World from Berlin Old Egypt Makes a Comeback

With violence escalating in Egypt, top Western diplomats are calling for calm and for national unity talks in the deeply divided country. Editorialists at leading German papers fear a vicious cycle of violence is returning to one of the Middle East's most important countries.

The Muslim Brotherhood called for new protests across Egypt against the interim government on Thursday, simultaneously announcing it would organize a march through Cairo in the afternoon. The announcement has prompted fears of a new wave of violence following the bloodbath that consumed parts of the Egyptian capital on Wednesday, when security forces resorted to violence to clear two sit-in protest camps.

Officials in Egypt are saying that around 300 people were killed in the melee, but the Islamist Muslim Brotherhood is stating a far higher figure of 2,000 dead. Members of the Muslim Brotherhood and supporters of deposed president Mohammed Morsi have been protesting in Egypt for weeks now after the military takeover at the beginning of July that removed the country's first democratically elected leader following mass public demonstrations.

On Thursday, members of international community intensified diplomatic efforts to resolve the crisis. In Germany, Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle summoned the Egyptian ambassador to the Foreign Ministry in Berlin. Westerwelle said he wanted to send a strong message to the Egyptian government that the bloodbath must be stopped. Speaking during a visit to Tunisia, Westerwelle said, "We cannot allow a vicious cycle of violence to begin now."

Photo Gallery

27  Photos
Photo Gallery: Bloodbath on the Streets of Cairo
French President François Hollande also ordered in the Egyptian ambassador to France for a meeting. Hinting at the seriousness of the meeting, it is usually the foreign minister and not the French president who orders such talks. Hollande's office said the scope of bloodshed made the meeting necessary.

In Germany, the deadly actions by Egyptian security forces lead the front pages of daily papers and the editorial pages. Most argue that both sides -- the Muslim Brotherhood and the interim government -- need to come to the negotiating table in order to prevent the bloodshed from developing into a full-fledged civil war.

The leftist Die Tageszeitung writes:

"The Muslim Brotherhood described the eviction of pro-Morsi supporters from protest camps as a 'massacre.' This appears to be a fair assessment of what has happened. What else is it when peaceful demonstrators are attacked and shot at by armed tanks, and many are left dead or injured? It's not only people who have died in Cairo. So too have hopes that security forces will be willing to return Egypt to democracy. If they crack down with such brutality on the opposition, they will at best tolerate a puppet government, but not an independent one."

"The Egyptian armed forces have been pulling the strings of civilian politicians for decades. It intially looked as though the Arab Spring had put an end to that. But a return to old structures appears to be underway. It seems fair to say that what is currently happening in Egypt amounts to a counter-revolution."

The conservative Die Welt writes:

"When it comes to stating the number of victims, the Muslim Brotherhood has a tendency to exaggerate. In fact, this kind of exaggeration is typical of protest movements around the world. But Egypt has its own peculiarities. Right up to today, the Muslim Brotherhood has been driven by the myth of martyrdom, that they are fighting on earth for just things and that they will be rewarded with paradise if they die for the cause. In other words, the current Muslim Brotherhood leadership has little regard for talks and peaceful protests. Instead they focus on battle and provocation that can easily turn to violence."

"But you can't blame them. The Islamists see no basis for negotiations after the toppling of Mohammed Morsi, the president of their choosing who was freely elected. In addition, it's none other than the language of the underground that drives these old fighters. They were the victims of constant persecution under one Egyptian leader after the other -- from Mubarak and Sadat to Nasser."

"That doesn't mean that this tendency is smart. Under the rule of the military, the fight against current conditions can only end in defeat. It would be wiser for the Muslim Brotherhood to seek a dialogue. Both the military and the interim government are prepared to engage in such talks. By participating in a 'national dialogue,' the Islamists could prevent a civil war and also push through some of their interests."

The left-leaning Berliner Zeitung newspaper writes:

"The brute force employed by the Egyptian police and supported by the military in their attempts to quash protests by supporters of ousted President Morsi seems to be a confirmation of peoples' worst fears: Morsi's removal from office by the country's military leadership under General Abdel Fattah al-Sisis is not an attempt to encourage a new democratic beginning for Egypt. For Al-Sisi, it is about helping the authoritarian forces of the old regime back into power. Not only the violent clearance of protest camps and the arbitrary pursuit of Muslim Brothers, but also the rising number of attacks on churches and police stations are an indication of this."

The conservative Frankfurter Allegemeine Zeitung writes:

"The supporters of the Muslim Brotherhood know only too well that they won't play a political role for quite some time if the order created by the July 3 coup is sustained. Accordingly, many are willing to die as martyrs. With each victim, they will feel even more righteous. The military solution is bloody, but a political solution is still distant. The situation is beyond the scope of international mediators -- they all departed empty-handed. Without movement between the two irreconcilably opposed camps, Egypt will be threatened with persistent instability and a long period of uncertainty. But stability is a prerequisite for economic development."

"At stake here, above all, is the cohesion of Egyptian society. Despite all idealogical disagreements, Egyptians were always proud to belong to the same people. But the tensions of the recent past have driven a wedge into this society. The three most important institutions that ensured the country's cohesion and stayed out of politics -- the military, the Islamic Al Azhar University and the Coptic Church -- were parties in the putsch this time. Morsi's supporters are now disputing their integrity and view these institutions as political enemies. The basis for possible consensus in Egypt has collapsed."

The business daily Handelsblatt writes:

"The bloodbath on the Nile … is a scandal. A scandal for the country, but also a scandal for international diplomacy. Neither US diplomats nor German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle, who last week rushed to Egypt, have been able to help negotiate a peaceful solution."

"It appears the Egyptian military won't listen, either. At the same time, not a single leading Western diplomat has been in Cairo during the last few days. Aside from Westerwelle, they were last seen a few weeks back for an opportune photo op. That's not what sincere efforts look like. As the European Union's top diplomat and the sole person who has access to all sides, Catherine Ashton should have made yet another effort to try everything she could, flanked, of course by the other EU foreign ministers. Unfortunately, like Westerwelle, they are all too often only willing to practice fair-weather diplomacy. But warnings or expressions of concern are insufficient because what is beginning in Egypt is a serious drama -- a vicious cycle of lasting violence."



Discuss this issue with other readers!
8 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
peskyvera 08/15/2013
1. optional
The West's hypocrisy knows no bounds. Always preaching democracy and democratic elections. Well, Egyptians elected Morsi but Morsi is not what the West wanted. Same happened in Gaza: Hamas won, but Hamas is not what the West wanted. When, oh when, is the West going to stop meddling in other nations' business? The world would be so much more peaceful.
danm 08/15/2013
2. No side is blameless
Morsi was setting up a government that would be preferential to his camp and nonresponsive to the wishes of a large segment of the population. Currently there are AP stories running about Pro Morsi forces burning Coptic Churches and attacking government buildings in Giza. While I do not sanction violence and I personally condemn any taking of life, lets also keep some perspective here. Neither of these sides is a defenseless lamb. The Morsi followers tried to grab power too soon before they had consolidated their position and now they are over matched in the power struggle with the army. Effectively they have brought a knife to a gunfight.
spon-facebook-10000234202 08/16/2013
3. The truth will prevail
This is not a peacefull protest and not a massacre . If Egypt military has planned to massacre the protesters.How come there are also too many policemen killed in the event ? Look back the Tianman Square event in China ! That's a massacre. If Morsi claims he is mandated.Why he did refuse to negotiate or to call a election as anti-Morsi protesters requested at the beginning ? It's because he knew for sure that if he calls an election he should fail to be relected. The Muslim Brotherhood , also Morsi camp insistently demand Morsi be reinstated without negotiation proved that they are Extremists party but not Democracy one. 08/16/2013
4. Wait a minute, guys!
Peskyvera is spot-on about Western hypocrisy. But she misses one point: that Morsi is not what most Egyptians wanted either. They are fed-up with authoritarian dictators and have given Morsi the ole heave-ho. After thirty years of Mubarak, they are in no mood for another round of this crap, and frankly, I don't blame them. While I disagree with the Muslim Brotherhood's support of Morsi, I still believe they had a right to peacefully protest in the streets. The military's massacre of those protesters was uncalled for and completely unjustified. It's their country too, and whether you or I agree with them or not, they had a right to express their opinions in the light of day without getting butchered. Soon as those military hacks took over, I saw nothing but trouble, and here's the proof: six hundred corpses! Disgusting. When the military is in control, that's what you get. When-oh-when will we ever learn?
seifube 08/16/2013
5. principle?
America must condemn and slam a sanction on the military.In Africa and The Arab world an institution to which rifle and money entrusted is likely to play a power game like Egypt's military.It is the same everywhere in Africa,the middle east and Asia.If America is an ally of Egyptian people it must withhold the money it gives to Egyptian military annually.Why military coup often symbolize Africa? Because the military has gun and money at hand.why should the generals bother to obey the civilian government instead they give it?
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.