Poll Plummet What Happened to Germany's Green Party?

Just two years ago, it looked like Germany's Green Party was going to challenge the Social Democrats for the honor of being the country's second largest party. Now, poll numbers suggest only one in 10 voters will support them. What went wrong?

Getty Images


It was an astounding result. In April of 2011, a political survey found that fully 28 percent of German voters supported the Green Party, well more than the center-left Social Democrats. Immediately, pundits began writing about a new Volkspartei, that uniquely German term which implies a big-tent, yet cosily familiar, political party.

But there was one problem. Elections were still more than two-and-a-half years away. And now, with the vote two-and-a-half weeks away, the picture is not nearly as rosy. A poll released Thursday found that just 10 percent of Germans intend to vote for the Greens on Sept. 22. It is the lowest survey result for the once popular party since way back in 2009.

So what happened? Party leaders such as Jürgen Trittin have tried to shrug away the poll numbers. "I would advise waiting serenely for what happens on Sept. 22," he said on Thursday.

But the newest survey is not an outlier. The Greens have been consistently bleeding support ever since the spring of 2011. Along the way, they have achieved a few notable successes in state elections, but the trend has been a downward one for over two years. It is as if the German electorate has suddenly decided that the party is no longer needed.

Making Strides

Political pundits, of course, won't go quite that far, but they do point to the fact that many core Green issues have become mainstream in recent years. And much of that is thanks to Chancellor Angela Merkel and her Christian Democrats (CDU). She has proven expert at borrowing political demands from other parties and then taking the credit for implementing them. When it comes to policy areas near and dear to the Green heart, the list is long: pacifism, the nuclear energy phase-out, gender equality and expanded childcare. On every single one of those issues, Merkel's administration has made strides.

"The Greens are worried," says Ulrich Eith, director of the Baden-Württemberg Institute for Political Education. "It is certainly nice for them that progress has been made on their issues, but it was the CDU that made it happen. All they can now say is, 'but we are the original.'"

Merkel's political opportunism, however, is only one part of the equation. Recent history is equally important. The peak of the Greens' survey powers came just weeks after the massive tsunami struck the east coast of Japan on March 11, 2011, leading to the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Given that the Green Party emerged from the anti-atomic energy movement in the 1980s, it is hardly surprising that Germans' deep fear of unchecked nuclear radiation manifested itself in a burst of support for the environmental party.

Furthermore, Merkel's government was floundering badly at the time, seemingly more interested in bickering than leading. Many voters, says Eith, were searching for a place to register their protest. Supporting the Greens seemed just the thing.

"The competition was terrible," notes Gero Neugebauer, a political scientist at the Free University in Berlin. "The SPD was terrible and the Left Party, my God! That helped the Greens."

First Time Ever

The party was able to capitalize on its popularity too. On March 27, the Greens scored 24.2 percent in a state vote in Baden-Württemberg, beating out even the Social Democrats. That state now has a Green governor, Germany's first ever.

But did they draw the wrong conclusions? Even as Merkel's government spent the last two years systematically implementing some of the Greens' central demands -- beginning, most spectacularly, with the decision taken in early June of 2011 to phase out nuclear energy by the beginning of next decade -- the Greens seemed to begin preparing for a future as Germany's third large political party. Certainly in the run-up to this year's election, the Green Party tried its hand at policy proposals far outside of its normal sweet spot.

Its success has been modest. One of the party's central proposals in the current campaign, for example, has been that of raising taxes on high earners and introducing a 1.5 percent tax on assets of over €1 million as a way of increasing social justice. To be sure, many of the party's core voters support such a proposal, despite being in the upper tax brackets themselves. But it seems poorly designed should the Greens be interested in getting their new supporters to actually cast a ballot for the party on Sept. 22. Other proposals have likewise fared poorly.

"I think the Greens share some guilt (for their lower poll numbers)," says Neugebauer. "Their efforts to gain competence in other fields have distracted attention from their own key issues. It has diluted them significantly."

In addition, the Greens lack a campaigner of the caliber of Joschka Fischer, the party's widely respected éminence grise who served as Germany's foreign minister in the government of Gerhard Schröder from 1998 to 2005. The current top pairing of Trittin and Katrin Göring-Eckardt has failed to generate much excitement, both of them having been part of the party leadership for years. Trittin, for his part, has managed to do little more than deliver the perfect symbolic photo for the party's recent troubles by capsizing in a canoe during a July campaign event.

'A Large Consensus'

Most of all, though, it could be that the Greens' return to earth is simply a function of the election cycle. It is often the case that governing parties lose support during the term, only for voters to return as the next election nears. For opposition parties, the opposite is true.

And in this election season, notes Eith, controversy is largely absent. "The differences between the parties are not fundamental at the moment," he says. Nobody wants to send soldiers abroad. Nobody wants to go to Syria. Nobody wants to make significant changes to our economy. No party, except for the Alternative for Germany, wants to get rid of the euro. There is a large consensus."

Such an atmosphere, he adds, provides voters with little incentive to change parties from the last time around.

Neugebauer agrees. "The anger is gone," he says. "At a time when people look around and see things going well, they tend to go back to the big parties."


Discuss this issue with other readers!
4 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
danm 09/06/2013
1. optional
I have two quotes to share. The first is by the noted philosopher, Kermit the Frog, who said "It ain't easy being green". The second quote is from the movie Fletch II (Fletch Lives) where Chevy Chase's title charater said "I believe in a God that doesn't need heavy financing". Basically that is the problem for the greens. Everyone likes the idea of clean air and clean water. That is like trying to convince men to like pretty women. It's a very easy sell in the abstract. But now the Greens, rightly or wrongly, are being judged by massively expensive failures such as carbon trading and giant windmill farms and ecologically dubious biofuel schemes. Does anyone remember the plan to have Europe finance massive solar farms in the North African desert and transporting the energy back to Europe. Costly and not to practical given the political instability in the region. To a large segment of the population the eccentric plans and schemes of the greens are starting to look like an indulgence we cannot afford for a "solution" that is likely to fall below everyone's expectations.
hello.neoscosmos 09/07/2013
2. The Green Party in Germany
If Green parties worldwide do their jobs well, they are working for their own demise. Does this mean that progress has been made in Germany?
Jim in MD 09/09/2013
3. Public Piety
It is becoming apparent to ordinary Germans that the Green's public piety over energy will cost ordinary Germans a lot. It is not yet clear whether the new green energy technologies and current power grid will handle it well. If the Greens had a robust political solution to multicultural friction, the rise of temporary workers, or other German concerns; then they could campaign on a bigger platform. However, the Greens largely have sold themselves on one issue: the environment. It might not be enough for voters.
danm 09/09/2013
4. optional
The Green Party has seemed misguided from the start. Look at the rare earth metals used in high performance batteries. Minning these items is incredibly toxic. Just because the poison is being localized to China does not make it truly green. And without high tech batteries, most of our renewable forms of energy become less practical. Oil, natural gas, coal, nuclear and rare earth metals are all heavy polluters and between them it covers all forms of energy production except for hydro power which has it's own environmental impact. To me, the green energy movement was never much more than an expensive, impractical choice of asthetics by an ill-informed public. It was an indulgence of a more prosperous time and will not survive in a period of scarcity.
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.