EU Immigration Only the Rich Are Welcome

Hundreds of poverty-stricken refugees are drowning in the Mediterranean, while at the same time, many European Union member states issue residence permits to wealthy Chinese, Arabs and Russians. Anyone is welcome who can pay the asking price.



When the shutters come up inside Latvia's immigration office at 8 a.m., they are waiting: Well-to-do Russians, Kazakhs and Chinese accompanied by their interpreters and advisors with sales contracts in hand. Some have been property owners in Latvia for just hours; many are in the capital Riga for the first time, most simply in transit. And they all want just one thing from the office: The residence permit. Their ticket to Central Europe.

The residence permit program attracts thousands of foreigners to Latvia. Hardly any of them will end up living here. But anyone who buys property worth at least 50,000 Lats (€71,000 or $96,500) in the provinces or 100,000 Lats in major cities such as Riga receives a five-year residency permit. And that means unfettered access to the border-less Schengen zone, to which 26 European states are signed up. The Latvian government introduced the controversial program to save the Baltic state's ailing property market. Now it is being mimicked by other countries in Europe.

Money in exchange for a Schengen visa -- governments in Greece, Spain and Hungary are using this offer to try and attract new investors from around the world. The model undermines Europe's strict asylum and immigration laws. And the tragedy off Lampedusa, where more than 150 Africans drowned last week when their boat caught fire and sank, has shown how morally dubious it is.

'Europe is Losing its Credibility'

Fortress Europe is rigorously defending itself from these poverty-stricken refugees: According to the United Nations Refugee Agency, some 2,000 people have perished in the Mediterranean since the beginning of 2011. All while some EU governments allow wealthy foreigners in through the backdoor.

"This is cynicism," says Karl Kopp, director of European affairs at refugee rights organization Pro Asyl. "The real refuge seekers are being repelled by any and all means. But those who have enough money are getting a free ride." It is the EU states suffering financial crises in particular who are interested in the Latvian model:

  • In Spain, a new law came into force on Tuesday that provides a residence permit to foreign investors who invest at least €500,000 in property. Real estate industry experts hope to see up to 300,000 new buyers.

  • Since the summer, Greece has been giving five-year permits to anyone investing €250,000 in property. Technically, the permits only allow non-EU citizens to spend 90 out of every 180 days in other Schengen states, but virtually no one checks this in practice.
  • Since October 2012, Portugal has been offering what the locals call a "golden visa": At least two years residency in exchange for a real estate investment of at least €500,000.
  • Hungary's right-wing nationalist government, which usually tries to keep foreigners away from precious Hungarian soil, created the "Residence Permit Bond" in July. This involves buying Hungarian government bonds in exchange for the permit. Foreigners need to pump at least €250,000 into the country; on top of which there are further charges of around €40,000 payable to dubious partner companies of the Hungarian government based in offshore tax havens like the Cayman Islands or Cyprus.

"With programs like these, Europe is losing its credibility," says Birgit Sippel, security and migration policy spokeswoman for the parliamentary group of Germany's center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD). In principle, the right of residence is a matter for individual states. "But what is happening here affects all of Europe. It cannot be that we stringently exclude one group of people while on the other hand allow all those with visas to travel around the entire Schengen area at will."

In Latvia, at any rate, hardly any of the new residents hang around for long. According to a survey carried out by the immigration department, not even a fifth of those taking part in the residence permit program are settling permanently in Latvia. The others rent their new properties out immediately, or just let them stand empty, and move on to countries like France, Austria and Germany.

"I was initially very skeptical," admits Ilze Briede, head of the department. "A residence permit has the intention that one will stay in that country." In the meantime, however, the program has gained a political consensus: It has already seen about €600 million pumped into the Latvian real estate industry.

Haggling over Schengen visas, it seems, is simply too lucrative to give up.

Discuss this issue with other readers!
7 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
High Hat 10/08/2013
The countries above aren't losing their credibility, they have lost it. This ought to be a reason to eject them from the EU. The only people who will end up profiting from this are dishonest politicians.
johann84 10/08/2013
2. Really?
So we should just let in 100 million foreigners and who will take care of them? some benefits won't help them but it would be a burden on the economy. how would you like to integrate a huge mass of newcomers ? Are you also checking other news than yours? What happend in Sweden just a few months ago?
peskyvera 10/08/2013
3. optional
Not surprising. To the Western 'Christian' culture all other cultures are second-class and unworthy. 10/08/2013
4. EU Immigrants
The issue of immigrants illegally trying to force their way into our country is not a reflection on us. The country that is responsible for this sad loss of life is the country these people are trying to leave, these countries & their governments should be held responsible.
scadams 10/08/2013
5. Canada has done the same for decades
Canada has long avoided having to pay to educate its own citizens by importing ready-trained doctors, nurses and other professionals from developing countries. It has also long allowed the rich to buy their way in by promising to bring substantial amounts of cash with them or to make substantial investments in Canadian businesses. Aside from denying opportunities for advancement by young Canadians this policy has also brought in many businessmen with highly questionable ethics. But, hey, they are generous donors to the political parties who support this kind of immigration policy, so it's alright, isn't it?
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.