]. It is one thing to kill or be killed when engaging in combat but to kill civilians for no cause and display such "pride" like a hunter on safari and taking a picture is unacceptable under any circumstances in the military service. This type of behavior is of a narcissistic sociopath and it worries me that they will return into society at some point. Many soldiers have participated in war that didn't stoop to such low ethics, because they took their morals learned early in life with them no matter where they were. Don't make excuses for them.
BTraven 03/23/2011
Such incidents have always happened in wars, however, with the introduction of mobile phones which had made it much easier to take pictures so the habit of photographing everything and everybody in front of you has been formed it is much more likely that cruelties like the ones committed by American soldiers in Afghanistan will be revealed. I think it would be wrong to say that this generation who fights in wars now is more brutal and inhuman than the soldiers before. In my opinion their misdoings only confirm my assumption that the poorer the people the higher the chances that soldiers who come from countries with an higher living standard will commit crimes against humanity. Some humane seem to develop such a sense of superiority that they think it is quite normal to kill innocent people.
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.