A Land of Money and Fear The Swiss Vote Against 'Mass Migration'

Switzerland's economic success is enviable, yet its people fear decline. On Sunday, voters approved a plan to reintroduce immigration quotas. The move is likely to create significant problems for the country's relations with the EU -- and could be expensive.

A giant light installation of the flag of Switzerland by Swiss artist Gerry Hofstetter illuminates the north face of the Jungfrau mountain.

A giant light installation of the flag of Switzerland by Swiss artist Gerry Hofstetter illuminates the north face of the Jungfrau mountain.

A Commentary by

When a country is doing well, you can usually see it. Take Zurich, Switzerland, for example. The city has changed so much in just a few years that parts of it are almost unrecognizable. Entire new districts have sprung up with chic apartments. Office towers have shot up. Shops, restaurants and bars are full, despite the fact that a beer can be a bit steep at a price of six francs, or five euros. The people have money.

Experts are united in their opinion that this prosperity is the product of Switzerland's networked economy. The country has profited enormously from open borders and from an influx of qualified foreign workers. Indeed, the European Union is its largest trading partner. Despite this, a razor-thin majority of Swiss voted in favor on Sunday of an initiative to reintroduce restrictions to the number of foreigners allowed to live and work in the country. Some 50.3 percent of eligible Swiss voters cast ballots in favor of the initiative introduced by the right-leaning, nationalist Swiss People's Party -- rejecting immigration policies of recent years that have been highly successful.

A Contradictory Self-Image

How is this possible? One important reason is the contradictory self-image of the Swiss. Switzerland views itself as a nation forged by the will of the people -- a community that decided to come together and create a state. The truth is precisely the opposite -- the Swiss state wasn't forged by will. Switzerland's regions haven't come together because it is their inner-most wish to do so. The reasoning is more profane. The German-language areas don't want to belong to Germany, the Suisse romande don't want to be a part of France and the Ticinesi don't want to become part of Italy. Instead, they are Swiss.

But an identity built on the rejection of an alternative has its weaknesses. Ever since the charisma associated with William Tell and the Old Swiss Confederacy faded, the mythological underpinnings of oft-evoked Swiss exceptionalism have vanished. The only thing remaining to substitute for a national identify is prosperity. Being richer than those surrounding you -- it's still something.

But there's a flipside: Those who have a lot also have a lot to lose. And the prospect of having to share the francs that have piled up with immigrants can quickly spiral into existential angst. To exaggerate just a little: There wouldn't be much left in being Swiss if the country's standard of living were to regress to that of the Germans or, God forbid, the French or the Italians.

Boat Is Full Slogans

Of course, no one would dare to say that openly. Instead they use what they allege to be rational arguments, like trains that are too full, urban sprawl or congested motorways. Even liberal voters are susceptible to these kinds of the-boat-is-full slogans. The Swiss have even come up with their own politically correct term for the apparent woes caused by mass migration: Dichtestress, or "crowding stress" -- a term used in biology to describe the stress effects on animals of overcrowding. What the Swiss really mean is that they are afraid of change.

Ironically, the rural areas where many of the "yes" voters on the SVP initiative originated -- particularly in the German-speaking part of the country -- are the least effected by immigration. Residents of the large cities, by contrast, where local trains and trams might actually get a little full sometimes, largley rejected the initiative.

So what happens next? The so-called bilateral path, the country's carefully worked out relationship with the EU, which Switzerland has never sought to join, seems to have reached a preliminary end. The government in Bern will now have to attempt to renegotiate its treaty with the EU on the freedom of movement.

The End of Free Movement?

It's not as if the borders will suddenly become impermeable. German doctors, Portuguese construction workers and Italian waiters won't be forced to leave tomorrow.

But the country does plan to reintroduce quotas on the number of immigrants that can come to the country. Under the referendum, the government now has three years to implement the provisions. It is unlikely that officials in Brussels will be prepared to offer the Swiss much by way of concessions. The EU has enough of its own problems at the moment and is likely to be even less inclined to fulfill the special wishes of this island of prosperity at its center.

If the freedom of movement treaty is allowed to lapse, then other agreements between Switzerland and the EU will also have to be phased out because of their legal interconnectedness. Switzerland's membership in the Schengen area of border-free travel could also hang in the balance. Air traffic, agriculture, research and the energy industry could become the first sectors to suffer under the new isolation. It would also slam the brakes on many companies because it would limit their ability to find qualified foreign employees. It's bizarre: The Swiss are reestablishing their borders out of fear of economic decline. But it may come at a very high price.

Meanwhile, the immigration debate in Switzerland will continue, with a new, more radical initiative in the pipelines to wall the country off from the rest of the world. A group of environmental activists and growth critics want to limit immigration in Switzerland to 0.2 percent of the population each year. They hope to put the plan before voters next year. And although it is possible that the Swiss will come to realize by then that they are a part of Europe, it isn't very likely.


Discuss this issue with other readers!
30 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
fantaxico 02/10/2014
1. really?
"German doctors, Portuguese construction workers and Italian waiters won't be forced to leave tomorrow."
Kalam 02/10/2014
2. The Swiss
Will they also vote to stop the Mass Migration of Money into Switzerland too?
Aspidistra2 02/10/2014
3. Swiss Vote
It is not before time that one country had the courage to say that the Schengen Agreement is not workable. This has nothing to do with xenophobia but is only common sense and is reflecting the feelings of the indigenous population of all the countries suffering from unchecked mass immigration. I hope this is the beginning of a rethink at EU HQ if they want to avoid a crushing defeat in the next MEP elections.
peskyvera 02/10/2014
4. optional
A true sign of democracy - people given the chance to voice their opinion. The EU could learn from this. Even the biggest glass can hold only so much water. The Swiss are defending themselves and why shouldn't they. Brussels is turning into a bureaucratic dictatorship. Why is France expelling Roma people - citizens of an EU country and the press quiet about this? Good for the goose but not for the gander. What hypocrites.
rechtsami 02/10/2014
5. Swiss Immigration
Amazing, but so typically Stalinist. First, this paper posits that there is no motivation for Swiss Nationhood, or for Swiss National pride, save money. Mayhap you should speak only for yourself and your motivations. The Swiss Citizens I know are all quite proud of Switzerland, and of being Swiss. Secondly, don't the editors of this tripe think it's even a tiny, tiny bit unseemly to attack whatever doesn't conform to their ideology? I mean, this is supposed to be a "news" organization, right? How can you claim to be anything but an agit-prop arm of the socialist partei?! Citizens of a state, whether it is Switzerland, America, or Togoland, should, and in the case of a Democracy or a Republic, theoretically do, have the right to decide whom they wish to allow in their Nation. Since when do you get to decide whether or not they should?
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.