The Syrian Mire Middle East Divisions Deepen amid Civil War

The civil war in Syria is increasingly dividing the Arab world along sectarian lines. The Lebanese militant group Hezbollah has now charged into the fray, joining predominantly Shiite government forces in an effort to dislodge Sunni rebels from the key city of Qusair.


By and

There was an absurd moment in the battle for the small city of Qusair when, last Monday, an old Israeli military jeep was paraded before Syrian state television cameras. According to the state news agency SANA, the jeep, which the army had supposedly captured in Qusair, was clear proof of Israeli involvement in the Syrian civil war. In fact, it added: "This confirms that Israel, Turkey and Qatar are leading the aggression against Syria with a joint operations center."

The SANA report did not explain why they would do so with a vehicle model that was taken out of service 10 years ago. As it turned out, the jeep was from a museum's inventory. Before that, it had been used in the Khima military prison, in southern Lebanon, to transport prisoners until the Israeli army withdrew from the area in May 2000. After that, the Lebanese militant group Hezbollah set up a memorial at the prison, and now it had apparently brought the vehicle to Qusair. This would explain why a tractor could be seen in front of the jeep in the photos.

But despite the propaganda, the bitter battle for Qusair could become a turning point in the Syrian civil war. For the first time, Hezbollah fighters are openly leading the ground war against the insurgents, while the Syrian army provides backup with tanks and, most of all, airstrikes.

Iran, an ally of the Syrian regime, has also sent troops to fight for President Bashar Assad. The rebellion threatens to expand into a sectarian conflict beyond the country's borders along the Middle East's most tension-filled divide: the one running between Sunnis and Shiites. The centers of conflict between the two major denominations of Islam, isolated until now in Lebanon, Iraq and Saudi Arabia, could be drawn into a wider conflict that would quickly engulf the entire region.

On April 30, Hezbollah chief Hassan Nasrallah dramatically announced a policy that would lead to the conflict now being waged in Qusair. After a visit to Tehran, he declared nothing less than a holy war, referring to the rebels in Syria as "Takfiris," or Sunni fanatics who view Shiites as heretics and aim to fight them and desecrate their shrines. For this reason, Nasrallah said, they must act preemptively and do everything in their power to support their fellow Shiites fighting for Assad.

After Nasrallah's speech, Hezbollah units streamed across the border for weeks, closing the ring of siege around Qusair. On Sunday, May 19, they launched an assault on the city, which has long since been bombed to bits. Last Monday, Syrian state media reported that government troops were on the verge of victory, even though rebels were still fighting in the ruins last Friday. In addition, more rebel units are on their way from Aleppo to Qusair, while more Hezbollah fighters continue to arrive from Lebanon.

About 100 rebels and 40 elite Hezbollah fighters were killed on the first two days of the battle alone. For Hezbollah, it was the largest casualty figure since the 2006 war with Israel.

Mounting Antagonism Between Sunnis and Shiites

In the past, Hezbollah buried its fighters killed in Syria discreetly, but now they are carried to their graves in ostentatious processions. The message seems to be that each dead fighter represents an obligation to continue fighting.

But the propagandistic act of desperation with the museum jeep also shows how uncomfortable it makes the "Party of God" to jeopardize its image, developed over the course of three decades, as Lebanon's defender against Israel. Hezbollah, which portrays itself as the Arab "David," repeatedly defying the Israeli "Goliath," has turned into a sectarian army in the fraternal struggle within Islam.

Rather than being a unified state, Lebanon has been held together for years primarily because of a standstill agreement among its religious groupings. But now it is being sucked into the war in neighboring Syria. Last week, the northern Lebanese city of Tripoli saw its worst fighting in years between Sunni radicals and militias made up of Alawites, whose faith is an offshoot of Shiite Islam. Unrest also erupted at a Hezbollah funeral procession in the southern city of Sidon.

The numbers of Sunni jihadists coming to Syria from the entire Arab world is still low. Their old way of defining their enemy was shaped by al-Qaida, which champions the struggle against the West, the Jews and all infidels in general. But this image is changing, and the Sunnis are now opposed to those demonized as the betrayers of true Islam: the Shiites. Indeed, Nasrallah's call for holy war against the Sunnis is being met with a thundering echo.

The Key City of Qusair

Qusair lies about 200 kilometers (125 miles) from the Israeli border. The fact that Hezbollah is now fighting against the very people who sheltered Lebanese citizens fleeing from Israeli bombing in 2006 doesn't make their campaign any more popular in Lebanon. But Qusair is important because one of the routes the rebels use to reach the former industrial city of Homs passes through the town. More important than the city is the nearby highway. If the Syrian regime keeps it open, it can move troops between the territory it holds along the coast and Damascus, and it can move missiles and other military equipment arriving at the port of Tartus to the capital.

In the last two months, Assad's army has established a ring around the Damascus metropolitan area, thereby encircling thousands of rebels in the suburbs. The country could be divided into two parts. Assad's forces have been reduced in size but are still loyal to the president. They are made up of elite units, Alawite militias and Iranian troops and Hezbollah fighters. Together, they hold the western edge of the country, from Damascus to the northern coast, as well as the Druze province of Suwayda in the south and parts of the desert east of Damascus and Homs. Except for a few Syrian army bastions, the rebels hold the rest: Idlib in the north, large parts of Aleppo and the Kurdish regions, Dayr Az Zor in the east, and the southeastern part of the country.

Western news services have reported that the fall of Qusair would cut the rebels off from all weapons supplies. But these claims are incorrect because only one of several smuggling routes passes through Qusair. With the exception of one border crossing, rebels control the entire border with Turkey. A similar situation applies along the border with Jordan and even the border with Iraq, whose government tolerates Assad.

It isn't the transport routes that are blocked. The shipments of ammunition, AK-47s and rocket-propelled grenades, sanctioned by Turkey and Jordan, have been brought to a virtual standstill for weeks. Without American approval, Turkey and the Persian Gulf states are also unable to send weapons to the rebels. But now Washington wants to wait and see what comes of the international peace conference planned for June in Geneva.

Discuss this issue with other readers!
2 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
merlion666 05/29/2013
Zitat von sysopThe civil war in Syria is increasingly dividing the Arab world along sectarian lines. The Lebanese militant group Hezbollah has now charged into the fray, joining predominantly Shiite government forces in an effort to dislodge Sunni rebels from the key city of Qusair.
Would love to see both sides of the story
titus_norberto 05/30/2013
2. Veni vidi vinci, or "veni vidi mentíti direptum et fugerunt"
Counter to Schopenhauer’s recommendation in Parerga und Paralipomena I believe (“…if they are ignorant let them be”…) I will translate from Latin: “I came I saw I conquered” or “I came I saw I lied I looted and escaped”, that is the question. Iraq does not show the signs of a true “mission accomplished” but “mission unfinished” if we compare the times of Saddam Hussein with current (2013) ones in which nearly every week ends-up with about 100 people killed in terrorist attacks. Karzai, in turn, look very similar to General Mubarak appointed by the allies (Israel, USA, UK) who ruled 70 million people plus in Egypt under MARTIAL LAW (including babies women and children) for 30 years without the “free world” saying “mum”… Indeed…, to any inquisitive observer the Middle Eastern kerfuffle is looking as weird and bloody by the minute, and the “stabilizing” forces like USA, EU, UK, NATO (Delian League) seem completely disorientated. I will try to put some intellectual order in this melange. The FIRST mistake someone TRULY desiring to STABILIZE the Middle East (Israel does not, in my view) is to focus on problems in the very order USA’s government addresses them. Let me explain, the Middle East conflict can be seen either as a collection of relatively independent conflicts which can be addressed one by one or as one single and coherent problem. Israel intends to make US believe that it is a collection of problems and using mass media and influence it FRAMES the issues in a particular order. For example, we were made to believe that Saddam Hussein was the most urgent and immediate problem to address after Sep 11. Big lie… Iraq had nothing to do with Sep 11 as we all now know... But a CHANGE of REGIME was effected… Henry Kissinger when asked what was the rationale of attacking Iraq (action he supported) he cynically answered: “Because Afghanistan was not enough”… That tells US ALL. Then the FOCUS was turned against Libya, ANOTHER CHANGE of REGIME was effected, but judging by the US embassy attack, it is not “mission accomplished” YET. Now, the focus is Syria. Syria should be converted in a pliable state as Jordan or Balkanized as Iraq… ANOTHER CHANGE of REGIME is currently intended, not SOLVING the PROBLEM… The truth is that Israel’s AIM is to place weak pliable governments in ALL its neighbors countries WITHOUT RESOLVING the PALESTINE issue. This is the quid of the question, namely he SEQUENCE ! Israel will SABOTAGE ANY STABLE PEACE up until the PALESTINE "problem" can be addressed from a position of OVERWHELMING POWER, therefore, NEVER ! Syria weak or in chaos guarantee the safety of the Golan Heights as a BONUS. Even more, Israel is not afraid at all of Al Qaeda acquiring weapons since Israel, alas, is a police state, Al Qaeda never attacked Israel because it does not have the capability due to the APARTHEID system implemented by Israel. By induction we began to see that solving problems ONE by ONE in the very succession Israel presents them to US according to its needs will NOT solve the FUNDAMENTAL PROBLEM at the HART which it is the unfinished problem of PALESTINE recognized as a FULL FLEDGED state by Israel. With this caveat in mind it is obvious that the most sensible thing to do is to include the Palestine independence issue as part of the “negotiations” between Al Assad government and the rebels and, please forgive the “digression”, not forgetting that the US and UK and the EU (Britain managing the foreign policy) and NATO and Russia and Iran, and the UN, naming just a few INCUMBENTS…, are involved as well… plus Israel’s strategic interests carrying a heavy weight such as sovereignty over the Golan Heights and PALESTINE not FULLY recognized as a free nation as the Marshall islands (contaminated nuclear test site for US nuclear weapons) or Panama (invaded by the US) are... It is very naïve to ignore that Israel has vested interest in keeping these problems UNRESOLVED for as LONG as POSSIBLE. Simple, chaos in the region favor Israel vested interests since the ones responsible to sort them out are not themselves and the battle field is within Israel’s enemies land and population. Therefore, it is clear that while Israel is BENEFITED by the current situation at CERO COST, Israel will continue to destabilizing the region at the expense of the rest of the world. The ones believing that “stop the fighting now !” in Syria is THE “solution”… are far deluded victims of Israel’s manipulation. The TRUE solution is COUNTER INTUITIVE and it is addressing problems LOGICALLY and not CHRONOLOGICALLY, namely FORCING Israel to solve PALESTINE sovereignty and the issue of the CAPITAL in Jerusalem FIRST. Otherwise the problem will continue to be INTRACTABLE and WORSENING. Perhaps the next MOVE will be Egypt or even Iran and, perhaps we will end in WW III which is long overdue if we believe in historical statistics….
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.