Political Crisis Corrupt Cliques Vie for Power in Romania

Romanian Prime Minister Victor Ponta has been heavily criticized for his political assault on both suspended President Traian Basescu and his country's constitution. But Basescu is no angel either. The cesspool of power and corruption in Romania is a threat to the rule of law.


Romanian Prime Minister Victor Ponta exudes tranquillity. Even when faced with the most difficult of questions from hostile journalists, he doesn't lose his cool. The 39-year-old replies with restraint, using the tried and true language of democracy, frequently flashing his broad, innocent smile.

A former state prosecutor responsible for battling government corruption, since 2010 Ponta has been head of the Romanian Social Democratic Party (PSD), the country's most powerful web of post-communists. He plagiarized large sections of his Ph.D. thesis and bolstered his resume with fictional Master's degrees. As head of Romania's government, he is now demonstrating his expertise at dismantling the rule of law.

He has only been in office since the beginning of May, but since then, Ponta and his government have been engaged in a bitter power struggle with Romanian President Traian Basescu. Using decrees that often contradict parameters delineated by the country's Constitutional Court, Basescu was suspended from his office at the beginning of July. At the end of this month, a referendum will be held that could result in the president's impeachment.

Several Romanian observers, including the Bucharest-based lawyer Laura Stefan, have referred to Ponta's actions as "very clearly a coup d'état." Stefan is a member of an independent group of experts which, on behalf of the European Union, is investigating the degree to which the rule of law is being upheld in the country. On Wednesday, the European Commission is to present its biannual report on Romania's judiciary and its battle against corruption. Stefan expects that the Commission will repeat in writing the warnings it delivered verbally to the Ponta administration last week.

A Bizarre Showdown

"No rules are obeyed here anymore," Stefan complains. "This isn't just a domestic policy problem for Romania anymore. If the EU allows this to go through, it would be a signal to all those who are opposed to the rule of law. It could affect the stability of the EU."

Even in post-communist Romania, Ponta's efforts to monopolize his power are unprecedented. The current showdown between the prime minister and the president began in early July with a bizarre argument about which of the two was authorized to represent Romania at the European Council meeting in Brussels. Romania's high court decided in favor of Basescu, but Ponta ignored the ruling and travelled to the summit anyway.

He has continued in a similar vein the rest of the month -- and the list is long:

  • he replaced the heads of both chambers of parliament in questionable proceedings;
  • the official parliamentary gazette Monitorul Oficial was placed under government control so as to better monitor the publication of laws and, thus, the timing of their entry into force;
  • when the National Council for the Certification of Titles, Diplomas and Certificates (CNATDCU) found Ponta guilty of plagiarism, he had his education minister dissolve the body;
  • he issued a decree limiting the authority of the Constitutional Court and announced that some justices would be replaced;
  • the parliament initiated impeachment proceedings against Basescu despite the Constitutional Court having found that the president did not overstep his authority;
  • the government issued a decree changing the rules governing the July 29 impeachment referendum, eliminating rules stipulating a minimum turnout. The Constitutional Court, however, disallowed the change and on Tuesday, the country's interim president, Crin Antonescu, reinstated the minimum turnout rule.

Ruling by decree is hardly out of the ordinary in Romania, and it is a practice that the EU has criticized for years. Ponta and his team, while perhaps displaying more audacity than is customary, hardly represent a fundamental shift of Romanian political culture. It has also become standard in the country that, following a shift in power, huge numbers of civil servants lose their jobs in favor of those loyal to the incoming party. As such, many politicians in the country defend themselves from losing influence by simply changing their party periodically. That, in fact, is how Ponta was able to assemble his governing majority.

'Attacking the Rule of Law'

"What we are currently experiencing is the battle between two cliques," says Romanian essayist and historian Ovidiu Pecican. "Neither of them possess legitimacy, but they are prepared to fight to the end for influence and for their existence." Pecican, who also teaches at the University of Cluj, adds: "Ponta and co. are attacking the rule of law rapidly and with force. Basescu and his people used more moderate methods to hollow it out over time."

Ponta's three-party alliance, called the Social Liberal Union, is populated by a worrying number of prominent politicians and businesspeople who are suspected of corruption, abuse of office or crime. Interim President Antonescu's National Liberal Party, for example, provides a political home to the oil magnate and billionaire Dinu Patriciu, who has successfully withstood years of investigations into allegedly corrupt privatization deals. Head of the insignificant Conservative Party, Dan Voiculescu, is a former Securitate employee who was instrumental in helping ex-Romanian dictator Nicolae Ceausescu acquire hard currency. Now one of the richest people in the country, he owns the influential television broadcasters Antena1 and Antena3.

And then there is the Social Democratic Party (PSD) of Prime Minister Victor Ponta. The party has its origins in the days following the toppling of Ceausescu in December 1989. It rapidly became a collection of former Securitate and communist party elites and is seen by many in Romania as the ultimate symbol of a corrupt oligarchy.

Ponta's political mentor, former Prime Minister and PSD head Adrian Nastase, for example, is an icon of political corruption. On June 20, he was sentenced to two years behind bars for illegal campaign and party financing practices. It was the first time in two decades that a politician of his caliber was sent to jail. In an attempt to avoid jail time, Nastase last month acted out an elaborate suicide attempt -- which merely delayed his sentence by a few days. He is now in jail.

A 'Duplicitous Scoundrel'

Nastase's sentencing, however, was the ultimate warning shot fired across the bow of Romania's corrupt elite. If someone at the level of Nastase can be thrown in jail, then it can happen to anybody. Indeed, observers believe that his sentencing is the primary motivation for the power struggle currently engaged in by Ponta and Basescu. "They are doing all they can to resist an independent judiciary," says the lawyer Laura Stefan. "They would rather that Romania was in a kind of gray area outside of the European Union."

Others are quick to warn against idealizing Basescu and his Democratic Liberal Party (PDL) in the face of the Ponta onslaught. "Basescu has played a significant role in causing the current political crisis," says the Bucharest-based political scientist Christian Parvulescu. He says that pro-Basescu sentiments coming from both Brussels and Berlin are "misplaced." Parvulescu says that "the president has an authoritarian style, makes racist and otherwise vulgar statements, has often intervened in government and parliamentary business and created a deep social divide with his austerity policies."

And there are also plenty of politicians belonging to Basescu's Democratic Liberal Party (PDL) who are suspected of corruption. Indeed, were Basescu to be voted out of office, corruption investigations into his past dealings could resume. An old real estate deal of his has come under suspicion and his role in the privatization of parts of Romania's shipping fleet has also yet to be fully exposed.

Given how much is at stake for the pair, perhaps the brutal nature of their power struggle isn't surprising. Even the otherwise calm Ponta has occasionally lost his temper in front of the television cameras. He has called the suspended president a "duplicitous scoundrel," a "scorpion that kills everything around him," the "biggest liar in Romanian history" and a "man without shame or honor." The prime minister also promised "to never again speak to this man who will ram a knife into your back as soon as you turn around."


Discuss this issue with other readers!
3 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
rose.d 07/17/2012
1. Putinescu
For years romanians complained that Basescu is, as Sueddeutche Zeitung stated in an article earlier this year, a dictator on the rise, a Putin-escu. Where were you at the time when with a corrupt right winged majority he imposed laws that favor the accumulation of power in his hands? Where was UE when this Basescu declared the free press an enemy of the State? Where were you when he closed tens of hospitals leaving people to die in front of closed hospitals? Where were you in January when thousands of people did go on the streets requiring the impeachment of this corrupt president who favored his own clique to reach incredible wealth while the common people suffered tremendously under the rising taxes and the salary and pension cuts he imposed? Where were you when cancer patients cried on the streets that this corrupt state of Basescu did take away from them not only the possibility of a treatment but also the morphine from the market so that they die like dogs? Where were you when in the most fascist way Basescu stated that elderly have to “leave the system”, meaning be exterminated? Before you accuse Ponta of plagiarism you should know that this accusation was brought forward by politically named amateurs - biologists (????)- reviewing the PhD of a law person in an illegal committee that had no saying in determining the validity of this PhD thesis - bytheway, the validity of his PhD was just confirmed by an appropriate ethics committee. I would have expected a different tenure from Spiegel and a different standard when it comes to accuracy of information.
johannos 07/18/2012
2. Bitterness
Mr. Parvulescu's (a well known leftist aficionado) statements are, as usual, a bitter disappointment! What he constantly forget to mention when evaluating the state of corruption in Romania is the endless numbers of members of the former ruling party PDL which have been either prosecuted either sentenced (for details, please see the last report on the state of Justice issued by the European Comision)! Even more important, nobody has EVER reacted to PDL members sentencing the way the present ruling party has done it when their members where involved (from public protests, threats against the judges to direct involvement into the act of justice). Bottom line, this is the major difference between the former regime of Mr. Basescu and the current regime of Mr. Ponta and Antonescu, this what all this fight is all about_: letting or not letting the justice free of any political influence!
rumanisch 07/21/2012
3. Mirrors
Thanks to Der Spiegel for an objective and fair reflection of the current situation in Romania. And for summarising so precisely the key facts and events about both parties. And of course with more impartiality than the local press in Romania. The article mirrors perfectly the events, so what can be added then? To be catchier for the international reader perhaps it could explore further into the methods that the pseudo-socialist cliques are using to take over the power. There is a danger that the methods used in Romania spread and inspire other EU countries. That are no strangers to similar power struggles anyway - perhaps not in such accelerated and accented ways. The suspended president of course is no angel himself, but that is not of importance now. The new forces attempting to take over the state are a very new and special type of bandit: many in their ranks got licenced or connected to the legal profession. Attorneys at law, prosecutors, lawyers, judges, notaries, legal aides, many with fake diplomas, or succeeding through school by being the law teacher's pet, with titles obtained by plagiarising or by attending some mock private universities. A sophisticated system insitutionalised back in the time when communist dictator Ceausescu and spouse were awarded bogus diplomas and bombastic academic titles, while they were barely literate. Some younger were advised for the past 10-15 years and formed to cross from fake-legal to real-political power. Some had no titles at the age of 50 but got them real quick from wonder lawshools. The new generation of national usurpers can now spell, but still most had to steal fake and forge their diplomas at law. Of course, not all of them, but that is what makes it all worse: that many of the corrupt are real lawyers with earned licenses. Mr. Ponta was the now-convicted-and-jailed ex-prime minister's student at the Faculty of Law in Bucharest. The board awarding him the doctoral title was made up by high ranking pseudo-social figures who ruled the country at the time. The new PM was bred in a specialised nursery of corruption. His breed have permeated the government, the Parliament and the Senate. Even if the country attempted another raising now like in 1989, it would find it very difficult to overthrow the new leadership. It would be impossible to do anything that is not or does not immediately become illegal! Any institution ruling correctly or about to is going to be dismantled by finding a loophole in a statute, law or decree. Even if all government and parliament were thrown out, they already managed to get control of the nation's assets with sealed 'confidential' contracts, offshore deals and many many legal documents with all the stamps and signatures. To reclaim the country - from either clicque - would require more than shooting guns. It would need a task force of lawyers as well to review all the contracts. And there may not be many left as most are tainted and corrupt. A few thousand people managed to confiscate an entire country, with all the seals and stamps, while 19 millions citizens watch in stupour how their fate is being made up. Hopefully the foreign press will keep reporting from Romania, perhaps the right EU bodies can step in and do more than observe, and find a way to assist the bewildered citizens of a country whose justice has been confiscated by its law. Whoever wins the power struggle now, Romania will still need a lot of aid from fellow EU members: legal aid!
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.