Betting the Banks Will Brexit Be End of Party for London?

London is the world's leading financial capital, ahead of New York, Hong Kong and Singapore. The city placed its bets on globalization and won, attracting both legitimate and shady business with its lax rules. A vote in favor of Brexit could jeopardize its position.


By in London

London isn't afraid to flaunt what it's got. The lawn in front of Whitehall Court shimmers in the morning sun, the facade of the Renaissance palace beams. On the other side of the Thames River, the London Eye, the colossal Ferris wheel, rises into the sky.

Mehr dazu im SPIEGEL
Heft 25/2016
Hillary Clinton muss die Welt vor Donald Trump bewahren

Down on the street stands a man who couldn't care less about his surroundings. Wearing jeans and a turquoise polo shirt, his belly protrudes slightly from his blazer. His unkempt hair is ash blond and his blue eyes are constantly in motion. Roman Borisovitch has invited us along on a sightseeing tour of London of a totally different kind.

He wants to provide a look behind London's facade -- now, as the British are preparing to vote on whether to remain a part of the European Union, and when the whole world is looking at the city with trepidation. In an aging tour bus, Borisovitch takes visitors to some of the most expensive residential buildings in London as part of what he calls "Kleptocracy tours."

Their owners are Russians, Chinese and Africans who have grown rich through corruption and exploitation. And they include places like the magnificent Whitehall Court Number 4 building, for example, where the British MI6 secret service used to operate and where a confidant of Vladimir Putin bought two apartments a few years back together with his wife valued at £11.4 million. The money is believed to have originated from dubious deals with Russian oligarchs.

That, at least, is the version told by Borisovitch, himself a Russian who has become well-known as a result of undercover reporting he did for television broadcaster Channel 4 on excesses in the London real estate market. The documentary, "From Russia with Cash," made a star of Borisovitch and embarrassed London financial elites who were presented as the minions of corrupt politicians.

"There are armies of enablers in London -- bankers, accountants, lawyers and PR agents who help the kleptocrats launder their money," says Borisovitch. "They bring it to British-controlled tax havens and back to London, where they invest it in high-end real estate. We don't need this money in London."

But the money seems to come to London on its own, both clean and dirty. As the world's most important financial capital -- ahead of even New York, Hong Kong or Singapore, and well ahead of Frankfurt -- London is a magnet for money.

'London Is Pure Capitalism'

Economically, London is as big as Sweden. It generates one-fifth of all British gross domestic product (GDP) and it is the world's largest exporter of financial services. Close to 730,000 people work in the sector in the city. Some 40 percent of global currency trading is conducted through London, with $2 trillion in volume each day.

Around 250 foreign banks have subsidiaries in London in addition to hundreds of law firms. According to the latest wealth report by residential and commercial property consultancy Knight Frank, London is the most important city for the super rich. No other major city in the world has the concentration of multimillionaires seen here.

And yet all these numbers are insufficient for showing what London really stands for. "London is pure capitalism," says Martha Boeckenfeld, head of the tradition-rich bank Kleinwort Benson.

An exploration of Canary Wharf and the loud, far-too narrow streets of the City of London, the financial district surrounding the Bank of England, combined with conversations with bankers, traders, lawyers or fund managers in the pubs at Square Mile, provides a decent look at how things are going in the world of financial capitalism today.

Both -- the financial world and its unofficial capital -- are still in a state of lasting uncertainty, even eight years after the financial crisis. They are constantly scrutinized by activists like Borisovitch, by regulators and by finance start-ups seeking to alter the landscape of the very financial system upon which London is so heavily reliant.

And now people in the British metropolis are also discussing the possibility of Brexit and the consequences it might have if the Brits vote to leave the EU on June 23. The vote is representative of a new longing to go it alone at the national level, to turn away from globalization -- a shift in thinking that could plunge London, a city that has been one of globalization's biggest winners, into an identity crisis.

London has survived wars and terrorist attacks, the stock market crash of 2001 and the global financial crisis of 2008. It emancipated itself from America and kept itself apart from the European currency system. London has adapted to all manner of political, economic and technological changes of the past decades.

The Financial World's Madonna

But one thing continued to grow even after the setbacks: The amount of money that was pouring into the city -- that was then pumped back out into the world via the London Stock Exchange or the more opaque channels of banks and asset managers and invested in whatever could provide the highest returns at that moment.

"London is for the financial world what Madonna is for pop music," says Chris Skinner, author, blogger and co-head of the Financial Services Club, a European financial industry network. He's a man who can feel London's pulse. "The city has reinvented itself over and over," Skinner explains, listing out what makes the megacity so strong: People speak English almost all over the planet, British law is acknowledged and applied in large parts of the industrialized world and London attracts talented, ambitious people. The city is both international and pragmatic.

The Royal Exchange Ground Café, located kitty-corner to the Bank of England, where Skinner is talking about the advantages of London, is one of the places where London's rise to become a global trading center began.

The merchant Thomas Gresham conceived the Royal Exchange -- today home to high-end boutiques and restaurants -- during the 16th century as London's first trading venue for stocks and other goods. As far back as 1695, Londoners complained that the business practices of the traders and brokers was loud, rude and unscrupulous.

From then on, they were required to obtain a license, but back then, as after the most recent financial crisis, the industry adapted, changed and kept going. The traders soon began meeting in the coffee houses surrounding the Royal Exchange.

Global Networking

"It was in 1698 in Jonathan's Coffee House that John Castaing first published share prices on a regular basis," says Nikhil Rathi, director of international development at the London Stock Exchange (LSE), making him something of a conceptual successor to Castaing. Today, there's no longer even a trading room at the London Stock Exchange at Paternoster Square. But its global ambitions is made clear by a giant screen in the atrium, on which trading is visualized by stars in space that flash up and disappear with surges of activity. Like London itself, the LSE has made internationalization a principle. "Open access is at the core of our strategy," Rathi says. Companies from more than 80 countries have listed their shares in London. No other stock exchange attracts more foreign companies, in part because those companies want to be accessible to the international investors who are here as well. Just under £7 trillion in assets are managed from London.

That kind of global networking is one of the reasons that Deutsche Börse, Germany's stock exchange, is merging with LSE -- in a deal announced in February -- and planning to base the headquarters of their joint holding company in London. If the fusion isn't derailed by a vote in favor of Brexit, many also expect it to give London a further boost as a financial capital.

The most important financial centers by competitiveness in 2015

1. London
2. New York
3. Hong Kong
4. Singapore
5. Tokyo
6. Seoul
7. Zürich
8. Toronto
9. San Francisco
10. Washington D.C.
... ...
14. Frankfurt

Quelle: GFCI

London's success as a financial hub has roots that go back to the Industrial Revolution, which began in Britain. It facilitated an early democratization and a level of societal openness that wasn't as developed in the rest of Europe. Given its advantageous geographical position between the east and the west and the fact it was supplied by a colonial empire built on the back of slavery, London became a massive hub for goods very early on. The financial industry simply established itself on top of those foundations.

But with the decline of British industry in the 1970s, London's rise as a financial center also appeared to have come to an end.

Financial Revolution

Margaret Thatcher set the financial sector's rebirth in motion. With her neoliberal policies, she may never have restored British industry to its former glory, but she did help create the financial revolution in Britain with the sudden "Big Bang" series of reforms liberalizing the financial sector. Thatcher provided foreign financial companies with access to the London stock exchange, loosened trading rules and embraced free markets. Some within the conservative London financial elite even thought the reforms went too far. They feared the country's Americanization.

The Americans did come, and so did the Germans and other Continental Europeans. Along with them came the victory march of the shareholder value doctrine -- the alignment of seemingly all business activities in the interests of shareholders.

London opened itself up to this culture to a greater degree than anywhere else -- aggressive investment banking, anything-goes hedge funds -- and thus became the dominant capital market in Europe.

But the "Big Bang" also brought London what people in the city dub the "Wimbledon effect" -- meaning that people there play hosts to the biggest and best competition, but seldom get top billing themselves. After "Big Bang," financial institutions from the United States, Germany and Switzerland acquired numerous British commercial banks.

"The Big Bang has forced the City to become global," says Allan Yarrow, who himself brings together both new and old London. Yarrow is an old-school banker who wears suspenders beneath his powder blue suit and amber-colored cufflinks. He comes from a family of shipbuilders and worked for a long time for Kleinwort Benson, one of the old, established London banks. Last year, he held the prestigious position of the Lord Mayor of London, the city's chief ambassador and lobbyist. During his tenure, he traveled to 28 countries to promote the British capital city, Yarrow says.

Laissez-Faire Culture

London never sat idly by waiting for the money to come in on its own. The city viewed its own financial expertise to be an exportable product. Still, London lagged behind New York as a distant No. 2 up until the end of the last century. But reactions to the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks helped London leap ahead of New York for the first time. The US tightened up its immigration rules and raised the hurdles for foreigners seeking to do business in America.

London, for its part, did the opposite, opening itself up and fostering a laissez-faire culture.

Then, though, the financial crisis of 2008 deeply shook faith in loose regulations. Banks like Northern Rock and the Royal Bank of Scotland collapsed and had to be rescued. The scandal surrounding manipulation of the Libor interest rates also exposed ties between regulators and banks that were far too tight and also became a global symbol of avarice and unscrupulousness in the industry.

London also responded pragmatically during the financial crisis, reforming the supervisory system and promoting new competition in order to break the oligopoly of the few banks that had come to dominate the market for British private customers.

One gets an impression of how the culture and balance of power in London has shifted once again when taking the Docklands Light Railway (DLR), leaving the City and heading east.

Discuss this issue with other readers!
6 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
Inglenda2 06/21/2016
1. Only international tricksters will lose!
Apart from border controls and a return to home rule, there is little reason for any great change whatsoever. The trading agreements could all remain as they now are. It is the political interference from Brussels which has caused all this mess and that could be stopped with a Brexit. All the panic now being seen is pointless, Britain did trade and had financial connections with the continent, long before the misconstruction of th EU took place. The car stickers sold in Dover, with the words, THE DOOR TO EUROPE, were once a runner. Perhaps we should be a little more positive on this matter, it is certainly not the end of the world and may well be the start of something better.
emeryderek 06/21/2016
2. The City
My understanding is that it not just the banks but the legal framework and openness to do business. London is trusted internationally by business people. Some business would be lost to the EU but The City would set new rules frameworks and regulations to suit the City rather than have EU rules. In effect it would become even more open to international business from around the world. The City has been there for hundreds of years. It won't die but it will change.
Wetoldyouso 06/22/2016
3. Propaganda from first to last . . .
I suspect REMAIN will win, albeit by a much smaller margin than anyone could have imagined a few years ago, but should BREXIT pull it out, the party that will really end is Britain having to kow-tow to Merkel and Berlin who are calling all the shots on Europe (like what happened with Turkey) that impact so many, coldly, unilaterally, and imperiously. And if REMAIN wins, one chapter will close but the next one will open: an increasingly massive, oppressive, unresponsive bureaucracy, dysfunctional, dishonest, with global corporate lobbyists flocking to it like flies to a dung heap, until eventually it does what all such entities do: sinks under its own weight and the anger it engendered, eventually collapsing the way the USSR did. Cameron should never have called a referendum. He should just have waited for the EU to be hoist with its own petard. Might have taken awhile, but inevitably, entities like this always end that way.
debbie_cordwell 06/22/2016
4. UK leading the way out
The EU is a noble concept hijacked by megalomaniacs. Disregards the Dutch NO vote on a referendum on the European constitution and renamed it the Lisbon Treaty. Who are Junker, Tusk etc? I have no clue but I did not vote for them. The British public will lead the way out of this undemocratic fourth Reich.
johnzeefrance 06/23/2016
5. Brexit, What is happening now.
I will not even go into the criminal investigations going on right now of Chritine LaGarde, (IMF), Jean Cluade Juncker (LUX), or electe. Angela Merkel (unilateral criminal actions on refugees into Europe without consulting the EU). They are the leaders that will be calling the shots. But, just keep this in mind, re Brexit. Artificial mass migration as imperial policy has a long history, and the current mass migration into Europe is the brain child of US military grand strategist Thomas P.M. Barnett. He was a strategic advisor to former US Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld and currently works with the Israeli military consultancy firm Wikistrat, a close collaborator of the US Africa Command (AFRICOM) in Stuttgart, Germany. Barnett's books 'The Pentagon's New Map' and 'Blueprint for Action' (2004, 2005) have had a major influence on US and Israeli global military geostrategies. Today Wikistrat is heavily involved in the development of 'crowd sourcing' and 'crowd leveraging' technologies, and most of the Twitter entries encouraging migrants in the Middle East and Africa to travel to Austria, Germany and Sweden come from the UK, US and Australia (Ayn Rand Institute, The Escape Institute, etc.). Barnett came up with the theory of the 'Five Flows of Globalisation' — five flows which must come about if US imperialism wants to prevail in the world of the 21st century. These involve the free flow of money, security, food, energy and people. The 'Five Flows' theory means breaking down nation-state structures and freeing up resources for pillage by US multinational corporations and hyenas of high finance. The inundation of Europe with migrants is a key feature of Barnett's geostrategic thinking: "1.5 million immigrants from third world countries to Europe every year. The result will be a mixed new population with an average IQ of 90 - too dumb to grasp anything, but intelligent enough to work." Also; do some serious reading in ref to proposed version on EU's TPP, as proposed by Obama's and world trade. It seems to be working, -well away from Civil Society.
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.