NSA Spying in Germany How Much Did the Chancellor Know?

While the Chancellery appears to be outraged by the NSA's spying tactics in Germany, the opposition doubts the revelations came as a surprise to Angela Merkel. Just how much could she have known?

The question on the minds of many Germans: Is the chancellor feigning ignorance about US spying in their country?

The question on the minds of many Germans: Is the chancellor feigning ignorance about US spying in their country?


German Chancellor Angela Merkel will have to be pretty clear with US President Barack Obama the next time she has him on the line. At least that's a reasonable assumption, based on the anger she has expressed about American spying operations in the European Union and Germany.

"I demand an explanation, Barack," the chancellor might say. After all, the president eloquently defended the Prism program on his recent visit to Berlin, but the Americans' bugging, electronic eavesdropping and excessive data collection from allied European countries, which came to light this weekend, was not part of the conversation. Merkel is said to be quite rankled.

But others say that the chancellor will probably be friendly to Obama during their next talk, and not because this is what diplomatic conventions call for, even amid tensions. No, it's because there is some question as to whether Berlin's dismay about the espionage by the National Security Agency (NSA) is really as great as it claims. Could some of the indignation be feigned? Did the revelations really shock the chancellor? And if it did come as a surprise, has German counterintelligence failed miserably?

The opposition doesn't believe that Merkel was unaware of the situation. In an editorial for the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung this week, Sigmar Gabriel, chairman of the center-left Social Democratic Party (SPD), openly aired the suspicion that Merkel was familiar with at least some of the spying activity. The government has vehemently rejected this accusation as crude campaign bluster. This isn't totally unjust -- the opposition has seized on the opportunity to portray Merkel as a traitor to citizens' freedoms, a strategy that could gain support among a population particularly sensitive to data protection issues.

Who Informs Who?

The election campaign aside, there are good reasons to ask critical questions of not just the Americans, but the German government too. Intelligence expert Erich Schmidt-Eenboom says that Gabriel's suspicion is "at least tendentially" correct. "According to my estimation, the authorities knew about this," he told broadcaster Deutschlandfunk.

That's because the Federal Office for Information Security (BSI), which is responsible for protecting government networks, compiles threat analyses for the Interior Ministry. And adversaries include "not only China or Russia, but also the Anglo-Saxon services," Schmidt-Eenboom said. Additionally, Germany's foreign intelligence agency (BND) is familiar with the capacities of allied intelligence agencies, he added. In turn, the BND briefs the Chancellery, or more precisely its chief of staff, Ronald Pofalla, who is responsible for coordinating the intelligence agencies. He then shares this information with the chancellor when he sees fit.

On Wednesday, Pofalla is to sit before the Parliamentary Control Committee of the Bundestag for a question and answer session. The heads of the three German intelligence agencies -- responsible for foreign, domestic and military intelligence -- were also invited to the special session. The questions there will probably follow the same line of logic: How much did the German agencies know about the activities of their American counterparts? How much would they like to know? And could it be that German counterintelligence is not functioning? The SPD, however, cannot hide behind Merkel's conservatives. After all, it was current opposition leader Frank-Walter Steinmeier who occupied Pofalla's post from 1999 to 2005, in the delicate time after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, when US intelligence agencies were certainly not idle.

One thing is obvious: No one believed that the NSA was steering clear of Germany. When it comes to the war on terror, Germany has frequently benefited from the work of American spies. The information that led to the 2007 capture of the so-called "Sauerland cell" came from the NSA and CIA, which had intercepted phone calls and emails. Even if the partner services don't normally get to see the raw data, the Germans should have been able to figure out that the Americans could only collect this information through very comprehensive surveillance.

The Wednesday Phone Call

Why ask questions if the cooperation is working? Merkel knows that the US is extremely sensitive when it comes to national security. But she must also know, at least since the Wikileaks revelations three years ago, that the Americans are not here just to search for terrorists. It was then brought to light that the US Embassy was relying on insiders for information about the goverment coalition negotiations in 2009. This wasn't espionage, but it showed that Washington is interested in information from Europe's innermost circles of power.

But the chancellor may have been alarmed to find out that such information can also be obtained through targeted wiretapping, as documents leaked by whistleblower Edward Snowden now reveal in the case of several EU delegations. This also explains why keeping quiet about the NSA scandal is not an option for her, especially given the upcoming election in September.

On Wednesday, Merkel may have the opportunity, as announced, to speak to Obama personally by phone about the espionage allegations. That's when the US president returns from his seven-day Africa trip. There's no doubt that Obama will express polite understanding for the worries of the Germans. But it's highly doubtful that any fundamental changes will be made regarding American intelligence practices.

The US president turned the tables once more on Monday in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: "In European capitals, there are people who are interested in, if not what I had for breakfast, then at least my talking points," said Obama, in reference to the current activities of other countries' intelligence agencies.

In other words, what's all the fuss?


Discuss this issue with other readers!
11 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
greanknight 07/03/2013
1. Anti-terrorist espionage versus Economic Espionage
The crucial thing is not "there was spying on terrorists suspects". The crucial thing is there was spying on allied people, allied organizations and allied governments to extract commercial secrets, bargaining positions and technology. This stuff isn't being gathered by accident. You don't need to capture and contain 30 days of the internet traffic between the EU and USA to follow a few hundred terrorist suspects. You do not bug the offices and meeting rooms of EU trade negotiators to find Islamic terrorists.
greanknight 07/03/2013
2. Did Merkle know that Germans were being targeted
Did Merkel know that Germans were being targeted, not because they were terrorist suspects, but because they were human? Did Merkle know that Germans were being targeted because they were international negotiators for their government or their employer? And now some speculation about US goals with their widespread capture of so much data from all possible sources: Did Merkle know that Germans were being targeted so that Intel and Motorola could gain the technological secrets of Siemens? Did Merkel know that Germans were being targeted to gain personal information that could be used to persuade them if they ever rose to positions of power?
mjcoun 07/03/2013
3. Asylum
Do the right thing Mutti and give Snowden asylum.
peterboyle.4848 07/03/2013
4. Brave New World
So, is this what it has come to? Hard won democracy and freedom are now third place finishers against Business and 'Security'? The Wall only fell a short time ago, have we forgotten the dangers? Above the Secret Courts, assinations, and theft of data, the more present danger is that the mass of metadata will yeild the 'dirty little secrets' of people in power in Europe who are then subject to blackmail by the holders of that data. Just how strong will any Trade Deal be against targeted blackmail of those writing and enforcing that deal? Unless we get over American inspired paranoia about 'terrorists', the truth will never be known. Unless there is a full Public Inquiry we will never know who knew what when. Merkel, of all people, should know the dangers of Secret Courts, blanket spying, and Targeted Assasination. She lived under it. Did she lose a clear vision of the line between 'pragmatism' and 'freedom'? Between a paranoid government and a free people?
antonyabbott 07/03/2013
5. Shitstorm on the horizon.
Germany is part of the same spy network & yes your government knew about, authorized it & participated in it . Bundesnachrictendienst (BND) and Spanish CESID jointly operated an undersea cable tapping station at Conil called Operation Delikatesse. Spain and Germany had the same deal as GCHQ and NSA at [the spy station] Bude, Cornwall with their Project TEMPORA. In the words of a former NSA agent "I can't understand how Angela Merkel can keep a straight face, demanding assurances from [Barack] Obama and the UK while Germany has entered into those exact relationships,"
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.