Faraway, So Close! Earth-Like Planet Discovered Orbiting Proxima Centauri

European astronomers have discovered an Earth-like planet that is orbiting Proxima Centauri, our nearest fixed star. It's possible it has water -- and, with it, life.

Hubble image of Proxima Centauri
ESA/ Hubble/ NASA

Hubble image of Proxima Centauri

By Olaf Stampf

The faraway world exists in constant twilight. Although its nearby blood-red dwarf star only provides one tiny fraction of our sun's light, its warmth might still be enough to create a life-sustaining climate.

But is there really life on this newly detected planet? Nobody knows -- at least not yet. Only one thing is certain: Because of the darkness, animals and plants would look different from the ones we know from Earth. Trees and shrubs would have pitch-black leaves, as if they'd been burned. The alien flora would need to be darkly colored to use the dim starlight for its photosynthesis.

And what about higher forms of life, like animals or intelligent beings? It's very possible that exotic organisms exist on the planet. Given that it is several million years older than the Earth, it would have had enough time for life to develop.

On the other hand, it would also have to repeatedly withstand hellish conditions. Its sun is a so-called flare star, a cosmic fire-breather that tends to produce apocalyptic eruptions of plasma. All of the planet's oceans, rivers and lakes may well have long since evaporated.

The newly discovered planet doesn't yet have a name, but the red dwarf star around which it circles is famous: Proxima Centauri, our nearest fixed star, only 4.24 lightyears away -- our sun's closest neighbor.

That's what makes this finding so scientifically exciting. At this point, the discovery of planets that are illuminated by distant stars isn't much of a novelty anymore. Over 3,000 "extrasolar planets" have been discovered in the last few years. But most of them are many hundreds of lightyears away, and are nearly impossible to further investigate. Proxima's satellite is different: Never before have planet-hunters come upon another possible Earth that is so nearby, offering researchers the opportunity to actually search for traces of life.

The European Southern Observatory (ESO) plans on making the discovery, which has thus far been kept secret, public by the end of August. "It was hard work finding the tiny celestial body," an astrophysicist who was involved in the search told SPIEGEL. "We were at the limits of what is technologically possible when it comes to measurements."

The successful search project is called "Pale Red Dot." The name is a reference to the legendary "Pale Blue Dot" photo that the Voyager 1 space probe took in 1990 when it was in the process of leaving the solar system forever. Its photo shows the Earth as a tiny blue dot. The researchers wanted to find a corollary red twin Earth -- and they seem to have succeeded.

The Next Step

The search for planets was conducted using a specialized reflector telescope that the Europeans operate on a mountain called la Silla in the Atacama Desert in Chile. At the start of this year, the space researchers began to direct the instrument at Proxima Centauri, which cannot be seen with the naked eye. For months, they repeatedly recorded its dim starlight and the highly sensitive measurement instruments ultimately discovered that the dwarf star lurches suspiciously from side to side.

Graphic: A telltale play of color

Graphic: A telltale play of color

At this point, the data-evaluation process has been completed. For the astrophysicists there is no doubt left: The dance of the dwarf star is caused by an unseen companion tugging at Proxima Centauri. The planet's calculated mass suggests that it is rocky, like the Earth.

Even more exciting: It moves so close to the small red sun that liquid water could exist on its surface, which is thought to be a decisive factor when it comes to the possibility of life.

The researchers' next big goal is logical. They want to determine whether the planet truly is an oasis in space. In order to do that, light from the planet would need to be intercepted and used to determine the chemical composition of its distant atmosphere.

The simultaneous presence of oxygen and methane would be enough to indicate life. Both gases react with one another to create carbon dioxide and water. In a barren atmosphere, oxygen and methane only exist in small amounts. If the levels are high, then organisms like bacteria or algae that produce the two gases must be present -- it would be a kind of chemical fingerprint proving the existence of extraterrestrial life.

This kind of breakthrough discovery would make Proxima Centauri a tempting target for an interstellar research mission. Unfortunately, however, even this closest star is still unreachably distant.

Using today's rockets, the distance between the stars is almost impossible to traverse: A conventional space probe would need about 80,000 years to get there -- about as long as humans have existed on Earth thus far.

Things would go faster with the help of futuristic fusion propulsion, which German-American physicist Friedwardt Winterberg designed as early as the 1970s for the legendary Project Daedalus. His blueprint, which has been further developed since, sounds adventurous: The explosions of tiny hydrogen bombs, that release huge amounts of energy, could accelerate a space ship to over 10 percent of light speed.

But even a flight to the new planet at that rapid speed would take half a century -- for the astronauts who dare to go, it would be a one-way journey.

Related Topics

Discuss this issue with other readers!
8 total posts
Show all comments
Page 1
vas-ygm 08/17/2016
1. New planet in the Proxima Centauri system
Is not Proxima Centauri also called Alpha Centauri? Why is further information about this planet being kept a secret, and the source of the original article is not being confirmed or identified?
macca51 08/18/2016
2. Desperation
Whilst articles like this are interesting they speak more to the increasing desperation of those who want to believe in extra-terrestrial life. Desperation because there is absolutely no hard evidence for life anywhere else but here. As an example SETI, which has now been running for over 50 years has not detected a single verifiable intelligent transmission of any kind. And of the 3000 or so planets discovered how many conform to the pattern of the only solar system we know that supports life? None. Now we have something orbiting a red dwarf which people are beginning to fantasise about. "Black foliage" to photosynthesise the dim light from a red dwarf? Give me a break. We don't even know how life began on this planet and we are talking about unbelievably bizarre forms of life. Of course agencies like NASA and the European Space Agency need to justify their budgets. They learned from the Apollo programme that people lose interest very quickly so they need to keep the public interested with these fantasies to ensure the tax payers dollars keep flowing. How's the search for life on Mars going by the way?
jspencermorris 08/20/2016
@ vas-gym Proxima Centauri is actually a star, and in fact the nearest star to our own. Proxima Centauri is also known as 'Alpha Centauri C' because it belongs to the triple-star system Alpha Centauri (though it is relatively loosely bound to the other stars). Further information isn't being kept 'secret.' Rather, the scientists making the observations are very carefully trying to sort out what 'information' exists at all by re-measureing and re-calculating everything they can think of so as to be absolutely certain that the 'information' they publish is rock-solid (no pun intended) and correct.
kaczma56 08/21/2016
4. Proxima Centuari
Interesting article, but we have to be sensible and practicable. We are technologically very primitive yet and think about the cost of that expedition? Our solar system have enough of resources for us for next "million" years , so why to bother? Regarding extra-terrestrial life , who really cares? Life is very unique , anything is possible.
alan_stone2000 08/21/2016
5. Wild guess as normative
It is 21st century and no longer do we think that planets orbiting stars are surprising or unusual. Is it really necessary to gild the lily and bring in the astronomically minuscule chance that life is on a newly identified planet around yet another star?
Show all comments
Page 1

All Rights Reserved
Reproduction only allowed with permission

Die Homepage wurde aktualisiert. Jetzt aufrufen.
Hinweis nicht mehr anzeigen.