The Hook That Hurts Scientists Tip the Scales Against Anglers


By Günther Stockinger

Part 2: A Conscious Awareness of Pain

But are fish also capable of converting their perception of these complex signals into a conscious awareness of pain? A wide range of behavioral tests at least suggest this is the case.

Rainbow trout whose lips were injected with bee venom or acetic acid ventilated vigorously with their gill covers for nearly three-and-a-half hours, stopped feeding, rocked back and forth on the floor of the tank or rubbed their lips on the glass walls. They displayed far more than just three-second reactions.

Trout that had been subjected to noxious chemicals paid little attention to a brightly-colored Lego tower introduced into their tank despite the fact that they normally avoid new objects, suggesting that their attention was dominated by pain. However, fish that simultaneously received painkillers and chemicals displayed the usual degree of caution with regard to the foreign objects -- because the morphine had apparently eliminated the pain.

A 20-strong team of experts working on behalf of the EU Commission in Brussels recently evaluated all the experiments done on the subject. Since all of the current findings on the ability of fish to feel pain are based on a limited number of species, including trout, carp, zebra fish and goldfish, the group concluded that it is not possible, for the time being, to make generalizations. Nevertheless, the experts recognized these insights into the emotional life of fish: "From studies of sensory systems, brain structure and functionality, pain, fear and distress, there is some evidence for the neural components of sentience in some species of fish."

The experts not only believe them capable of fear and pain, but also sensations of pleasure. For example, oxytocin -- often referred to as the "love hormone" -- has also been documented in fish.

Sports fishing advocates slam such statements as inadmissible anthropomorphisms. They say that human attributes have been naively attributed to animals.

Although the angling lobby can no longer deny that fish have a functioning system to detect painful sensations, they still maintain that only the highly developed cerebral cortex found in mammals is capable of producing a conscious awareness of registered pain stimuli. "There is no human-like creature hidden in a fish brain," argues US researcher James Rose, an expert often cited by the fishing industry.

"The fish's pain and suffering has not been proven," agrees Robert Arlinghaus, a fish expert at the Berlin-based Leibniz Institute for Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fishing. "We simply do not know if fish have such feelings."

Brain Fluid Swishing About

For many experts, however, the lack of a cerebral cortex no longer appears to be sufficient reason to rule out conscious awareness. Remarkable medical cases have cast doubt on the old school of thought: Neurologists occasionally report people who have only half a cerebrum. Where others have synapses chattering away, these individuals only have brain fluid swishing about -- and yet they are often highly intelligent and socially well adapted.

Other researchers are now venturing even further. They maintain that they have discovered that even invertebrates have a certain awareness of pain. Robert Elwood, an animal behavior specialist at Queen's University, in Belfast, applied acetic acid to the sensitive antennae of prawns. The crustaceans subsequently rubbed the afflicted areas for up to five minutes. According to Elwood, this reaction is reminiscent of how mammals react to pain.

Octopuses, the most intelligent of all cephalopods, may enjoy an even more diverse emotional life. These animals, which are famous for their amazing contortions, never cease to amaze researchers: They often quickly manage to figure out how to open childproof drug containers if they know that tasty treats are hidden inside, and reports of nocturnal escapes from reputedly well-secured tanks are legion. "There are a lot of reasons why people don't want to think about pain among invertebrates," says Elwood.

Hobby anglers and sports fishermen are afraid that new regulations could be introduced that would limit their fishing pleasure.

Current legislation in Germany already stipulates that anglers can only head out with a rod and reel if they are fishing for food or culling stocks to maintain healthy fish populations. Tournaments where the catch is thrown back in the water after it is weighed have been banned -- along with the use of minnows as live bait.

But fish biologists do not primarily suspect lonely fishermen on rivers and lakes of committing acts of wanton cruelty. Their attention is directed primarily at fish farms and industrial deep sea fishing.

According to Braithwaite, the zoologist in Pennsylvania, 20 years from now, roughly half of the fish we eat will be raised on huge fish farms all around the world. "If we care about protecting pigs and chickens in the industrial production of food, we shouldn't exclude fish," the researcher argues.

She also says that more attention should be given to the enormous fishing fleets that sail the world's oceans to ensure that the creatures "are quickly and cleanly killed." "Most of us," she adds, "certainly don't feel comfortable with the huge quantities of fish that slowly suffocate on the decks of ships."

Research facilities are also coming under increasing scrutiny since fish are increasingly replacing mice and rats in test laboratories. Sneddon, the fish expert in Chester, feels that it would be appropriate in the future to apply "human endpoints" to these mute creatures in experiments. Just as with mammals, she says, "scientists should therefore administer analgesia if it does not interfere with study results."

Translated from the German by Paul Cohen


Discuss this issue with other readers!
1 total post
Show all comments
Page 1
richardcrimp 03/14/2011
The information you highlight is old news and is little more than poppicock! Scientists will continue to probe, poison, stick pins into fish, to discredit angling as a pastime/sport... All the while anglers are trying to preserve and nurture aquatic habitats. Angling is very much a conservation sport/pastime, and the little 'perceived' damage we are said to inflict upon these lovely creatures, is far outweighed by the destruction of our aquatic environment through pollution, bad management, industrial and local developments etc. etc. You haven't even spelt the Lynn(e) Sneddon's name correctly! Far better for such people to stop wasting money trying to discredit angling, see the bigger picture, and realise that anglers are the custodians of the vital natural aquatic resources we ALL wish to see healthy and thriving. Wake up to the realisation that your aquatic environment is being sytemically altered and destroyed through commercial operations that couldn't care less if trillions of 'at risk' cultures are wiped out in the very near future. Take a look in "The Spiegel", stop fishing for headlines, and start trying to protect OUR oceans, seas, rivers and lakes. Richard Crimp English Carp Heritage Organisation - Thames Anglers' Conservancy
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.