Decision Time Britain Must Choose Now If It Will Stay in Europe

For years Britain has blackmailed and made a fool out of the EU. The United Kingdom must finally make a choice: It can play by the rules or it can leave the European Union.

The EU and Britain: an unhappy couple.

The EU and Britain: an unhappy couple.


Following last week's elections for the European Parliament, Europe finds itself at a historical turning point. It faces two questions. The first is that of how seriously the European Union is about its promise to become more democratic. The second is whether Britain can remain a member of the EU.

The extent to which those two questions are inextricably linked became clear last week when Prime Minister David Cameron refused to recognize the results of the European election and nominate winner Jean-Claude Juncker as president of the European Commission, the EU's executive. Most countries and leaders in the European Council, the powerful body representing EU leaders, had previously agreed to this procedure. It was a significant promise to the people of Europe -- they were to be provided with a greater say and they were supposed to be given a sign that their vote counts, that it has concrete effects. But Cameron threw a spanner in the works.

The crisis in European democracy is also the consequence of an unsettled relationship. Both the EU and Britain have perceived their relations as a burden in recent years. People in Brussels suffer under a London that is constantly thwarting European unity, that has slammed the brakes on progress and has doggedly prevented a deepening of relations.

The Tipping Point

In Britain, people suffer under the EU itself. It is a chronic suffering, one without any prospects of relief. During the May 25 European election, the anti-EU UKIP party garnered 27.5 percent of the vote, making it the strongest British party in the new European Parliament. And this, despite the fact that Britain's other political parties -- with the exception of the Liberal Democrats -- are about as EU-friendly as Germany's euroskeptic AFD.

Great Britain and the EU are like a couple that make each other unhappy but shy away from doing anything about it.

To be sure, it would be a tragedy if Britain were to leave the European Union -- a political, economic and cultural loss. Indeed, the British are to be credited with much of that which makes the Continent so special today and of which people are so proud. They introduced democracy at a time when absolutism prevailed in Europe. They showed us the advantages of an economic liberalism that, despite all its weaknesses, ultimately transformed Europe into a prosperous Continent. At all times, the British have provided us with cultural enrichment.

However, Great Britain has never had an appetite for European integration. The prevailing perspective in London is that the EU should be a glorified free-trade zone -- at best a loose alliance of states, but don't mention the term political union.

There are selfish and nationalist reasons for this, but they are insufficient for explaining the phenomenon. It isn't geography -- the fact that the country is an island -- that makes the United Kingdom an exception. The country also possesses a different political culture. For the British, who have never even drawn up their own constitution and instead rely on a collection of sundry documents to apply rule of law, the EU's stringent regulations remain alien today. In addition, one must not forget the fact that Britain wants to maintain a special relationship with the United States, one that is also intended to provide a counterweight to the European Union.

Enough Is Enough

Regardless, Europe has taken British sensitivities and particularities into account for long enough. The EU has allowed itself to be blackmailed and made to look like a fool time and again. It was patient to the point of self-denial. For decades England was forgiven for every veto it cast; every special wish was granted. When Margaret Thatcher shouted in 1984, "I want my money back," the EU granted her the "British rebate," which the country still profits from today. None of this did anything to change the Brits' view of things, and the country is more distant from the EU today than it has ever been.

The time has now come for a clarification. And it's even possible the European Union will have to decide what is most important: a more democratic Europe or having Britain remain a member. This clarification must come now -- with the appointment of the future European Commission president. It's a decision which cannot wait until 2017, the year by which David Cameron has said he will hold a referendum on Britain's EU membership.

The EU cannot allow itself to be blackmailed by the British for another three years and refuse to give the people of Europe what was assured to them before the election -- that they could use their vote to determine the next president of the European Commission. If the EU doesn't fulfill that promise, it will lose all credibility and acceptance.

This decision is due to be made at the next EU summit in June. At the summit, EU leaders must fulfill their promise and nominate Jean-Claude Juncker, even if that creates even greater difficulties for Cameron back home and even if he threatens to withdraw his country from the EU. The EU should implement the convictions of a majority and not those that are acceptable to one member state. Britain can then decide how it wants to respond to this new situation in Europe -- whether it wants to go along with it or if it wants to leave.

Britain is important to be sure. But the choice between a more democratic EU and Britain's continued membership is clear. Europe must choose democracy.

Discuss this issue with other readers!
122 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
pthep 06/03/2014
When the UK voted to join a Common Market it was never imagined here that the EU would become the political behemoth it is today. The plan was for a free trade area, not a United States of Europe. I can understand certain European stares wanting that, but it was never going to wash for the UK. We have forever etched in our minds Gordon Brown skulking alone in a room, all by himself and a day late signing the Lisbon Treaty without reference to the electorate in (another) clear breach of his promises. I think it's a bit rich suggesting that we don't stick to the rules. We only have to look across the channel to our protectionist neighbours to see where the rule bending goes on, whether it's to do with 'sheep meat' or strategically important yoghurt!
waverider1 06/03/2014
2. Nobody....
....needs to make a fool out of the EU. the EU does this itself, every day, every week. A bunch of Eurocrats are lying systematically to the people, dreaming about a united Europe and other plain illusions like this. Time to move, UK, the sooner you leave and the more countries that will sooner or later join you, the better. The EU in the present form is at the end of the road, only its functionaires and politicians from yesterday's world do not admit to ths, even though they know it exactly!
jdevans2020 06/03/2014
3. The EU
I have never read such rot in my life, if you want more democracy close the European Parliament now, I voted in 1975 to join a common market, there was no mention of political union, If there would have been we wouldn't have joined, we have been dragged deeper in by corrupt politician's to suit there own ends, what the people of this country voted for was a common market and that's all we want..
harm.hoekstra 06/03/2014
4. False Dichotomy
"...[T]he European Union will have to decide what is most important: a more democratic Europe OR having Britain remain a member." Huh? IF the EU were more democratic, in the sense of real functioning parliament and chosen commissioners (secret back room voting does not count), if the EU were more democratic, the British would be less appalled by its machinations and UKIP would not have been as big as it is now. So the sentence should read: "if only the European Union would reform drastically into a more democratic Europe, Britain would remain a member". Furthermore, "Great Britain has never had an appetite for European integration. The prevailing perspective in London is that the EU should be a glorified free-trade zone [not a] political union. There are selfish and nationalist reasons for this..". The main objective of a nation is to look at its self interest. If the EU does bring more prosperity and safety to a country, it would be in that country's self interest to join the EU. Or is the author aware that joining the EU means supporting the poorer southern countries indefinitely, making the EU a transfer union? By labeling Britain's attitude and actions as selfish, the author admits Britain is better off out. ~Harm.
shoreham55 06/03/2014
5. uk in eu
The Common Market was a political arrangement even though politicians tried to pretend it wasn't. Too many politicians still do not understand wgat the EU is so it is easy to peddle myths.
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.