Philosopher Renata Salecl 'Capitalism Is Humanity's Neurosis'

Freedom is a good thing, isn't it? Not always, argues Slovenian philosopher Renata Salecl. The liberty to choose from an unlimited number of career options or coffee brands ultimately becomes a burden. Our modern capitalist society is ruled by a "tyranny of choice."

Is too much choice stressing us out?

Is too much choice stressing us out?

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Ms. Salecl, at the fast food chain Subway we have to make half a dozen decisions before we can finally enjoy our sandwich. Is that what you mean when you speak in your lectures about the "tyranny of choice?"

Salecl: I try to avoid places like Subway, and if I end up there I always order the same thing. When I speak about the "tyranny of choice," I mean an ideology that originates in the era of post-industrial capitalism. It began with the American Dream -- the idea of the self-made man, who works his way up from rags to riches. By and by, this career concept developed into a universal life philosophy. Today we believe we should be able to choose everything: the way we live, the way we look, even when it comes to the coffee we buy, we constantly need to weigh our decision. That is extremely unhealthy.


Salecl: Because we constantly feel stressed, overwhelmed and guilty. Because, according to this ideology, it's our own fault if we're unhappy. It means we made a bad decision.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: And if we make the right choice?

Salecl: In that case, we constantly feel that there's something even better hiding behind the next corner. So we are never truly content and are reluctant to settle on anything.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: "Don't let the common man decide. He's not smart enough." That argument has been used by autocrats for centuries. Do you mean to say they are right?

Salecl: No. I don't criticize political or electoral freedom, but capitalism's perversion of the concept: the illusion that I hold the power over my own life.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: But I do have that power. I can decide for myself what I want, even if the thought stresses me out.

Salecl: Not at all. A friend, who's a psychologist, told me about a patient once: a woman who was well educated, had a good job, a house and a loving husband. "I did everything right in my life," said the woman. "But I'm still not happy." She never did what she herself wanted, but what she believed society expected from her.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: So we need to be better at pursuing our personal happiness?

Salecl: Even that is an illusion. Happiness has become a bar we measure ourselves against. The world is full of women's magazines that strive to tell us what will make us happy. It's filled with Facebook status updates, telling us how much other people are making of their lives. There are even indexes evaluating how happy certain nations are. "Be happy" has become a societal imperative. If you aren't, you have failed.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: But the motto also tells everyone that they can make their own choices. That gives people greater control over their lives.

Salecl: Yes, but that's only partially true. We still can't control the consequences our choices will bring. That's the next step. Not only do we want freedom of choice, but we also want a guarantee that whatever we choose will be exactly as we envisioned it.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Why are we so afraid to just go with the flow?

Salecl: Because every time we decide for something, we lose something else. Buying a car is a great example. A lot of people not only read ratings before they buy their car but they continue afterwards -- to make sure they really made the right choice.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: If I have no choice, because I can't afford anything, will that make me happier?

Salecl: Paradoxically, no. One of the greatest gains of capitalism is that even the proletarian slave feels like a master. He believes he has the power to change his life. We are propelled by the ideology of the self-made man: we work more, we consume more and in the end we consume ourselves. The consequences are burnout, bulimia and other lifestyle diseases.

SPIEGEL ONLINE. Why do we treat ourselves so poorly?

Salecl: Sigmund Freud already discovered that suffering gives us pleasure -- in a strange masochistic way. The tyranny of choice exploits that weakness. Consumer culture exhausts us. We suffer. We destroy ourselves. And we just can't stop.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: But we aren't really the victims. After all, we created this system ourselves and as long as we keep consuming, it will continue to exist. Ultimately, capitalism only mirrors human nature.

Salecl: That's true. Freud also said we choose our own neuroses. Capitalism is the neurosis of humanity.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: There are other ways. There's a restaurant in London that only serves one dish and people are lining up outside to try it. And a company in Berlin sells T-Shirts without showing them to customers first.

Salecl: That's a clever marketing strategy. With children you can see the same thing. If you ask them at a movie theater what they want to see, they will likely be overwhelmed. On the other hand, if you say shortly before, "let's go see James Bond," they will probably say, "No, mommy, anything else, but not that." If there are no boundaries, we make our own.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Will we ever be truly free?

Salecl: No. But we can live a more relaxed life. We can accept that our decisions aren't rational, that we are always conditioned by society; that we lose something every time we choose something else, and that we can't truly control the consequences of our decisions.

Interview Conducted by Stefan Schultz


Discuss this issue with other readers!
13 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
florbnot 06/26/2013
1. interesting?
I found this article somewhat interesting, but mostly navel gazing. Happyness and choice are NOT connected. I also find it comical to suggest too much choice is bad. While that may be true, such articles never take the next step and say "ok, what next?" Do we select a "choice committee" which would have the effect of just subplanting my choice for someone elses choice...why do they get to choose? It sounds like this guy is just neurotic about choice and wants to find a societal reason to blame,other than his own quirk.
billcstf04 06/26/2013
2. Choice
your correspondent left out one major issue in her argument! If we do not make the choice then who does? That way lies tyranny, with all of the stress that capitalism brings I much prefer it to being dictated to, and the remark that big businesses are dictating to me now is not an answer! leave me with as much choice as possible please.
DarthPhallus 06/26/2013
3. thank God she was never elected to higher office
I registered a Der Spiegel account just to comment on the frankly idiotic views expressed by Ms. Salecl in this interview. "Choice is unhealthy because we feel stressed, overwhelmed and guilty". Maybe Ms. Salecl does - possibly due to her own personality quirks, but most people that I know cherish their personal freedom of choice and don't take it for granted. She wrongly projects her own ambivalence about freedom of choice onto the general populace and assumes that everyone must feel the same way that she does. But hey, she's a Marxist so she knows what's best for you because you must be too dumb to know yourself. Typical......
spon-facebook-57209207 06/27/2013
4. Spot on
Great article, Mr. Renata has definitely got it figured out. This Ayn Randian capitalism that has infected the world is nothing but an equally destructive (for happiness' sake) equal of Soviet style Communism.
tgeorge5 06/27/2013
5. Capitalism -- easy scapegoat
Better than too few choices. And we also live in a world of immense information availability. Is this too the fault of capitalism?
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.