Russia Today's Editor-In-Chief 'The West Never Got Over the Cold War Stereotype'

Margarita Simonyan, 33, is the editor-in-chief of the state-funded satellite news network Russia Today. In a SPIEGEL interview, she contends that Western journalists prefer to paint Russia as an evil aggressor and that her station is not an outlet for government propaganda.

Russia Today's editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan: "We are a different country today, one with a different mentality."

Russia Today's editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan: "We are a different country today, one with a different mentality."

Russian President Vladimir Putin has created an anti-CNN for Western audiences with the international satellite news network Russia Today. He commissioned the network in order to "break the monopoly of the Anglo-Saxon mass media." The government seems to be succeeding in its task, with the network gaining more viewers in major cities in the United States that any other foreign broadcaster.

In Washington, 13 times as many viewers tune in to Russia Today than they do its German equivalent Deutsche Welle. A total of 2 million Brits watch the program. On Youtube, the Moscow-based broadcaster recently broke the one-billion-hit barrier, becoming the first broadcaster in the world to do so. Editor-in-chief Margarita Simonyan, 33, views the broadcaster as a sort of ministry of media defense for Russia.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Your network sees itself as a counterweight to the major US broadcasters. How did you manage to poach CNN legend Larry King, 79, of all people?

Simonyan: You'd have to ask him that question, but I do know that he is happy to get back into the game.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: What can Russia Today offer King that others can't?

Simonyan: I can quote him from an interview he gave recently: "I thought I could retire, but I love my job. I thought I wouldn't miss it, but I do."

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Your network is funded by the Russian government. What is its mission statement?

Simonyan: If you tune in to CNN or the BBC on a regular day, 80 or 90 percent of the stories are identical. We want to show that there are more stories out there than the 10-a-day that you usually encouter. I'm not saying that you should watch only our program; I'm saying that you should also watch it.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: The Russian media have a slightly more dramatic take on your objectives. Many are comparing the network to the Ministry of Defense. You said it yourself, when Russia goes to war …

Simonyan: … then we will join them in battle, yes. That goes for the country's real, armed conflicts. Do you remember the August war of 2008? Back then, most Western media outlets acted as if they were Georgia's ministry of defense.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: In 2008, Russian troops invaded Georgian territory after President Mikheil Saakashvili gave the order to attack South Ossetia, a separatist republic with close ties to Russia.

Simonyan: All of the Western broadcasters gave only the Georgian side of the story. Saakashvili was featured on all the networks; his statements were broadcast on all the programs. It was said that Russia started the war.* It was said the country's troops bombed a busy market in the provincial town of Gori. We immediately sent our correspondents out there, who found no trace of either shootings or bombings. Western broadcasters focused their entire coverage on the suffering of Georgian civilians. There was no mention of South Ossetians, meanwhile, who were suffering nightly artillery attacks at the hands of Saakashvili. It was pro-Georgian propaganda, pure and simple.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: It wasn't that one-sided. SPIEGEL, for one, reported at an early stage that it was Saakashvili who had fired the first shot. A European Union committee came to the same conclusion.

Simonyan: Sure, afterwards! But how many people actually ended up reading the EU report? The majority of people to this day believe that Russia started the war totally unprovoked. The evil Russia pounces on poor little Georgia.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: It is not uncommon to see Russia in the role of the aggressor.

Simonyan: Objection! Russia hadn't started a war with another country in 20 years. How many armed conflicts has America engaged in in the same period of time? How many wars has Europe taken part in?

SPIEGEL ONLINE: How do you explain Russia's negative image?

Simonyan: The West never got over the Cold War stereotype. One thing that only few journalists understand is that Russia started dissolving the Soviet Union of its own accord. We were the ones to realize that Communism was a failure. We understood that it was wrong to impose our will on other nations. We released the Eastern bloc into freedom. We are a different country today, one with a different mentality -- which is something that Western journalists sometimes find difficult to comprehend. You, for example, stated earlier that Russia was acting aggressively without backing it up with facts.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Is Russia Today's goal to provide objective reporting? Or is it first and foremost just about offering a perspective different from that of Western media?

Simonyan: Have you already seen many examples of objective reporting in general?

SPIEGEL ONLINE: Efforts are made to be objective. But your network only covers one side, offering Syrian dictator Bashar Assad a platform for his political message.

Simonyan: There are people who refer to Assad's political opponents as the "democratic opposition." Even the rebels, however, have raped women and murdered children. Take Saakashvili, for example. He is held up as a hero by the BBC. For others, he represents an oppressor of freedom. There is no objectivity -- only approximations of the truth by as many different voices as possible.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: The Russian opposition is rarely featured on your network, except as a target of smear campaigns. You even accused Russian blogger and dissident Rustem Adagamov of pedophilia without so much as a scrap of evidence.

Simonyan: Why did we report about Adagamov? Because he was publicly positioning himself as a campaigner for justice.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: The accusations leveled against him are based solely on statements coming from his ex-wife, who says that he sexually abused an underage girl in Norway many years ago. The authorities declined to bring charges against him due to a lack of evidence.

Simonyan: We didn't prosecute him; we merely broadcast a report. We also tried to get a statement from the wife and from Adagamov, too. Would the German media refrain from giving coverage to a political activist accused of sexually abusing a 12-year-old girl? I spoke to the wife myself, and I certainly didn't get the impression that she was crazy.

SPIEGEL ONLINE: How did it come about that your network was the first to broadcast images of the arrest of a CIA spy in Moscow in May? How closely do you work with the authorities?

Simonyan: We received those images from an agency in the same way that every other Russian television network does. It wasn't exclusive material. We were simpler quicker to publish it than others.

*Due to a translation error, an earlier version of this interview suggested that Simonyan said that Russia started the war with Georgia. In actuality, she said that Western media blamed Russia for starting the war. We apologize for the error.

Interview conducted by Benjamin Bidder in Moscow


Discuss this issue with other readers!
22 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1 08/13/2013
1. optional
How interesting to get a different perspective about Russia and the break-up of the Soviet Union! As an American, I am fed-up with the corporate noise machine disguised as "media". I never watch CNN, NBC or other mainstream outlets anymore because they are a complete waste of time.
tomek.e.jankowski 08/13/2013
2. Russia and Western Journalists
I don't think her main argument holds up. During the Cold War, Western journalists generally painted a picture of the Soviet Union a something to be feared, as a threat. The gist of modern Western journalism however is often critical of Putin's Russia, but does not view it as a threat to the West or as something to be feared. Today's Western media largely views Russia through the lens of a country with a deteriorating democratic record, as one with still significant human rights issues, and widespread corruption on a scale almost unprecedented in Europe, but no one's talking about a potential Russian invasion of Central Europe. Ms. Simonyan may not like the picture the Western media paints of Russia, but I think it is nonetheless a very modern portrait, and not a relic of the Cold War. If anything, I think the West has moved on in how it sees Russia, and that Putin has Cold War hang-ups.
filterndecode 08/13/2013
3. What one has to remember...
Yes, RT is mostly a biased propaganda machine devoid of any critical stance vis-à-vis its backer's homeland. It may very well have been born out of the need to counter American propaganda, a rather subdued and polished form one has to concede, but real nonetheless. However, from what I can tell, the success of its ascent was made possible by the viewership gains of 2-3 shows that focused on finance and economics. Remember the 2008 financial crisis ! Of course you do, because it's still there ! It never ended ! This handful of shows at least had the merit of giving voice to what is [conspicuously] never properly discussed on America's mainstream media; that is capitalism's naked truth, and the consequential "Too big to fail" being a feature of it, not a bug, something that could never be uttered in a "serious" newsroom. For all its flaws, this is the one thing RT can be commended for. In 2006, when I first got high speed internet, I barely watched TV anymore, only a few economics&politics shows and a documentary once in while. As the crisis hit full on in 2008-09, I had already completely quit watching it. Then, one day, as I was visiting my parents, and the TV was on... I became so keenly aware of the *inconceivable* mediocrity of not just CNN, but the whole North-American media in general. It is really surreal how horrifically mediocre the news media is in the U.S. So ultimately, that's what we're left with: Mediocrity "combating" Mediocrity. Both camp pretending to an innocence they should not pretend to...
lol1232 08/14/2013
4. news monopoly
I'm not a supporter of socialism but what is said about the news outlets is 100% true..." 80 or 90 percent of the stories are identical. " These outlets have the same news because "These are the 6 media companies that exist today. There used to be 88. These 6 all get their news from Reuters and the Associated Press. Reuters owns the AP and Rothschilds own Reuters." The Rothschilds have been building it's private empire since the Bolsheviks and supported them so when Russia was cut off it also cut out the propaganda except in the black market which thrives because of human greed. When western news infiltrates the Russian media it too will be saturated with spoon fed material that is sent out through the news feeds which ANYONE some don't even have to present sources just "a source which doesn't wish to be identified said"...this is not news it's propaganda which results in social change and herding of the masses. Russia is a capitalist economy (trying to be) and a communist mentality of collectivism to control the masses. Schizchophrenia just like the European and the same because the "bankers" ie. Rothshcilds control the money. Don't believe me ...Russia is a part of the United Nations isn't it??? A part of the Whole....don't ever think your country is special or unique...
spon-facebook-10000234202 08/14/2013
5. Hongkong University has created new terminology
HONGKONG University has created a very new terminology to name the correspondents who work for Government Newspapers,TV and Radio in China,Russia,VietNam ,Cuba and North Korea ,that's WHORESPONDENT. Therefore, they have to act as their masters' MOUTHPIECES to report what their masters want to but not what the truth and fact tell. Putin now has been trying to revive the glory days of Soviet Union empire. Russia has not waged any war in the last 20 years because it is not financially able to do so,but not because it did not want to. Let review Putin and Medvedev statements about the US and the West.You must see their hatred in their languages.What do you think when Medvedev called the West "the cow' in his recent comment regarding Syria conflict and what Putin and Medvedev's statements in Cyprus banking crisis ?
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.