The War in Libya: Are German Soldiers Secretly Helping Fight Gadhafi?
Germany shocked the world in March went it opposed NATO action against Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi. But recently released documents show that German soldiers serving in NATO units in Italy are helping to select targets for alliance airstrikes.
A NATO bomb explodes in Tripoli, Libya, in June 2011. Are German soldiers secretly helping with NATO targeting?
German soldiers are more directly involved in NATO air attacks against military forces of Libyan dictator Moammar Gadhafi than was previously known. In response to a specific inquiry recently submitted by Hans-Christian Ströbele, a Green Party member of parliament, Germany's government acknowledged that 11 German soldiers currently stationed at NATO facilities in Italy are performing duties including ones "in the area of so-called target selection" for NATO airstrikes. However, the Defense Ministry documents obtained by SPIEGEL ONLINE also note that the German soldiers do not hold any "leadership or decision-making positions."
The German participation that Ströbele's very precise questions first brought to light once again illustrate the difficult balancing act Germany's government has to perform owing to its official stance toward the mission. Indeed, Germany's position already became tenuous, if not hollow, when it emerged that -- after having voiced such passionate opposition to the mission -- Germany was also supplying bomb parts for the Libyan war. The new details only strengthen the beliefs of those who dismiss Germany's refusal to participate in military actions as transparent political maneuvering.
Indeed, Ströbele compares this case to a previous one involving agents from the BND, Germany's foreign intelligence service. After the German government, then led by Social Democratic Chancellor Gerhard Schröder, voiced strong opposition to an American attack on Iraq, it emerged that BND agents stationed in Baghdad had provided militarily useful information to invading US forces in 2003.
Sources within the Defense Ministry say that Ströbele has struck upon a very touchy issue. People familiar with the facts say that Germany has put itself in a Catch-22 situation by politically opposing military actions against Gadhafi. "Of couse you can reject a mission on political and moral grounds," said one high-ranking government employee, "but being a NATO member gives rise to obligations that one can't simply shake off." According to the ministry document, the German soldiers and almost 250 additional ones from other NATO countries have been called upon to provide "the vital safeguarding of abilities to function and act."
As the ministry sees it, saying no to NATO would be impossible and possibly even a violation of its obligations under the NATO treaty. Likewise, the ministry stresses that the Germans serving on the military staffs in Italy have in no way been directly involved in selecting concrete targets for bombing attacks. Instead, the German soldiers have been much more involved in assessing the overall military situation by analyzing images taken from airborne surveillance sources for their strategic value. Several government officials and military officers affirm that final target selection is being handled by nations actively participating in the war, including the United States, France and Great Britain. The fact that such tasks are so crucial lends credence to their statements.
Is a Mandate Necessary?
The details could also cause the German government a major headache. Ströbele has already considered filing a case against the government before Germany's Federal Constitutional Court. As he sees it, without a mandate, the government is required to get parliamentary approval before undertaking such actions. Although having German soldiers serve on permanent NATO staffs is a routine matter, Germany's parliament still has to sign off on it in the same way it does with the mandate for the involvement of German troops in Afghanistan. Ströbele argues that the fact that the NATO staffs in Italy were specifically formed for the Libyan war means that "a mandate would have been needed for (the German) soldiers."
Other opposition figures voiced support for Ströbele's position on Friday. Gernot Erler, a prominent member of the Social Democratic Party (SPD), noted how the revelations had finally unmasked Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle's "no" to German participation in the war as a tactical election maneuver, according to the German news agency DAPD.
Likewise, Jan van Aken, the parliamentary speaker on foreign policy matters for the Left Party, labeled the activities of the German soldiers as "veiled participation in war" and called for new regulations that would require parliament to also approve deployments of German soldiers to serve on assignments at NATO command centers. "Without a parliamentary mandate," van Aken told the German news agency DPA, "the German soldiers must be withdrawn from NATO staffs."
Stay informed with our free news services:
© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2011
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH
Corriere della Sera
MORE FROM SPIEGEL INTERNATIONAL
German PoliticsMerkel's Moves: Power Struggles in Berlin
World War IITruth and Reconciliation: Why the War Still Haunts Europe
EnergyGreen Power: The Future of Energy
European UnionUnited Europe: A Continental Project
Climate ChangeGlobal Warming: Curbing Carbon Before It's Too Late