Truth or Propaganda? A War of Words over Tibet
Beijing maintains that foreign coverage of the conflict in Tibet is unfair, yet it has prevented journalists from traveling to the troubled province. Now Chinese bloggers are taking Western media to task for allegedly biased reporting.
Is this boy in Lhasa being arrested -- or escorted by Chinese authorities? This AFP photo -- a framegrab from Chinese state television -- was the subject of criticism by Chinese authorities after it was used in Western media as a symbol of the Chinese crackdown.
What Ma chose not to mention, however, is the fact that it is precisely the spin doctors of the Communist Party who have made journalistic reporting so difficult since the Tibetan unrest began. And before making his speech, Ma also insisted -- in what appears to be yet another Chinese media-relations idiosyncrasy -- that all cameras and microphones be removed from the venue. However the diplomat tried to strike a conciliatory note by reassuring his audience that all journalists would be able to "freely report" from China during the Olympic Games.
Making Do or Manipulating?
Controlling all media coverage of events in the troubled western part of the country has become just as important to the rulers in Beijing as cracking down on local revolts there. In this respect, preventing foreign reporters from doing their job has been highly effective. Journalists have had to make do with a large number of hard-to-confirm facts and ambiguous images, which automatically increases the risk of making mistakes and errors. This, in turn, has also made it easier for the Chinese authorities to accuse them of manipulation.
Foreign journalists attending a briefing in Lhasa watch a Chinese authorities' video allegedly showing a riot victim.
Beijing's version of events, though, looks very different. Chinese authorities maintain that the photo -- in reality, a screenshot from a Chinese TV broadcast -- merely shows officers escorting an individual to safety and is by no means an arrest, as was reported in a number of publications, including SPIEGEL.
From their own media, the Chinese only hear about how things in Tibet are going better than ever now and how the dark days are behind them. Otherwise, there is not a shadow of a doubt, no searching for errors in previous policies, no new strategies on how Tibetans and the Han Chinese majority can coexist more peaceably.
After some initial hesitation, the authorities are now brutally suppressing all unrest in the Tibetan province. Everyone knows that much, but that is also the only thing they know for certain. How many have died? At least 140, say Tibetan exiles, whereas Beijing puts the number near 20. As for on-the-spot reporting, it was not until nearly two weeks after the protests erupted that journalists were finally allowed -- under supervision -- to travel to Lhasa. Last Friday, foreign diplomats were let in, too.
Under such conditions, human rights activists like Kai Müller, who runs the Berlin office of the non-profit advocacy group the International Campaign for Tibet (ICT), are placing a greater emphasis on information obtained through phone calls between exiles and their relatives still in Tibet. His organization attempts "to have every important piece of information confirmed by another source." However, this only works if such research does not endanger anyone -- an unsatisfactory situation.
With meticulous detail, Chinese bloggers on Web sites like Anti-CNN.com have set out to prove that foreign media are spreading lies. Occasionally, they even find proof. For example, footage of police beating protesters in Nepal was used for a televised report about Lhasa.
The bloggers believe there are too many such instances for them to be honest mistakes: "Some countries and people don't want us to be happy and strong," wrote one.
© SPIEGEL ONLINE 2008
All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with the permission of SPIEGELnet GmbH