A Crude Heroine Nadiya Savchenko's Assault on Ukraine's Elite


Part 2: A Disagreeable Rabble-Rouser

While in prison, she wrote her autobiography. She had always wanted to be a pilot, she writes, but first she trained as a fashion designer before joining the military as a radio operator, which was the only position available to women in the army at the time. She was nevertheless able to get accepted to the Kharkiv Air Force University. Twice, she was thrown out for being unqualified, but each time she fought her way back before ultimately becoming the first Ukrainian woman to qualify as an in-flight navigator on a combat helicopter.

In 2004, at the age of 23, she was the only woman among the Ukrainian peacekeeper contingent in Iraq. In her book, she claims she received two marriage propositions while there: A policeman allegedly offered two sheep for her hand in marriage and an Iraqi prince tried to buy her for $50,000.

The book is called "Nadiya: A Powerful Name" -- and the political elite in Kiev should have taken note. Had they done so, they would have been prepared for what is happening now. Savchenko writes of herself that she is an "uncompromising person" -- someone who relentlessly pursues her goals and doesn't let anyone knock her off course.

Now, three months after Savchenko's return, the country's political elite is in shock. They crowned a woman as a hero and she is now using the title for her own purposes. Nobody is talking anymore of "our Nadiya." Instead, they are calling her an out-of-control "torpedo," Putin's "Trojan horse" or a "traitor," with some saying she needs to be sent to a psychiatric hospital. She has gone from being a Ukrainian Joan of Arc to a kind of Ukrainian Donald Trump.

Savchenko herself isn't blameless. From the very beginning, she refused to adhere to unwritten rules -- by walking into parliament in bare feet, for example, or by not thanking the president during a reception held in her honor. And by giving interview after controversial interview, all of which have scandalized the political classes in Kiev.

'Lying, Deceit and Duplicity'

She had hardly returned before announcing that she would be happy to take on the post of president or defense minister should it be necessary. She accused fellow parliamentarians of "lying, deceit and duplicity," and said: "It disgusts me that I sit together with them in the Rada." Savchenko has criticized the fact that many members of the elite have continued to do business with Russia and that not a single chocolate factory has been converted into a munitions plant, a direct reference to Poroshenko, who owns Ukraine's largest chocolate empire. She likewise hasn't spared the "incompetent" military leadership, saying they are to blame for the army's defeats on the front. "These assholes will have to answer for it," she has said.

Savchenko also no longer limits her commentary to issues pertaining to the war in eastern Ukraine. She has commented on oligarchs, for example ("they are still in power"), and on the country's election system ("there are no fair elections in Ukraine").

But the biggest outcry came when she said that it was time to forgive those in Donbass who had rebelled against the government in Kiev, to end the blockade of the region and to initiate negotiations with the separatists -- proposals that are considered heresy in Ukraine. There will never be talks with these Kremlin puppets, wrote one of Shevchenko's fellow parliamentarians on Facebook -- nobody will negotiate with cockroaches. "You either exterminate them with gas or beat them to death with a shoe."

It has now become difficult to meet with anyone among Kiev's political elite who does not think she is a Russian spy. Denys Bohush, for example, believes that Nadiya Savchenko is a product of the Russian secret service agency FSB. A trained neurologist, Bohush was part of President Poroshenko's campaign team and says that FSB "reprogrammed" her when she was in prison, adding that Savchenko is a woman with no political education but with inflexible attitudes and that such people are easily manipulated.

Nadiya Savchenko merely laughs at the notion. "People shouldn't think that I am weak. Yes, they tried to convince me of their view of Ukraine when I was in jail. But I found their efforts absurd."

A Bull in a China Shop

One can assume that the FSB would want its agents to behave much more subtly than Savchenko does. She marches through the Ukrainian political landscape like a bull in a china shop. The question is: Does she do so out of ignorance and naiveté? Or because she wants to be provocative?

She is well aware that she has become a disagreeable rabble-rouser in the eyes of many. "Had I returned to Ukraine and praised the leadership, had I said that everything is just fine and Russia alone is to blame for all of our problems -- then I would still be their hero today," she says. "They wanted to use me as their puppet."

Savchenko says she is working extremely hard because she "wants to learn, more than anything." On a recent Monday in August, she could be found sitting in an office located on the street leading to the presidential palace. The space belongs to the Open Dialogue Foundation, a Polish organization that supports the liberalization of post-Soviet states.

That morning, Savchenko had met with delegates from the United Nations and was scheduled to meet with people from the countryside that evening. After that, at 3 a.m., she intended to travel to a small town on the Polish border. The place was hosting a trial against 21 soldiers for desertion during the fighting in Donbass, charges that Savchenko found absurd. She was then to board a plane for her first-ever trip to the United States -- at the invitation of the Ukrainian diaspora in Sacramento.

On that August afternoon, though, she was focused on spending five hours learning as much as she could. The Poles had set up a flipchart and were using drawings and diagrams to explain the relationships that various European countries have with Ukraine. Savchenko was a bit tired and suffering from a cold, so she propped up her head in her hand and looked at times as though she wasn't even listening.

But she kept making observations and comments that made it clear that her mind was not wandering. She doesn't consider the discord between Ukraine's west and east to be a clash of cultures, she said for example, but a conflict between rich and poor. She also said that she was prepared to lay flowers at a cemetery for fallen Polish soldiers, which is not at all customary. "There are some things I don't understand," she admitted during a break between sessions. "But I comprehend everything intuitively."

Nebulous and Unpredictable

She doesn't have her own family, just her mother and a sister, nor does she have a large staff, though she does keep five assistants busy. She doesn't need a husband and children, she says, and spends her evenings sitting alone and writing down her thoughts. She drafted what she wanted to say at her first press conference over the course of two days and then gave the text to her assistants for a read-through. "They crossed out a couple of expletives and fixed a few orthographic mistakes, but that's it," Savchenko says.

She has even developed her vision for her country's future, calling it the "People's State of Ukraine." Currently, she says, the country is still an oligarchy, which means that the focus must be placed on building up state structures. She envisions a republic with far-reaching local autonomy and a president with only a ceremonial role. There would also be self-defense units allowed to carry their own weapons, not unlike in Switzerland. It all sounds a bit like the island of Utopia, about which Thomas Morus wrote 500 years ago.

So will Nadiya Savchenko be the one to finally get her country back on the right track? Few speak as openly about the problems facing the country as she does. But it is also true that hardly anyone else offers the kind of simplistic, populistic solutions that she does. There's something nebulous and unpredictable about her. But if she is successful in assembling a political movement with herself at its center, perhaps even supported by Poroshenko's opponents, then she could represent a serious threat to the ruling elite.

The head of state, who once received her so opulently, hasn't spoken of her again since then and neither has her political mentor Yulia Tymoshenko. Savchenko, after all, contradicts many positions that are considered sacred to Tymoshenko's Fatherland party -- despite the fact that she represents it in parliament.

As a consequence, more organized opposition to the Ukrainian hero has begun to take shape. "Calls for revolution are damaging to Ukraine," warned one representative from Poroshenko's governing party. From Tymoshenko's camp came an appeal to Savchenko to "take a small time-out."

'A Certain Aura'

"We have red lines," says Oleksiy Ryabshun. He too is a Fatherland party representative in parliament and frequently visited Savchenko during her imprisonment in Russia. "The party paid for her lawyer during her captivity and arranged for her current status as a member of parliament. There will be a talk with her: Either she adheres to the party's fundamental positions or we will go our separate ways."

Nadiya Savchenko's response is that she represents the people in parliament and not any political party. She also says that she still plans to meet with separatist leaders in September. The national uproar in Ukraine will be significant.

But she doesn't much care. "Anyone can by physically eliminated should it become necessary," she concedes. "To do so, you only need a truck that makes a wrong turn on the street. Were that to happen to me now, nobody would believe it was an accident. I am still surrounded by a certain aura."


Discuss this issue with other readers!
4 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
verbatim128 09/07/2016
1. Down to Earth
We have little understanding and even less patience with people who refuse to follow the political script of party ideology. She will be thrown to the wolfs by the elites, but what is interesting in the article is the few snippets about what really is going on in Ukraine. Among these, it is clear that the Western-backed regime has no intention to live up to normalization of relations with the the rebels, albeit their own citizens, against whom the government of the day sent the tanks and the fighter jets in April 2014 under the pretext of fighting terrorists. Savchenko seems to me so much closer to truth and justice under all that coarse, down to earth attitude, than the entire hubris of the so-called Ukrainian Western democratic aspirations.
bubasan 09/09/2016
2. Who are The Western Observers that are worried?
'Western observers in Kiev say the former pilot has become a serious threat to the president, the government and Ukrainian political parties.' This got me thinking about who are these Western Observers. Recent stories about George Soros were lingering in my brain and sure enough there appears to be a fa to put n at least one of the 'Western Observers". First reported in June of 2015: 'The hacker group CyberBerkut has published online letters allegedly written by Soros that reveal him not only as puppet master of the US-backed Ukraine regime. They also reveal his machinations with the US Government and the officials of the European Union in a scheme where, if he succeeds, he could win billions in the plunder of Ukraine assets.' There should be an EU investigation into this and sanctions placed on Soros, to cease and desist from his illegal activities for personal gain. This sentence says it all, taking this into account along with the Western Oligarch George Soros interests, it appears that the Western Observers want what they have paid for. Unfettered access to the system.
bicester55 09/10/2016
3. Seems unlikely that she is controlled by Russia
Thanks for this article. Though, searching the internet, it is unclear what she would do were she in power it does seem unlikely to me that she is Russia's pawn. Russia has apparently been consistent in criticising her? She is a member of an out of power party so it seems sensible to rail about the failing of Poroshenko while keeping her aims somewhat hidden (like many a politician). Russia, wisely got rid of her given that by becoming an MP while in prison she gained some rights of immunity that Russia would not want to unnecessarily defy? (I am not certain about this.) It is somewhat odd that Ukraine has been happy to let the disruption in the Donbas to remain unresolved as presumably Russia gains little from its continuation either. So it does seem a valid criticism for her to rail against.
spon-facebook-10000792412 10/28/2016
4. Naydia Shavvchenko
Why do you refer to her as a crude Heroin because she's honest? No, she's not like Donald Trump she truly is for her people and she is a decent person. She is willing to die for her country. She's right the Oligarchs have rapped the country of its assets. It's a crime that many are still doing business with Russia. Putin is devastating Ukraine, killing its people and stealing their land and resources while Ukrainian Oligarchs including Poroshenko look out just for their pocketbooks. . Nadyia is wrong in trying to start another revolution in Ukraine. It might kill the country. She has a great opportunity to help Ukraine but, she needs to go about it smarter. I believe she is the Joan of Arc. The world hasn't seen such a magnificent woman maybe in hundreds of years. She is a Ukrainian Hero...one that Ukraine hasn't had in close to one hundred years. Bravo Ms Shavchenko may you learn to lead your country to peace, happiness and prosperity. That's what all Ukrainians hope for. And as far as your first commentator goes who cares if Soros wants to do business in Ukraine at least he wants to help which is more than I can say for the rest of the western countries. Soros has more money that God he doesn't need to have anymore. I believe he really wants to make a difference in the world and lots of people don't like what and who he supports or doesn't support.
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.