Germany Inc. in Tehran Berlin Faces Hurdles in Push to Get Business Out of Iran
In an effort to forestall an American military strike against Iran, German Chancellor Angela Merkel is pushing for tougher economic sanctions against the mullah-controlled regime in Tehran. But critics say Merkel's plans are sketchy and difficult to implement, while experts disagree over their effectiveness.
Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad at a trade fair in Tehran in 2006. Germany is taking another look at its economic ties to Iran.
The Iranian government bankers enjoyed the spectacular view from the bank's penthouse-level conference room as much as they did hearing its latest quarterly results. Indeed, before adjourning to the adjacent room for Persian delicacies, management reported the best results in the bank's history.
Even the representative from the German Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) seemed impressed. Now that all major German banks have given in to pressure from the United States government and stopped doing business in Iran, business is booming for the Hamburg-based Iranian bank. Its commercial loan portfolio, worth about 3 billion ($4.4 billion), is twice as large as it was last year.
Machinery exporters and trading companies have practically been lining up to move their business from their traditional German banks to the Iranian bank, despite the fact that the US Treasury Department has blacklisted Iran-Europe Commercial Bank, together with two other major Iranian banks, Bank Melli and Bank Saderat. Ironically, Iran's state-owned banks are among the few businesses that have actually benefited and managed to turn a profit from tighter international sanctions against Tehran.
The German government, Merkel announced, would "take another look at German companies' economic ties to Iran." She added that she plans to maintain an ongoing dialogue with German industry on the matter "as we are already beginning to do today."
Merkel's statements were everything but clear, and yet Bush seemed eminently pleased with the chancellor's convoluted language.
The US president was "overjoyed" by Merkel's words, his office later announced, adding that the White House welcomed her newly toughened approach. Bush was pleased that Merkel, instead of focusing on the interests of German industry and her Finance Ministry, wants to see tighter sanctions imposed on Iran.
According to the White House, Merkel also promised Bush that her administration would take a closer look at German companies supplying Tehran with the kind of sophisticated machinery the Iranians are eager to acquire -- an issue that is especially important to the Americans.
The Chancellery also chalked up Merkel's trip to Texas as a great success. The US president, officials in Berlin insisted, had assured Merkel that he is now committed to pushing for a diplomatic solution to the Iranian problem. The military option remains on the table, but only as a deterrent.
Only a few days later, during a routine consultation between senior officials in the German and French governments, Merkel and French President Nicolas Sarkozy explored ways to put together a European alliance of countries willing to participate in the boycott. The Europeans' main goal is to prevent a US military strike, which they believe could have more catastrophic consequences than an Iranian nuclear program.
Western intelligence agencies like Germany's foreign intelligence service, the Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), are convinced that economic reasons alone are enough to rule out an attack. The price of oil would explode, providing Tehran with the cash it would need to repair any damage inflicted in an attack.
However, many in Berlin doubt tougher sanctions would be enough to force Tehran to come around on the nuclear issue. They are merely the price of keeping the Americans peaceful.
The catch-22 in Merkel's pledge is that the plans she proposes are difficult to implement, and the German government has little latitude. Government experts warn against further reducing or even eliminating so-called "Hermes covers" -- export credit guarantees that protect German companies from non-payment by foreign debtors -- for business transactions with Iran, as the Americans are demanding. Although Berlin reduced the government export credit guarantees from 900 million last year to the current level of 500 million, canceling the Hermes guarantees altogether would be risky.
In Berlin, senior government officials fear that, if the guarantees were eliminated, Tehran would no longer have any reason to repay what it already owes. At issue are receivables totaling roughly 5.5 billion, and not collecting on these debts would drive many German companies into bankruptcy. The government would have to jump in to prevent this from happening, which would impose an unacceptable burden on its budget.
Closing the Iranian banks' German offices isn't as easy as the Americans imagine, either. Before this could happen, the European Union would require a United Nations resolution stating that the banks are funding the nuclear weapons program Iran is believed to be developing.
EU member states would only be permitted to take action against the relevant Iranian companies if the UN adopts the necessary resolution. Although the resolution is pending before the UN Security Council, it hasn't been adopted yet. Bank Melli, which maintains an office in Hamburg, already appears on a list of companies to be slapped with additional government sanctions prepared by the political directors of the British, French and German foreign ministries.
Graphic: Exports to Iran
The Merkel administration's approach is controversial in German industrial circles. "We can't limit our business simply because a politician happens to have made a promise to someone," says a senior executive at a pharmaceutical company. "On what legal grounds?"
US government pressure on German corporations and banks is also causing legal problems for the companies in question. By agreeing to participate in a boycott against a foreign country, German businesses would be in violation of foreign trade legislation enacted in 1993. The new laws were introduced because a number of Arab nations had demanded that their trading partners refrain from doing business with Israel. Many companies, fearful of losing their Arab business, caved in and signed the statements their Arab trading partners were demanding. To prevent this from happening in the future, German lawmakers enacted the 1993 legislation, which imposes fines of up to 500,000 on offenders.
By giving in to American pressure, German companies would find themselves in a legal gray area. "It isn't exactly that they're making overt threats," says one German banker, "but they have certainly expressed their wishes and made subtle suggestions. Every banker knows that his bank would run into a lot of problems in the United States if he ignored these wishes."
- Part 1: Berlin Faces Hurdles in Push to Get Business Out of Iran
- Part 2: Many German Companies Are Playing it Safe