Opinion It's High Time for a European Broadcasting Service

Propaganda spreads faster on social media than serious information and we've just experienced what an election looks like in the post-factual world. The European Union should launch its own broadcasting channel to counter the lies, draw Europe together and defend democracy.

Could television bring Europeans closer together?
Getty Images

Could television bring Europeans closer together?

By Jakob von Weizsäcker and André Wilkens

Petra from Munich reads it on her smartphone on the metro, Gunnar from Malmö listens to it on the car radio, Maria watches it from her sofa in the evening. Kinga from Budapest trusts it if she wants to know what is really happening in Europe and the rest of the world, just like Marek from Gdansk. Angela gives interviews on it, Bono sings on it and Jamie cooks. All this in color, in 24 languages, both digital and analogue, short or long, both serious and funny, and always of the best quality. This is how we imagine the European Broadcasting Corporation (EBC), the public service media channel from and for Europe, which we propose should be launched no later than spring 2019.

But why do we even need a European public broadcasting station? Doesn't Europe have enough problems already? The refugee crisis, the euro crisis, which isn't yet over, Putin's testing of our flimsy foreign policy -- and then there is Brexit and Donald Trump. Right-wing populists are taking advantage and going mainstream.

True, we have problems but we also lack a public space where we can discuss these issues from a European perspective. We are still imprisoned in national filter bubbles. So it is no surprise that we are incapable of developing a common view, let alone coming up with real European solutions. In the long-term, European democracy will only work if it is underpinned by a European public sphere, rather than a series of fragmented national public spheres.

An Anti-Enlightenment Echo Chamber

The internet could be an ideal place for a European and enlightened public space, in principle. But instead it risks becoming an anti-enlightenment echo chamber where fact and fiction merge into some kind of post-factual universe, which produces post-factual winners like Trump and Boris Johnson.

Creating a functioning public sphere is of little interest to the click economy. Meanwhile, it destroys the economic foundations for quality journalism and calls it creative disruption. The resulting void is becoming a systemic risk to open societies, and to democracy as we know it.

Moreover, in some EU countries, even the national public spheres are under political pressure. And when pluralistic media independence disappears in countries such as Poland and Hungary, this has a direct effect on the workings of Europe.

These are precisely the reasons why we believe it is the right moment to set up a European Broadcasting Corporation in order to secure media independence and plurality in the EU, especially where it is most in danger, as well as to develop innovative digital media models that suit Europe. Put simply, the EBC is the ambition to create a digital European Airbus for a European public sphere.

So how do we get there?

First, at a time when both private and public media are facing the challenges of digital transformation, we believe that the public sector should step up financially. This means European core funding for the EBC complemented substantially by a levy on the major digital platforms such as Facebook, Google and Twitter.

Independence and Impartiality

Second, the EBC would not be, and should not be perceived to be, a propaganda instrument of the European Union. Firm safeguards will need to be put in place to ensure its independence and impartiality and this should be an integral part of its governance structure.

Third, the aim should be much more than just to establish a new media actor that tries to happily co-exist with existing private and public media. Instead, the EBC will also open up new sources of income for private quality media by acting as a platform for private journalistic content. Quite bluntly, the goal would be for the EBC to develop into a major European media platform in its own right, rather than merely supplying media content to large non-European platform providers. Data security, as well as limited and transparent advertising exposure, should be tangible competitive advantages for this European media platform. The competitors of the EBC are neither public broadcasters like Germany's ZDF and Italy's RAI nor private media like France's Le Monde and Germany's Süddeutsche, but Facebook and Google.

Fourth, the EU has 24 official languages. This is usually perceived as one of the main obstacles for a European public sphere. The EBC should face this challenge head on, reaping the benefit of the dynamic developments in machine translation technologies. Seriously investing in a multilingual medium would create spill-over effects into other economic areas and would therefore also be an important element of European innovation policy and this should not be underestimated.

Finally, the EBC's chances for success will be enormously improved if it can develop within a suitable regulatory environment. We favor an approach where major digital platform providers would have to reserve a certain percentage of their media space, say 5 percent, for EBC content (on a must-carry basis). In addition, such platforms should be levied a general fee of 5 percent on their European turnover to help fund the EBC. The present situation where the click economy thrives while undermining any reasonable business model for quality journalism and engaging in the most aggressive kind of tax avoidance planning is simply no longer sustainable.

To establish a new media company, and to attract new users from all demographic and social groups across Europe, is certainly a mammoth task, and we are well aware of this. But there is a great deal at stake. This is about identity, democracy, freedom and the future of the European model.

About the Authors
  • Delf Zeh
    Jakob von Weizsäcker, 46, is a member of the European Parliament representing the state of Thuringia for the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD). The economist is a member of the Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee. Prior to his election to the European Parliament, he worked at the World Bank in Washington, D.C., the Brussels-based think tank Bruegel and the Thuringia Economics Ministry in Erfurt.
  • André Wilkens is an author and the co-founder of the German non-profit Initiative Open Society. His book "The Discrete Charm of Bureaucracy. Good News from Europe" will be published by S. Fischer Verlag in March.

At the beginning of 2019, at the latest, the EBC should be launched, with a well-produced talk show format, a kind of European Champions League of talk shows, during which European figures discuss, argue and seek solutions. Every week in a different place in Europe and with a different audience.

The reason for this launch date is that the next European elections will take place in 2019. We just witnessed what an election in a post-factual filter bubble looks like. While not the only reason, this is a key reason why we urgently need a strong and trustworthy media to foster an enlightened and facts based European public sphere.

Discuss this issue with other readers!
2 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
JohnnyMorales 02/18/2017
1. Better late than never
The notion the West or any nation can leave the media safely in the hands of major corporations needs to be recognized for the big lie it is. Corporate media is driven by one thing profits. The role Western society has created for the free media that of te fourth estate comes with responsibilities that the Corporate media ignores constantly pursuing stories based on potential profitability. And nothing especially making sure the public is informed stands in the way of pursuing profit generating news, even when the news they report are lies created to confuse and confound the public. A year ago, the president of the American Network, CBS, admitted that then candidate Donald T. was GREAT for business even if he wasn't so good for the nation as a whole. That simple statement makes it clear why our media gave him billions of dollars in free coverage. Had there been a fully operational, funded EU News Network, it could have played a key role in informing the world, far beyond Europe. As long as there is media somewhere that focuses on informing the public, there will be people who seek it out, and effectively spread the influence of that media far beyond its intended audience. I just wish Europe had already done this, decades ago. Still without it, the lies get the most attention.
pwells1066 03/15/2017
2. An idea.
I find it interesting that these two 'liberally' minded people should propose an independent media for Europe without even a mention of the best globally known existing European broadcaster The BBC. Do these people think that Britain is not European simply because it voted not to be a part of the Brussels bureaucratic clique? Having got that off my chest, I raise the point to demonstrate that their proposal, with which I agree, needs to represent a Cultural and Civilsation ethos not a political one. Questions of funding and selection of the people doing the broadcasting will have to dealt with but I suggest a per capita levy of say one penny per head of every national who resides within the purview of the Greek/Judaic/RomanoGermanic/Frankish/Spanish and Scandanavian tradition. The initial broadcasting language will have to be English and the broadcasters themselves chosen (not like the BBC) from a narrow left of centre liberal cohort, but from the entire range of religious,ethnic political groupings within our civilisation. As to who will be on the Board of Directors, and who will be the Governor General, I leave that to other correspondents to decide.
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.