Declassified Documents NSA Wanted To Collect Geolocation Data

The White House had to declassify NSA documents once again this week. The papers show that the NSA also wanted to collect and save mobile phone location information domestically and may already be doing so.

Apple got into trouble two years ago for tracking geolocations of its iPhone users. Is the NSA doing the same?

Apple got into trouble two years ago for tracking geolocations of its iPhone users. Is the NSA doing the same?


At the very latest, it's been clear since the scandal surrounding spying on Chancellor Angela Merkel's mobile phone that when American intelligence services comment on their practices, every single word has meaning. If an official says, for example, "We don't do that and we will not do so in the future," it could well mean, "We did that up until now."

In that light, one statement written by the NSA in secret documents declassified in redacted form by the US government on Monday seems of particular interest. In the 2010 document, a staff member for a US senator on the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence asked the agency to "Please clarify when NSA can collect FISA geolocation data, either through telephony or Internet."

In other words, the senator wanted to know if, in addition to telephone and Internet metadata, the US intelligence agency was also tracking the location of everybody who has a mobile phone or Internet connection. FISA is a reference to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, which permits US intelligence agencies to undertake certain types of eavesdropping and data collection within the scope of the law.

'Exploring the Possibility of Acquiring Such Mobility Data'

The NSA's answer is long and convoluted, and at least 13 lines have been blacked out in the published version. Near the very end, though, the official who provided the answer gets to the point:

"With the exception of test data sampling acquired from one provider, NSA does not currently obtain cellular mobility data (cell site location information) pursuant to this Court-authorized program."

But in this case, the addition of the concrete program -- referring to the FISA program of collecting telephone and Internet metadata -- is at the very least odd. The reason is that it opens up the possibility that the NSA may long have been collecting geolocation data based on other legal bases. The answer also includes another potentially explosive sentence right at the end:

"NSA is, however, exploring the possibility of acquiring such mobility data under this program in the near future under the authority currently granted by the Court."

In this instance, the court is a reference to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, the secret court charged with critical oversight of the government's FISA spying programs.

Did NSA Implement Program in 2010?

The document indicates that the NSA already had concrete plans in 2010 to save the geolocations of all mobile phone and Internet users in the United States in addition to the connection data for phone calls, emails and Internet connections. Apparently officials didn't feel additional laws were needed for monitoring that kind of data. Equipped with this power, almost every movement of every single mobile phone user in the United States could be captured for years at a time. The NSA currently saves metadata for at least five years.

There are indications the NSA already implemented its bold plan since that answer in 2010. In a September hearing of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Democratic Senator Ron Wyden repeatedly asked NSA chief Keith Alexander if his agency was collecting location information from mobile devices. Alexander once again answered by providing another qualifier. "Under Section 215," Alexander responded, "NSA is not collecting cell site data."

The Section 215 Alexander was referring to is part of the so-called Patriot Act. Again, Alexander dodged giving a clear and unambiguous answer by attaching a qualification - he said the NSA does not collect such data under one concrete passage of one specific law. He didn't say: "No."

But Wyden refused to let Alexander get away with this evasion. "I'm asking: Has the NSA ever collected or ever made any plans to collect cell site information. That was the question we still respectfully have not gotten an answer to. Could you give me an answer to that?"

This time Alexander dodged the question. "What I don't want to do, Senator, is put out in an unclassified forum anything that's classified here."


Discuss this issue with other readers!
3 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
Inglenda2 11/19/2013
1. Was it a scandal to spy on Mrs. Merkel's mobile phone?
The written Constitution is full of loopholes. Article 10, paragraph 2, allows foreign organisations to spy on German citizens, if this is thought, by the authorities concerned, to increase security. The guarantees given in paragraph 1, as in a number of other articles, are therewith in practice worthless and only intended to tranquillise the common people .
gerhard38 01/28/2014
2. optional
One can only hope that Obama and his spy organizations will choke on the data they collect worldwide and that the world will see the American government organizations for what they are, arrogant lawless violators of human rights which should be treated as pariahs worldwide.
ivh79x 02/03/2014
3. optional
I think the USA uses its spying stuff for far more than just thwarting terrorist activity. I have a friend who tends to be quite smart and very intuitive and posts a lot of things, visits a lot of foreign news sites and has been "blocked" out or receives messages that the sites are not available. This only happens from his personal computer. He has several systems that he uses. I believe that Google is in cahoots with the us feds and their two enormous barges are being used for things that are far more nefarious than they say. I think google is working with the US to geo locate people using the google systems. I don't really totally trust either of them. I know there is a lot of validity in tracking and collecting communications on suspected evil doers, but I'm positive the US is doing far more than that.
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.