Merkel's Phone Spying Suspicions Put Obama in a Tight Spot

Berlin has reacted strongly to suspicions that US intelligence spied on Chancellor Merkel's mobile phone. If the accusations turn out to be true, it will put President Obama in a rather awkward position.


By in Washington

Jay Carney is used to dicey situations. By now, it has become routine for US President Barack Obama's press secretary to somehow put a positive spin on bad news. But, on Wednesday, Carney found himself in particularly treacherous territory when he was asked during a press briefing whether US intelligence services had monitored the mobile phone of German Chancellor Angela Merkel, the leader of one of America's staunchest allies.

To be on the safe side, Carney read from a prepared statement. He said that Obama had spoken on the telephone with Merkel to discuss the accusations, and that the president has assured the chancellor that the United States "is not monitoring and will not monitor" her communications. "The United States greatly values our close cooperation with Germany on a broad range of shared security challenges," he added.

The reaction was a defensive one, and Carney had to carefully choose each word. Indeed, many suspect that the scandal could strain not only official, bilateral relations between the countries, but also personal ties between Merkel and Obama. Carney's comments came after SPIEGEL reported that American intelligence may have been monitoring the chancellor's mobile phone communications for several years. Berlin's suspicions were strong enough to prompt Merkel to telephone Obama and air her complaints directly to him -- a strong signal of the usually cool-headed chancellor's anger over the scandal.

'A Grave Breach of Trust'

Unlike Carney's explanation, the one offered by Merkel's spokesman Steffen Seibert sounded much less restrained. What's more, these are the toughest statements heard yet from Merkel on the issue of US spying.

Seibert said: "The federal chancellor spoke with President Obama today by telephone. She made it clear that, if the indications prove to be correct, she unequivocally disapproves of such practices, and considers them totally unacceptable. Among friends and partners, like the Federal Republic of Germany and the US have been for decades, such surveillance of communication of heads of government should not take place. This would be a grave breach of trust. Such practices must immediately be put to a stop."

Merkel has clearly gone to the limits of what can be called diplomatic between friends with phrases such as "unequivocally disapprove," "totally unacceptable," and a "grave breach of trust." Naturally, everything preceded by the word "if." All in all, it doesn't really sound like Merkel was reassured by her conversation with Obama. According to the British Daily Telegraph, Merkel's reaction is "the most direct confrontation with a world leader since Edward Snowden began leaking details of the US's global surveillance network."

There is really no reason for reassurance if one listens closely to what Obama's spokesman Carney said. Again: "The President assured the Chancellor that the United States is not monitoring and will not monitor the communications of Chancellor Merkel." That statement is made in the present and future tenses. But what about the past? Has Merkel's phone been under surveillance in the past, or not? When asked by SPIEGEL, a spokeswoman of the US National Security Council would not say if Obama's assurance that the chancellor is not being monitored also applied to the past. This point also was being emphasized in political circles in Berlin Wednesday night.

The unusually strong reaction from the Chancellery was prompted by SPIEGEL research. After the information was examined by the country's foreign intelligence agency, the Federal Intelligence Service (BND), and the Federal Office for Information Security, Berlin seems to have found their suspicions plausible enough to confront the US government.

And, from what one can gather from US media commentary on the scandal, Germany's anger has been unambiguously communicated. The phone conversation "must have been just horrendously uncomfortable," wrote Max Fisher, the foreign affairs blogger for the Washington Post. "If indeed American intelligence was listening to Ms. Merkel's phone, or registering calls made and received," the New York Times wrote, "the trust between Berlin and Washington could be severely damaged." The major TV news outlets are also covering the developing scandal in detail -- and repeatedly noting how Germans are particularly sensitive about privacy issues given the two dictatorships they lived through in the recent past.

Merkel Government Downplayed NSA Spying

If the accusations are substantiated, Obama will be in an extremely tight spot. On Monday, the US president spoke on the phone with his French counterpart François Hollande, who also expressed "deep disapproval" after French daily Le Monde reported that the NSA had eavesdropped on more than 70 million private phone calls of people in France. Washington rejected the report as flawed. Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff and the Mexican government also protested alleged eavesdropping on their private communications.

Obama is increasingly putting the credibility of the US on the line, even with the country's allies -- all the while calling for America to go back to using its "soft power." The repeated line from the US government that all intelligence services employ similar methods is hardly believable any longer. One thing has become clear: Not all intelligence services have the same capabilities as those of the United States.

Merkel, for her part, has an entirely different problem. She would like to appear as the victim here, but her government this summer talked down reports stemming from the Snowden leaks, in some cases flatly denying them. Those statements now sound absurd. In an interview with German public broadcaster ARD in July, Merkel reacted with surprise to the question of whether she had personally been eavesdropped on. "I'm not aware of anything, otherwise I would have reported it to the parliamentary control committee," she said. On another occasion, she assured the public that she had no reason "to doubt the United States' compliance with German law."

Merkel's comments were surpassed by her Interior Minister Hans-Peter Friedrich and Chief of Staff Ronald Pofalla. Friedrich said in August that the "suspicions" had "dissolved into air" and that there were no indications that German government agencies had been spied on. Pofalla similarly declared the spying affair completely over, saying, "The accusations are off the table."

President Obama's reassurances fron early July, when the spying revelations began to develop, now sound stale. If he wanted to know what Chancellor Merkel thinks, he said, he would simply call her.

Discuss this issue with other readers!
5 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
spon-facebook-1177509498 10/24/2013
1. Obama Spying on Merkel
Americans realize that Chancellor Merkel is more intelligent and honest than President Obama. If Merkel wondered if Obama was lying to her, she should have checked to see if his lips were moving. Americans know Obama is a dangerous man who relies on lies, and a compliant media to get his way.
High Hat 10/24/2013
It seems like our American intelligence agencies are running amock under the Obama administration. If we can't recognize our friends we'll never recognize our enemies. Jay Carney's half ass response to this situation doesn't help the situation at all. Obama's lack of any management experience is clear at this point.
ilsehoyle 10/24/2013
3. Obama said that
"If he wanted to know what Chancellor Merkel thinks, he said, he would simply call her." I think those days are over. She may not answer her phone any longer when he calls.
wernercomplex 10/24/2013
4. Deny,Deny, Deny to Lie, Lie, Lie
It should be apparent to everyone except the most radical government Sycophants that spying has been going on between countries forever. Frankly, I don't see how a country or even a corporation can survive in these times without a good spy network. These feigned outrages by heads of state, are but a theatre of the absurd for the benefit of the uneducated voter. Were it not for Mr. Snowden, they would still be blissfully ignorant.
Flippity Gibbit 10/27/2013
5. Snooping on Frau Merckel
As a British Subject I'm concerned about the British Government helping the NSA to spy on fellow EU Members and trusted NATO allies. Surely if the UK is truly committed to the EU then their allegiance should be firstly to the EU NOT the USA? The EU really needs to take Dodgy Dave Cameron to task about this as he is as equally involved as Obama is.
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.